Performance of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Guideline‐Recommended Pretest Probability Model for the Diagnosis of Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease

Background Substantial differences exist between different guideline‐recommended pretest probability (PTP) models for the detection of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). This study was performed to study the performance of the 2021 American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology (A...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Simon Winther, Theodore Murphy, Samuel Emil Schmidt, Jeroen J. Bax, William Wijns, Juhani Knuuti, Morten Bøttcher
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2022-12-01
Series:Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.122.027260
_version_ 1811170054410076160
author Simon Winther
Theodore Murphy
Samuel Emil Schmidt
Jeroen J. Bax
William Wijns
Juhani Knuuti
Morten Bøttcher
author_facet Simon Winther
Theodore Murphy
Samuel Emil Schmidt
Jeroen J. Bax
William Wijns
Juhani Knuuti
Morten Bøttcher
author_sort Simon Winther
collection DOAJ
description Background Substantial differences exist between different guideline‐recommended pretest probability (PTP) models for the detection of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). This study was performed to study the performance of the 2021 American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology (AHA/ACC) guideline‐recommended PTP (AHA/ACC‐PTP) model in assessing the likelihood of obstructive CAD compared with previously proposed models. Methods and Results Symptomatic patients (N=50 561) referred for coronary computed tomography angiography were included. The reference standard was invasive coronary angiography with optional fractional flow reserve measurements. The AHA/ACC‐PTP values based on sex and age were calculated and compared with the 2019 European Society of Cardiology guideline PTP values based on sex, age, and symptoms as well as the risk factor–weighted clinical likelihood values based on sex, age, symptoms, and risk factors. The AHA/ACC‐PTP maximum values overestimated by a factor of 2.6 the actual prevalence of CAD. Compared with the AHA/ACC‐PTP model (area under the receiver‐operating curve, 71.5 [95% CI, 70.7–72.2]), inclusion of typicality of symptoms in the European Society of Cardiology guideline PTP improved discrimination of CAD (area under the receiver‐operating curve, 75.5 [95% CI, 74.7–76.3]). Inclusion of both symptoms and risk factors in the risk factor–weighted clinical likelihood model further improved discrimination (area under the receiver‐operating curve, 77.7 [95% CI, 77.0–78.5]). The proportion of patients classified as very low PTP was lower using the AHA/ACC‐PTP (5%) compared with the European Society of Cardiology guideline PTP (19%) and the risk factor–weighted clinical likelihood (49%) models. Conclusions The new AHA/ACC‐PTP model overestimates the prevalence of obstructive CAD substantially if type of symptoms and risk factors are not taken into account. Inclusion of both symptoms and risk factors improves model performance and identifies more patients with very low likelihood of CAD in whom further testing can be deferred.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T16:51:12Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b1cea6c53f5b455bbce65668948a07b7
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2047-9980
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T16:51:12Z
publishDate 2022-12-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
spelling doaj.art-b1cea6c53f5b455bbce65668948a07b72023-02-07T16:03:49ZengWileyJournal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease2047-99802022-12-01112410.1161/JAHA.122.027260Performance of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Guideline‐Recommended Pretest Probability Model for the Diagnosis of Obstructive Coronary Artery DiseaseSimon Winther0Theodore Murphy1Samuel Emil Schmidt2Jeroen J. Bax3William Wijns4Juhani Knuuti5Morten Bøttcher6Department of Cardiology Gødstrup Hospital Herning DenmarkBarts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew’s Hospital, Barts Health National Health Service (NHS) Trust London United KingdomDepartment of Health Science and Technology Aalborg University Aalborg Øst DenmarkHeart Center Turku University Hsopital and University of Turku Turku FinlandThe Lambe Institute for Translational Medicine and Curam National University of Ireland Galway IrelandTurku PET Centre Turku University Hospital and University of Turku Turku FinlandDepartment of Cardiology Gødstrup Hospital Herning DenmarkBackground Substantial differences exist between different guideline‐recommended pretest probability (PTP) models for the detection of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). This study was performed to study the performance of the 2021 American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology (AHA/ACC) guideline‐recommended PTP (AHA/ACC‐PTP) model in assessing the likelihood of obstructive CAD compared with previously proposed models. Methods and Results Symptomatic patients (N=50 561) referred for coronary computed tomography angiography were included. The reference standard was invasive coronary angiography with optional fractional flow reserve measurements. The AHA/ACC‐PTP values based on sex and age were calculated and compared with the 2019 European Society of Cardiology guideline PTP values based on sex, age, and symptoms as well as the risk factor–weighted clinical likelihood values based on sex, age, symptoms, and risk factors. The AHA/ACC‐PTP maximum values overestimated by a factor of 2.6 the actual prevalence of CAD. Compared with the AHA/ACC‐PTP model (area under the receiver‐operating curve, 71.5 [95% CI, 70.7–72.2]), inclusion of typicality of symptoms in the European Society of Cardiology guideline PTP improved discrimination of CAD (area under the receiver‐operating curve, 75.5 [95% CI, 74.7–76.3]). Inclusion of both symptoms and risk factors in the risk factor–weighted clinical likelihood model further improved discrimination (area under the receiver‐operating curve, 77.7 [95% CI, 77.0–78.5]). The proportion of patients classified as very low PTP was lower using the AHA/ACC‐PTP (5%) compared with the European Society of Cardiology guideline PTP (19%) and the risk factor–weighted clinical likelihood (49%) models. Conclusions The new AHA/ACC‐PTP model overestimates the prevalence of obstructive CAD substantially if type of symptoms and risk factors are not taken into account. Inclusion of both symptoms and risk factors improves model performance and identifies more patients with very low likelihood of CAD in whom further testing can be deferred.https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.122.027260chronic coronary syndromecomputed tomography angiographycoronary artery diseasecoronary stenosispretest probabilitystable coronary artery disease
spellingShingle Simon Winther
Theodore Murphy
Samuel Emil Schmidt
Jeroen J. Bax
William Wijns
Juhani Knuuti
Morten Bøttcher
Performance of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Guideline‐Recommended Pretest Probability Model for the Diagnosis of Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease
Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
chronic coronary syndrome
computed tomography angiography
coronary artery disease
coronary stenosis
pretest probability
stable coronary artery disease
title Performance of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Guideline‐Recommended Pretest Probability Model for the Diagnosis of Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease
title_full Performance of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Guideline‐Recommended Pretest Probability Model for the Diagnosis of Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease
title_fullStr Performance of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Guideline‐Recommended Pretest Probability Model for the Diagnosis of Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease
title_full_unstemmed Performance of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Guideline‐Recommended Pretest Probability Model for the Diagnosis of Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease
title_short Performance of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Guideline‐Recommended Pretest Probability Model for the Diagnosis of Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease
title_sort performance of the american heart association american college of cardiology guideline recommended pretest probability model for the diagnosis of obstructive coronary artery disease
topic chronic coronary syndrome
computed tomography angiography
coronary artery disease
coronary stenosis
pretest probability
stable coronary artery disease
url https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.122.027260
work_keys_str_mv AT simonwinther performanceoftheamericanheartassociationamericancollegeofcardiologyguidelinerecommendedpretestprobabilitymodelforthediagnosisofobstructivecoronaryarterydisease
AT theodoremurphy performanceoftheamericanheartassociationamericancollegeofcardiologyguidelinerecommendedpretestprobabilitymodelforthediagnosisofobstructivecoronaryarterydisease
AT samuelemilschmidt performanceoftheamericanheartassociationamericancollegeofcardiologyguidelinerecommendedpretestprobabilitymodelforthediagnosisofobstructivecoronaryarterydisease
AT jeroenjbax performanceoftheamericanheartassociationamericancollegeofcardiologyguidelinerecommendedpretestprobabilitymodelforthediagnosisofobstructivecoronaryarterydisease
AT williamwijns performanceoftheamericanheartassociationamericancollegeofcardiologyguidelinerecommendedpretestprobabilitymodelforthediagnosisofobstructivecoronaryarterydisease
AT juhaniknuuti performanceoftheamericanheartassociationamericancollegeofcardiologyguidelinerecommendedpretestprobabilitymodelforthediagnosisofobstructivecoronaryarterydisease
AT mortenbøttcher performanceoftheamericanheartassociationamericancollegeofcardiologyguidelinerecommendedpretestprobabilitymodelforthediagnosisofobstructivecoronaryarterydisease