Raven’s Standard Progressive Matrices for Adolescents: A Case for a Shortened Version

Cognitive ability of adolescents is often measured using the Raven’s Standard Progressive Matrices (RSPM). However, the RSPM knows a long administration time which may be suboptimal, as time-on-task effects are known to increase fatigue, to lower motivation, and to worsen performance on cognitive ta...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anne-Wil Kramer, Hilde M. Huizenga
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-04-01
Series:Journal of Intelligence
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2079-3200/11/4/72
_version_ 1797604897721417728
author Anne-Wil Kramer
Hilde M. Huizenga
author_facet Anne-Wil Kramer
Hilde M. Huizenga
author_sort Anne-Wil Kramer
collection DOAJ
description Cognitive ability of adolescents is often measured using the Raven’s Standard Progressive Matrices (RSPM). However, the RSPM knows a long administration time which may be suboptimal, as time-on-task effects are known to increase fatigue, to lower motivation, and to worsen performance on cognitive tasks. Therefore, a shortened version for adolescents was developed recently. In the current preregistered study we investigated this shortened version in a sample of adolescents (N = 99) of average educational backgrounds. We tested whether the shortened RSPM is a valid alternative to the original RSPM, which proved to be the case, as we observed a moderate to high correlation between the two versions. Moreover, we tested version effects on fatigue, motivation and performance. Fatigue was lower and motivation was higher after completing the short compared to the original version, and performance was better in the short compared to the original version. However, additional analyses suggested that beneficial version effects on performance were not due to reduced time-on-task, but due to the short version containing less difficult items than the original version. Moreover, version related differences in performance were not related to version related differences in fatigue and motivation. We conclude that the shortened version of the RSPM is a valid alternative to the original version, and that the shortened version is beneficial in terms of fatigue and motivation, but that these beneficial effects on fatigue and motivation do not carry over to performance.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T04:53:17Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b1d370dcb5b74752a0dc9bf880e4c3a0
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2079-3200
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T04:53:17Z
publishDate 2023-04-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Journal of Intelligence
spelling doaj.art-b1d370dcb5b74752a0dc9bf880e4c3a02023-11-17T19:54:02ZengMDPI AGJournal of Intelligence2079-32002023-04-011147210.3390/jintelligence11040072Raven’s Standard Progressive Matrices for Adolescents: A Case for a Shortened VersionAnne-Wil Kramer0Hilde M. Huizenga1Department of Developmental Psychology, University of Amsterdam, 1018 WS Amsterdam, The NetherlandsDepartment of Developmental Psychology, University of Amsterdam, 1018 WS Amsterdam, The NetherlandsCognitive ability of adolescents is often measured using the Raven’s Standard Progressive Matrices (RSPM). However, the RSPM knows a long administration time which may be suboptimal, as time-on-task effects are known to increase fatigue, to lower motivation, and to worsen performance on cognitive tasks. Therefore, a shortened version for adolescents was developed recently. In the current preregistered study we investigated this shortened version in a sample of adolescents (N = 99) of average educational backgrounds. We tested whether the shortened RSPM is a valid alternative to the original RSPM, which proved to be the case, as we observed a moderate to high correlation between the two versions. Moreover, we tested version effects on fatigue, motivation and performance. Fatigue was lower and motivation was higher after completing the short compared to the original version, and performance was better in the short compared to the original version. However, additional analyses suggested that beneficial version effects on performance were not due to reduced time-on-task, but due to the short version containing less difficult items than the original version. Moreover, version related differences in performance were not related to version related differences in fatigue and motivation. We conclude that the shortened version of the RSPM is a valid alternative to the original version, and that the shortened version is beneficial in terms of fatigue and motivation, but that these beneficial effects on fatigue and motivation do not carry over to performance.https://www.mdpi.com/2079-3200/11/4/72Raven’s standard progressive matricesshort versionfatiguemotivationadolescents
spellingShingle Anne-Wil Kramer
Hilde M. Huizenga
Raven’s Standard Progressive Matrices for Adolescents: A Case for a Shortened Version
Journal of Intelligence
Raven’s standard progressive matrices
short version
fatigue
motivation
adolescents
title Raven’s Standard Progressive Matrices for Adolescents: A Case for a Shortened Version
title_full Raven’s Standard Progressive Matrices for Adolescents: A Case for a Shortened Version
title_fullStr Raven’s Standard Progressive Matrices for Adolescents: A Case for a Shortened Version
title_full_unstemmed Raven’s Standard Progressive Matrices for Adolescents: A Case for a Shortened Version
title_short Raven’s Standard Progressive Matrices for Adolescents: A Case for a Shortened Version
title_sort raven s standard progressive matrices for adolescents a case for a shortened version
topic Raven’s standard progressive matrices
short version
fatigue
motivation
adolescents
url https://www.mdpi.com/2079-3200/11/4/72
work_keys_str_mv AT annewilkramer ravensstandardprogressivematricesforadolescentsacaseforashortenedversion
AT hildemhuizenga ravensstandardprogressivematricesforadolescentsacaseforashortenedversion