Meta-analysis of glioblastoma multiforme <it>versus </it>anaplastic astrocytoma identifies robust gene markers

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Anaplastic astrocytoma (AA) and its more aggressive counterpart, glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), are the most common intrinsic brain tumors in adults and are almost universally fatal. A deeper understanding of the molecular relationsh...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Park Peter J, Johnson Mark D, Dreyfuss Jonathan M
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2009-09-01
Series:Molecular Cancer
Online Access:http://www.molecular-cancer.com/content/8/1/71
_version_ 1818766446548746240
author Park Peter J
Johnson Mark D
Dreyfuss Jonathan M
author_facet Park Peter J
Johnson Mark D
Dreyfuss Jonathan M
author_sort Park Peter J
collection DOAJ
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Anaplastic astrocytoma (AA) and its more aggressive counterpart, glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), are the most common intrinsic brain tumors in adults and are almost universally fatal. A deeper understanding of the molecular relationship of these tumor types is necessary to derive insights into the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of gliomas. Although genomewide profiling of expression levels with microarrays can be used to identify differentially expressed genes between these tumor types, comparative studies so far have resulted in gene lists that show little overlap.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>To achieve a more accurate and stable list of the differentially expressed genes and pathways between primary GBM and AA, we performed a meta-analysis using publicly available genome-scale mRNA data sets. There were four data sets with sufficiently large sample sizes of both GBMs and AAs, all of which coincidentally used human U133 platforms from Affymetrix, allowing for easier and more precise integration of data. After scoring genes and pathways within each data set, we combined the statistics across studies using the nonparametric rank sum method to identify the features that differentiate GBMs and AAs. We found >900 statistically significant probe sets after correction for multiple testing from the >22,000 tested. We also used the rank sum approach to select >20 significant Biocarta pathways after correction for multiple testing out of >175 pathways examined. The most significant pathway was the hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) pathway. Our analysis suggests that many of the most statistically significant genes work together in a <it>HIF1A</it>/<it>VEGF</it>-regulated network to increase angiogenesis and invasion in GBM when compared to AA.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>We have performed a meta-analysis of genome-scale mRNA expression data for 289 human malignant gliomas and have identified a list of >900 probe sets and >20 pathways that are significantly different between GBM and AA. These feature lists could be utilized to aid in diagnosis, prognosis, and grade reduction of high-grade gliomas and to identify genes that were not previously suspected of playing an important role in glioma biology. More generally, this approach suggests that combined analysis of existing data sets can reveal new insights and that the large amount of publicly available cancer data sets should be further utilized in a similar manner.</p>
first_indexed 2024-12-18T08:34:07Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b188d0f681de44d7bf241c4ac5a91105
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1476-4598
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-18T08:34:07Z
publishDate 2009-09-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Molecular Cancer
spelling doaj.art-b188d0f681de44d7bf241c4ac5a911052022-12-21T21:14:22ZengBMCMolecular Cancer1476-45982009-09-01817110.1186/1476-4598-8-71Meta-analysis of glioblastoma multiforme <it>versus </it>anaplastic astrocytoma identifies robust gene markersPark Peter JJohnson Mark DDreyfuss Jonathan M<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Anaplastic astrocytoma (AA) and its more aggressive counterpart, glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), are the most common intrinsic brain tumors in adults and are almost universally fatal. A deeper understanding of the molecular relationship of these tumor types is necessary to derive insights into the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of gliomas. Although genomewide profiling of expression levels with microarrays can be used to identify differentially expressed genes between these tumor types, comparative studies so far have resulted in gene lists that show little overlap.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>To achieve a more accurate and stable list of the differentially expressed genes and pathways between primary GBM and AA, we performed a meta-analysis using publicly available genome-scale mRNA data sets. There were four data sets with sufficiently large sample sizes of both GBMs and AAs, all of which coincidentally used human U133 platforms from Affymetrix, allowing for easier and more precise integration of data. After scoring genes and pathways within each data set, we combined the statistics across studies using the nonparametric rank sum method to identify the features that differentiate GBMs and AAs. We found >900 statistically significant probe sets after correction for multiple testing from the >22,000 tested. We also used the rank sum approach to select >20 significant Biocarta pathways after correction for multiple testing out of >175 pathways examined. The most significant pathway was the hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) pathway. Our analysis suggests that many of the most statistically significant genes work together in a <it>HIF1A</it>/<it>VEGF</it>-regulated network to increase angiogenesis and invasion in GBM when compared to AA.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>We have performed a meta-analysis of genome-scale mRNA expression data for 289 human malignant gliomas and have identified a list of >900 probe sets and >20 pathways that are significantly different between GBM and AA. These feature lists could be utilized to aid in diagnosis, prognosis, and grade reduction of high-grade gliomas and to identify genes that were not previously suspected of playing an important role in glioma biology. More generally, this approach suggests that combined analysis of existing data sets can reveal new insights and that the large amount of publicly available cancer data sets should be further utilized in a similar manner.</p>http://www.molecular-cancer.com/content/8/1/71
spellingShingle Park Peter J
Johnson Mark D
Dreyfuss Jonathan M
Meta-analysis of glioblastoma multiforme <it>versus </it>anaplastic astrocytoma identifies robust gene markers
Molecular Cancer
title Meta-analysis of glioblastoma multiforme <it>versus </it>anaplastic astrocytoma identifies robust gene markers
title_full Meta-analysis of glioblastoma multiforme <it>versus </it>anaplastic astrocytoma identifies robust gene markers
title_fullStr Meta-analysis of glioblastoma multiforme <it>versus </it>anaplastic astrocytoma identifies robust gene markers
title_full_unstemmed Meta-analysis of glioblastoma multiforme <it>versus </it>anaplastic astrocytoma identifies robust gene markers
title_short Meta-analysis of glioblastoma multiforme <it>versus </it>anaplastic astrocytoma identifies robust gene markers
title_sort meta analysis of glioblastoma multiforme it versus it anaplastic astrocytoma identifies robust gene markers
url http://www.molecular-cancer.com/content/8/1/71
work_keys_str_mv AT parkpeterj metaanalysisofglioblastomamultiformeitversusitanaplasticastrocytomaidentifiesrobustgenemarkers
AT johnsonmarkd metaanalysisofglioblastomamultiformeitversusitanaplasticastrocytomaidentifiesrobustgenemarkers
AT dreyfussjonathanm metaanalysisofglioblastomamultiformeitversusitanaplasticastrocytomaidentifiesrobustgenemarkers