Knockdown Arguments

Two brainless curs, Alan Brinton and Douglas Walton, have recently had the impudence to suggest that several of my views on argumentum ad baculum are mistaken. While hardship and toil await them in this life and eternal damnation in the next, punishment begins with this paper. In it, I clarify my po...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Michael Wreen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Windsor 1995-01-01
Series:Informal Logic
Subjects:
Online Access:https://informallogic.ca/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/2421
_version_ 1818020037988974592
author Michael Wreen
author_facet Michael Wreen
author_sort Michael Wreen
collection DOAJ
description Two brainless curs, Alan Brinton and Douglas Walton, have recently had the impudence to suggest that several of my views on argumentum ad baculum are mistaken. While hardship and toil await them in this life and eternal damnation in the next, punishment begins with this paper. In it, I clarify my position, defend my views, and critique their arguments. Last, I argue ad baculum against both of them, threatening both with the loss of reputation, employment, and respect unless they repudiate every objection raised against me and publicly abase themselves.
first_indexed 2024-04-14T08:00:36Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b1d23f71464e4908bd218a7797a70c3f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0824-2577
2293-734X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-14T08:00:36Z
publishDate 1995-01-01
publisher University of Windsor
record_format Article
series Informal Logic
spelling doaj.art-b1d23f71464e4908bd218a7797a70c3f2022-12-22T02:04:55ZengUniversity of WindsorInformal Logic0824-25772293-734X1995-01-0117310.22329/il.v17i3.2421Knockdown ArgumentsMichael WreenTwo brainless curs, Alan Brinton and Douglas Walton, have recently had the impudence to suggest that several of my views on argumentum ad baculum are mistaken. While hardship and toil await them in this life and eternal damnation in the next, punishment begins with this paper. In it, I clarify my position, defend my views, and critique their arguments. Last, I argue ad baculum against both of them, threatening both with the loss of reputation, employment, and respect unless they repudiate every objection raised against me and publicly abase themselves.https://informallogic.ca/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/2421argumentum ad baculumad baculum fallacyfearthreatdialectical approach to argumentationrhetorical approach to argumentation
spellingShingle Michael Wreen
Knockdown Arguments
Informal Logic
argumentum ad baculum
ad baculum fallacy
fear
threat
dialectical approach to argumentation
rhetorical approach to argumentation
title Knockdown Arguments
title_full Knockdown Arguments
title_fullStr Knockdown Arguments
title_full_unstemmed Knockdown Arguments
title_short Knockdown Arguments
title_sort knockdown arguments
topic argumentum ad baculum
ad baculum fallacy
fear
threat
dialectical approach to argumentation
rhetorical approach to argumentation
url https://informallogic.ca/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/2421
work_keys_str_mv AT michaelwreen knockdownarguments