Knockdown Arguments
Two brainless curs, Alan Brinton and Douglas Walton, have recently had the impudence to suggest that several of my views on argumentum ad baculum are mistaken. While hardship and toil await them in this life and eternal damnation in the next, punishment begins with this paper. In it, I clarify my po...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of Windsor
1995-01-01
|
Series: | Informal Logic |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://informallogic.ca/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/2421 |
_version_ | 1818020037988974592 |
---|---|
author | Michael Wreen |
author_facet | Michael Wreen |
author_sort | Michael Wreen |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Two brainless curs, Alan Brinton and Douglas Walton, have recently had the impudence to suggest that several of my views on argumentum ad baculum are mistaken. While hardship and toil await them in this life and eternal damnation in the next, punishment begins with this paper. In it, I clarify my position, defend my views, and critique their arguments. Last, I argue ad baculum against both of them, threatening both with the loss of reputation, employment, and respect unless they repudiate every objection raised against me and publicly abase themselves. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-14T08:00:36Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-b1d23f71464e4908bd218a7797a70c3f |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 0824-2577 2293-734X |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-14T08:00:36Z |
publishDate | 1995-01-01 |
publisher | University of Windsor |
record_format | Article |
series | Informal Logic |
spelling | doaj.art-b1d23f71464e4908bd218a7797a70c3f2022-12-22T02:04:55ZengUniversity of WindsorInformal Logic0824-25772293-734X1995-01-0117310.22329/il.v17i3.2421Knockdown ArgumentsMichael WreenTwo brainless curs, Alan Brinton and Douglas Walton, have recently had the impudence to suggest that several of my views on argumentum ad baculum are mistaken. While hardship and toil await them in this life and eternal damnation in the next, punishment begins with this paper. In it, I clarify my position, defend my views, and critique their arguments. Last, I argue ad baculum against both of them, threatening both with the loss of reputation, employment, and respect unless they repudiate every objection raised against me and publicly abase themselves.https://informallogic.ca/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/2421argumentum ad baculumad baculum fallacyfearthreatdialectical approach to argumentationrhetorical approach to argumentation |
spellingShingle | Michael Wreen Knockdown Arguments Informal Logic argumentum ad baculum ad baculum fallacy fear threat dialectical approach to argumentation rhetorical approach to argumentation |
title | Knockdown Arguments |
title_full | Knockdown Arguments |
title_fullStr | Knockdown Arguments |
title_full_unstemmed | Knockdown Arguments |
title_short | Knockdown Arguments |
title_sort | knockdown arguments |
topic | argumentum ad baculum ad baculum fallacy fear threat dialectical approach to argumentation rhetorical approach to argumentation |
url | https://informallogic.ca/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/2421 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT michaelwreen knockdownarguments |