Interventions for hyperhidrosis in secondary care: a systematic review and value-of-information analysis

Background: Hyperhidrosis is uncontrollable excessive sweating that occurs at rest, regardless of temperature. The symptoms of hyperhidrosis can significantly affect quality of life. The management of hyperhidrosis is uncertain and variable. Objective: To establish the expected value of undertaking...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ros Wade, Stephen Rice, Alexis Llewellyn, Eoin Moloney, Julie Jones-Diette, Julija Stoniute, Kath Wright, Alison M Layton, Nick J Levell, Gerard Stansby, Dawn Craig, Nerys Woolacott
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: NIHR Journals Library 2017-12-01
Series:Health Technology Assessment
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3310/hta21800
_version_ 1828496548600741888
author Ros Wade
Stephen Rice
Alexis Llewellyn
Eoin Moloney
Julie Jones-Diette
Julija Stoniute
Kath Wright
Alison M Layton
Nick J Levell
Gerard Stansby
Dawn Craig
Nerys Woolacott
author_facet Ros Wade
Stephen Rice
Alexis Llewellyn
Eoin Moloney
Julie Jones-Diette
Julija Stoniute
Kath Wright
Alison M Layton
Nick J Levell
Gerard Stansby
Dawn Craig
Nerys Woolacott
author_sort Ros Wade
collection DOAJ
description Background: Hyperhidrosis is uncontrollable excessive sweating that occurs at rest, regardless of temperature. The symptoms of hyperhidrosis can significantly affect quality of life. The management of hyperhidrosis is uncertain and variable. Objective: To establish the expected value of undertaking additional research to determine the most effective interventions for the management of refractory primary hyperhidrosis in secondary care. Methods: A systematic review and economic model, including a value-of-information (VOI) analysis. Treatments to be prescribed by dermatologists and minor surgical treatments for hyperhidrosis of the hands, feet and axillae were reviewed; as endoscopic thoracic sympathectomy (ETS) is incontestably an end-of-line treatment, it was not reviewed further. Fifteen databases (e.g. CENTRAL, PubMed and PsycINFO), conference proceedings and trial registers were searched from inception to July 2016. Systematic review methods were followed. Pairwise meta-analyses were conducted for comparisons between botulinum toxin (BTX) injections and placebo for axillary hyperhidrosis, but otherwise, owing to evidence limitations, data were synthesised narratively. A decision-analytic model assessed the cost-effectiveness and VOI of five treatments (iontophoresis, medication, BTX, curettage, ETS) in 64 different sequences for axillary hyperhidrosis only. Results and conclusions: Fifty studies were included in the effectiveness review: 32 randomised controlled trials (RCTs), 17 non-RCTs and one large prospective case series. Most studies were small, rated as having a high risk of bias and poorly reported. The interventions assessed in the review were iontophoresis, BTX, anticholinergic medications, curettage and newer energy-based technologies that damage the sweat gland (e.g. laser, microwave). There is moderate-quality evidence of a large statistically significant effect of BTX on axillary hyperhidrosis symptoms, compared with placebo. There was weak but consistent evidence for iontophoresis for palmar hyperhidrosis. Evidence for other interventions was of low or very low quality. For axillary hyperhidrosis cost-effectiveness results indicated that iontophoresis, BTX, medication, curettage and ETS was the most cost-effective sequence (probability 0.8), with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of £9304 per quality-adjusted life-year. Uncertainty associated with study bias was not reflected in the economic results. Patients and clinicians attending an end-of-project workshop were satisfied with the sequence of treatments for axillary hyperhidrosis identified as being cost-effective. All patient advisors considered that the Hyperhidrosis Quality of Life Index was superior to other tools commonly used in hyperhidrosis research for assessing quality of life. Limitations: The evidence for the clinical effectiveness and safety of second-line treatments for primary hyperhidrosis is limited. This meant that there was insufficient evidence to draw conclusions for most interventions assessed and the cost-effectiveness analysis was restricted to hyperhidrosis of the axilla. Future work: Based on anecdotal evidence and inference from evidence for the axillae, participants agreed that a trial of BTX (with anaesthesia) compared with iontophoresis for palmar hyperhidrosis would be most useful. The VOI analysis indicates that further research into the effectiveness of existing medications might be worthwhile, but it is unclear that such trials are of clinical importance. Research that established a robust estimate of the annual incidence of axillary hyperhidrosis in the UK population would reduce the uncertainty in future VOI analyses. Study registration: This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42015027803. Funding: The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T12:31:43Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b18b7110da9b421bad173a22c366f66c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1366-5278
2046-4924
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T12:31:43Z
publishDate 2017-12-01
publisher NIHR Journals Library
record_format Article
series Health Technology Assessment
spelling doaj.art-b18b7110da9b421bad173a22c366f66c2022-12-22T01:07:13ZengNIHR Journals LibraryHealth Technology Assessment1366-52782046-49242017-12-01218010.3310/hta2180014/211/02Interventions for hyperhidrosis in secondary care: a systematic review and value-of-information analysisRos Wade0Stephen Rice1Alexis Llewellyn2Eoin Moloney3Julie Jones-Diette4Julija Stoniute5Kath Wright6Alison M Layton7Nick J Levell8Gerard Stansby9Dawn Craig10Nerys Woolacott11Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, UKInstitute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UKCentre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, UKInstitute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UKCentre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, UKInstitute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UKCentre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, UKHarrogate and District NHS Foundation Trust, Harrogate, UKNorfolk and Norwich University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Norwich, UKThe Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UKInstitute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UKCentre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, UKBackground: Hyperhidrosis is uncontrollable excessive sweating that occurs at rest, regardless of temperature. The symptoms of hyperhidrosis can significantly affect quality of life. The management of hyperhidrosis is uncertain and variable. Objective: To establish the expected value of undertaking additional research to determine the most effective interventions for the management of refractory primary hyperhidrosis in secondary care. Methods: A systematic review and economic model, including a value-of-information (VOI) analysis. Treatments to be prescribed by dermatologists and minor surgical treatments for hyperhidrosis of the hands, feet and axillae were reviewed; as endoscopic thoracic sympathectomy (ETS) is incontestably an end-of-line treatment, it was not reviewed further. Fifteen databases (e.g. CENTRAL, PubMed and PsycINFO), conference proceedings and trial registers were searched from inception to July 2016. Systematic review methods were followed. Pairwise meta-analyses were conducted for comparisons between botulinum toxin (BTX) injections and placebo for axillary hyperhidrosis, but otherwise, owing to evidence limitations, data were synthesised narratively. A decision-analytic model assessed the cost-effectiveness and VOI of five treatments (iontophoresis, medication, BTX, curettage, ETS) in 64 different sequences for axillary hyperhidrosis only. Results and conclusions: Fifty studies were included in the effectiveness review: 32 randomised controlled trials (RCTs), 17 non-RCTs and one large prospective case series. Most studies were small, rated as having a high risk of bias and poorly reported. The interventions assessed in the review were iontophoresis, BTX, anticholinergic medications, curettage and newer energy-based technologies that damage the sweat gland (e.g. laser, microwave). There is moderate-quality evidence of a large statistically significant effect of BTX on axillary hyperhidrosis symptoms, compared with placebo. There was weak but consistent evidence for iontophoresis for palmar hyperhidrosis. Evidence for other interventions was of low or very low quality. For axillary hyperhidrosis cost-effectiveness results indicated that iontophoresis, BTX, medication, curettage and ETS was the most cost-effective sequence (probability 0.8), with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of £9304 per quality-adjusted life-year. Uncertainty associated with study bias was not reflected in the economic results. Patients and clinicians attending an end-of-project workshop were satisfied with the sequence of treatments for axillary hyperhidrosis identified as being cost-effective. All patient advisors considered that the Hyperhidrosis Quality of Life Index was superior to other tools commonly used in hyperhidrosis research for assessing quality of life. Limitations: The evidence for the clinical effectiveness and safety of second-line treatments for primary hyperhidrosis is limited. This meant that there was insufficient evidence to draw conclusions for most interventions assessed and the cost-effectiveness analysis was restricted to hyperhidrosis of the axilla. Future work: Based on anecdotal evidence and inference from evidence for the axillae, participants agreed that a trial of BTX (with anaesthesia) compared with iontophoresis for palmar hyperhidrosis would be most useful. The VOI analysis indicates that further research into the effectiveness of existing medications might be worthwhile, but it is unclear that such trials are of clinical importance. Research that established a robust estimate of the annual incidence of axillary hyperhidrosis in the UK population would reduce the uncertainty in future VOI analyses. Study registration: This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42015027803. Funding: The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.https://doi.org/10.3310/hta21800hyperhidrosisdermatologytreatmentiontophoresisbotulinum toxinanticholinergiccurettagesympathectomysystematic reviewmeta-analysiscost-effectivenessvalue-of-information analysis
spellingShingle Ros Wade
Stephen Rice
Alexis Llewellyn
Eoin Moloney
Julie Jones-Diette
Julija Stoniute
Kath Wright
Alison M Layton
Nick J Levell
Gerard Stansby
Dawn Craig
Nerys Woolacott
Interventions for hyperhidrosis in secondary care: a systematic review and value-of-information analysis
Health Technology Assessment
hyperhidrosis
dermatology
treatment
iontophoresis
botulinum toxin
anticholinergic
curettage
sympathectomy
systematic review
meta-analysis
cost-effectiveness
value-of-information analysis
title Interventions for hyperhidrosis in secondary care: a systematic review and value-of-information analysis
title_full Interventions for hyperhidrosis in secondary care: a systematic review and value-of-information analysis
title_fullStr Interventions for hyperhidrosis in secondary care: a systematic review and value-of-information analysis
title_full_unstemmed Interventions for hyperhidrosis in secondary care: a systematic review and value-of-information analysis
title_short Interventions for hyperhidrosis in secondary care: a systematic review and value-of-information analysis
title_sort interventions for hyperhidrosis in secondary care a systematic review and value of information analysis
topic hyperhidrosis
dermatology
treatment
iontophoresis
botulinum toxin
anticholinergic
curettage
sympathectomy
systematic review
meta-analysis
cost-effectiveness
value-of-information analysis
url https://doi.org/10.3310/hta21800
work_keys_str_mv AT roswade interventionsforhyperhidrosisinsecondarycareasystematicreviewandvalueofinformationanalysis
AT stephenrice interventionsforhyperhidrosisinsecondarycareasystematicreviewandvalueofinformationanalysis
AT alexisllewellyn interventionsforhyperhidrosisinsecondarycareasystematicreviewandvalueofinformationanalysis
AT eoinmoloney interventionsforhyperhidrosisinsecondarycareasystematicreviewandvalueofinformationanalysis
AT juliejonesdiette interventionsforhyperhidrosisinsecondarycareasystematicreviewandvalueofinformationanalysis
AT julijastoniute interventionsforhyperhidrosisinsecondarycareasystematicreviewandvalueofinformationanalysis
AT kathwright interventionsforhyperhidrosisinsecondarycareasystematicreviewandvalueofinformationanalysis
AT alisonmlayton interventionsforhyperhidrosisinsecondarycareasystematicreviewandvalueofinformationanalysis
AT nickjlevell interventionsforhyperhidrosisinsecondarycareasystematicreviewandvalueofinformationanalysis
AT gerardstansby interventionsforhyperhidrosisinsecondarycareasystematicreviewandvalueofinformationanalysis
AT dawncraig interventionsforhyperhidrosisinsecondarycareasystematicreviewandvalueofinformationanalysis
AT neryswoolacott interventionsforhyperhidrosisinsecondarycareasystematicreviewandvalueofinformationanalysis