Effects of preconception lifestyle intervention in infertile women with obesity: The FIT-PLESE randomized controlled trial.

<h4>Background</h4>Women with obesity and infertility are counseled to lose weight prior to conception and infertility treatment to improve pregnancy rates and birth outcomes, although confirmatory evidence from randomized trials is lacking. We assessed whether a preconception intensive...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Richard S Legro, Karl R Hansen, Michael P Diamond, Anne Z Steiner, Christos Coutifaris, Marcelle I Cedars, Kathleen M Hoeger, Rebecca Usadi, Erica B Johnstone, Daniel J Haisenleder, Robert A Wild, Kurt T Barnhart, Jennifer Mersereau, J C Trussell, Stephen A Krawetz, Penny M Kris-Etherton, David B Sarwer, Nanette Santoro, Esther Eisenberg, Hao Huang, Heping Zhang, Reproductive Medicine Network
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2022-01-01
Series:PLoS Medicine
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003883
_version_ 1797787210808819712
author Richard S Legro
Karl R Hansen
Michael P Diamond
Anne Z Steiner
Christos Coutifaris
Marcelle I Cedars
Kathleen M Hoeger
Rebecca Usadi
Erica B Johnstone
Daniel J Haisenleder
Robert A Wild
Kurt T Barnhart
Jennifer Mersereau
J C Trussell
Stephen A Krawetz
Penny M Kris-Etherton
David B Sarwer
Nanette Santoro
Esther Eisenberg
Hao Huang
Heping Zhang
Reproductive Medicine Network
author_facet Richard S Legro
Karl R Hansen
Michael P Diamond
Anne Z Steiner
Christos Coutifaris
Marcelle I Cedars
Kathleen M Hoeger
Rebecca Usadi
Erica B Johnstone
Daniel J Haisenleder
Robert A Wild
Kurt T Barnhart
Jennifer Mersereau
J C Trussell
Stephen A Krawetz
Penny M Kris-Etherton
David B Sarwer
Nanette Santoro
Esther Eisenberg
Hao Huang
Heping Zhang
Reproductive Medicine Network
author_sort Richard S Legro
collection DOAJ
description <h4>Background</h4>Women with obesity and infertility are counseled to lose weight prior to conception and infertility treatment to improve pregnancy rates and birth outcomes, although confirmatory evidence from randomized trials is lacking. We assessed whether a preconception intensive lifestyle intervention with acute weight loss is superior to a weight neutral intervention at achieving a healthy live birth.<h4>Methods and findings</h4>In this open-label, randomized controlled study (FIT-PLESE), 379 women with obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2) and unexplained infertility were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to 2 preconception lifestyle modification groups lasting 16 weeks, between July 2015 and July 2018 (final follow-up September 2019) followed by infertility therapy. The primary outcome was the healthy live birth (term infant of normal weight without major anomalies) incidence. This was conducted at 9 academic health centers across the United States. The intensive group underwent increased physical activity and weight loss (target 7%) through meal replacements and medication (Orlistat) compared to a standard group with increased physical activity alone without weight loss. This was followed by standardized empiric infertility treatment consisting of 3 cycles of ovarian stimulation/intrauterine insemination. Outcomes of any resulting pregnancy were tracked. Among 191 women randomized to standard lifestyle group, 40 dropped out of the study before conception; among 188 women randomized to intensive lifestyle group, 31 dropped out of the study before conception. All the randomized women were included in the intent-to-treat analysis for primary outcome of a healthy live birth. There were no significant differences in the incidence of healthy live births [standard 29/191(15.2%), intensive 23/188(12.2%), rate ratio 0.81 (0.48 to 1.34), P = 0.40]. Intensive had significant weight loss compared to standard (-6.6 ± 5.4% versus -0.3 ± 3.2%, P < 0.001). There were improvements in metabolic health, including a marked decrease in incidence of the metabolic syndrome (baseline to 16 weeks: standard: 53.6% to 49.4%, intensive 52.8% to 32.2%, P = 0.003). Gastrointestinal side effects were significantly more common in intensive. There was a higher, but nonsignificant, first trimester pregnancy loss in the intensive group (33.3% versus 23.7% in standard, 95% rate ratio 1.40, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.79 to 2.50). The main limitations of the study are the limited power of the study to detect rare complications and the design difficulty in finding an adequate time matched control intervention, as the standard exercise intervention may have potentially been helpful or harmful.<h4>Conclusions</h4>A preconception intensive lifestyle intervention for weight loss did not improve fertility or birth outcomes compared to an exercise intervention without targeted weight loss. Improvement in metabolic health may not translate into improved female fecundity.<h4>Trial registration</h4>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02432209.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T01:19:43Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b1e2594322e54b859f55db99399711c4
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1549-1277
1549-1676
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T01:19:43Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS Medicine
spelling doaj.art-b1e2594322e54b859f55db99399711c42023-07-05T05:30:50ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS Medicine1549-12771549-16762022-01-01191e100388310.1371/journal.pmed.1003883Effects of preconception lifestyle intervention in infertile women with obesity: The FIT-PLESE randomized controlled trial.Richard S LegroKarl R HansenMichael P DiamondAnne Z SteinerChristos CoutifarisMarcelle I CedarsKathleen M HoegerRebecca UsadiErica B JohnstoneDaniel J HaisenlederRobert A WildKurt T BarnhartJennifer MersereauJ C TrussellStephen A KrawetzPenny M Kris-EthertonDavid B SarwerNanette SantoroEsther EisenbergHao HuangHeping ZhangReproductive Medicine Network<h4>Background</h4>Women with obesity and infertility are counseled to lose weight prior to conception and infertility treatment to improve pregnancy rates and birth outcomes, although confirmatory evidence from randomized trials is lacking. We assessed whether a preconception intensive lifestyle intervention with acute weight loss is superior to a weight neutral intervention at achieving a healthy live birth.<h4>Methods and findings</h4>In this open-label, randomized controlled study (FIT-PLESE), 379 women with obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2) and unexplained infertility were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to 2 preconception lifestyle modification groups lasting 16 weeks, between July 2015 and July 2018 (final follow-up September 2019) followed by infertility therapy. The primary outcome was the healthy live birth (term infant of normal weight without major anomalies) incidence. This was conducted at 9 academic health centers across the United States. The intensive group underwent increased physical activity and weight loss (target 7%) through meal replacements and medication (Orlistat) compared to a standard group with increased physical activity alone without weight loss. This was followed by standardized empiric infertility treatment consisting of 3 cycles of ovarian stimulation/intrauterine insemination. Outcomes of any resulting pregnancy were tracked. Among 191 women randomized to standard lifestyle group, 40 dropped out of the study before conception; among 188 women randomized to intensive lifestyle group, 31 dropped out of the study before conception. All the randomized women were included in the intent-to-treat analysis for primary outcome of a healthy live birth. There were no significant differences in the incidence of healthy live births [standard 29/191(15.2%), intensive 23/188(12.2%), rate ratio 0.81 (0.48 to 1.34), P = 0.40]. Intensive had significant weight loss compared to standard (-6.6 ± 5.4% versus -0.3 ± 3.2%, P < 0.001). There were improvements in metabolic health, including a marked decrease in incidence of the metabolic syndrome (baseline to 16 weeks: standard: 53.6% to 49.4%, intensive 52.8% to 32.2%, P = 0.003). Gastrointestinal side effects were significantly more common in intensive. There was a higher, but nonsignificant, first trimester pregnancy loss in the intensive group (33.3% versus 23.7% in standard, 95% rate ratio 1.40, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.79 to 2.50). The main limitations of the study are the limited power of the study to detect rare complications and the design difficulty in finding an adequate time matched control intervention, as the standard exercise intervention may have potentially been helpful or harmful.<h4>Conclusions</h4>A preconception intensive lifestyle intervention for weight loss did not improve fertility or birth outcomes compared to an exercise intervention without targeted weight loss. Improvement in metabolic health may not translate into improved female fecundity.<h4>Trial registration</h4>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02432209.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003883
spellingShingle Richard S Legro
Karl R Hansen
Michael P Diamond
Anne Z Steiner
Christos Coutifaris
Marcelle I Cedars
Kathleen M Hoeger
Rebecca Usadi
Erica B Johnstone
Daniel J Haisenleder
Robert A Wild
Kurt T Barnhart
Jennifer Mersereau
J C Trussell
Stephen A Krawetz
Penny M Kris-Etherton
David B Sarwer
Nanette Santoro
Esther Eisenberg
Hao Huang
Heping Zhang
Reproductive Medicine Network
Effects of preconception lifestyle intervention in infertile women with obesity: The FIT-PLESE randomized controlled trial.
PLoS Medicine
title Effects of preconception lifestyle intervention in infertile women with obesity: The FIT-PLESE randomized controlled trial.
title_full Effects of preconception lifestyle intervention in infertile women with obesity: The FIT-PLESE randomized controlled trial.
title_fullStr Effects of preconception lifestyle intervention in infertile women with obesity: The FIT-PLESE randomized controlled trial.
title_full_unstemmed Effects of preconception lifestyle intervention in infertile women with obesity: The FIT-PLESE randomized controlled trial.
title_short Effects of preconception lifestyle intervention in infertile women with obesity: The FIT-PLESE randomized controlled trial.
title_sort effects of preconception lifestyle intervention in infertile women with obesity the fit plese randomized controlled trial
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003883
work_keys_str_mv AT richardslegro effectsofpreconceptionlifestyleinterventionininfertilewomenwithobesitythefitpleserandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT karlrhansen effectsofpreconceptionlifestyleinterventionininfertilewomenwithobesitythefitpleserandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT michaelpdiamond effectsofpreconceptionlifestyleinterventionininfertilewomenwithobesitythefitpleserandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT annezsteiner effectsofpreconceptionlifestyleinterventionininfertilewomenwithobesitythefitpleserandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT christoscoutifaris effectsofpreconceptionlifestyleinterventionininfertilewomenwithobesitythefitpleserandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT marcelleicedars effectsofpreconceptionlifestyleinterventionininfertilewomenwithobesitythefitpleserandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kathleenmhoeger effectsofpreconceptionlifestyleinterventionininfertilewomenwithobesitythefitpleserandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT rebeccausadi effectsofpreconceptionlifestyleinterventionininfertilewomenwithobesitythefitpleserandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT ericabjohnstone effectsofpreconceptionlifestyleinterventionininfertilewomenwithobesitythefitpleserandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT danieljhaisenleder effectsofpreconceptionlifestyleinterventionininfertilewomenwithobesitythefitpleserandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT robertawild effectsofpreconceptionlifestyleinterventionininfertilewomenwithobesitythefitpleserandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kurttbarnhart effectsofpreconceptionlifestyleinterventionininfertilewomenwithobesitythefitpleserandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT jennifermersereau effectsofpreconceptionlifestyleinterventionininfertilewomenwithobesitythefitpleserandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT jctrussell effectsofpreconceptionlifestyleinterventionininfertilewomenwithobesitythefitpleserandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT stephenakrawetz effectsofpreconceptionlifestyleinterventionininfertilewomenwithobesitythefitpleserandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT pennymkrisetherton effectsofpreconceptionlifestyleinterventionininfertilewomenwithobesitythefitpleserandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT davidbsarwer effectsofpreconceptionlifestyleinterventionininfertilewomenwithobesitythefitpleserandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT nanettesantoro effectsofpreconceptionlifestyleinterventionininfertilewomenwithobesitythefitpleserandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT esthereisenberg effectsofpreconceptionlifestyleinterventionininfertilewomenwithobesitythefitpleserandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT haohuang effectsofpreconceptionlifestyleinterventionininfertilewomenwithobesitythefitpleserandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hepingzhang effectsofpreconceptionlifestyleinterventionininfertilewomenwithobesitythefitpleserandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT reproductivemedicinenetwork effectsofpreconceptionlifestyleinterventionininfertilewomenwithobesitythefitpleserandomizedcontrolledtrial