Electric Powertrain Topology Analysis and Design for Heavy-Duty Trucks

Powertrain system design optimization is an unexplored territory for battery electric trucks, which only recently have been seen as a feasible solution for sustainable road transport. To investigate the potential of these vehicles, in this paper, a variety of new battery electric powertrain topologi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Frans J. R. Verbruggen, Emilia Silvas, Theo Hofman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-05-01
Series:Energies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/10/2434
_version_ 1797568183576559616
author Frans J. R. Verbruggen
Emilia Silvas
Theo Hofman
author_facet Frans J. R. Verbruggen
Emilia Silvas
Theo Hofman
author_sort Frans J. R. Verbruggen
collection DOAJ
description Powertrain system design optimization is an unexplored territory for battery electric trucks, which only recently have been seen as a feasible solution for sustainable road transport. To investigate the potential of these vehicles, in this paper, a variety of new battery electric powertrain topologies for heavy-duty trucks is studied. Thereby, topological design considerations are analyzed related to having: (a) a central or distributed drive system (individually-driven wheels); (b) a single or a multi-speed gearbox; and finally, (c) a single or multiple electric machines. For reasons of comparison, each concurrent powertrain topology is optimized using a bilevel optimization framework, incorporating both powertrain components and control design. The results show that the combined choice of powertrain topology and number of gears in the gearbox can result in a 5.6% total-cost-of-ownership variation of the vehicle and can, significantly, influence the optimal sizing of the electric machine(s). The lowest total-cost-of-ownership is achieved by a distributed topology with two electric machines and two two-speed gearboxes. Furthermore, results show that the largest average reduction in total-cost-of-ownership is achieved by choosing a distributed drive over a central drive topology (−1.0%); followed by using a two-speed gearbox over a single speed (−0.6%); and lastly, by using two electric machines over using one for the central drive topologies (−0.3%).
first_indexed 2024-03-10T19:52:51Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b1ef9427c77740249b945f291aa210d0
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1996-1073
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T19:52:51Z
publishDate 2020-05-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Energies
spelling doaj.art-b1ef9427c77740249b945f291aa210d02023-11-20T00:14:28ZengMDPI AGEnergies1996-10732020-05-011310243410.3390/en13102434Electric Powertrain Topology Analysis and Design for Heavy-Duty TrucksFrans J. R. Verbruggen0Emilia Silvas1Theo Hofman2Department of Mechanical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, P.O. Box 513, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The NetherlandsDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, P.O. Box 513, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The NetherlandsDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, P.O. Box 513, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The NetherlandsPowertrain system design optimization is an unexplored territory for battery electric trucks, which only recently have been seen as a feasible solution for sustainable road transport. To investigate the potential of these vehicles, in this paper, a variety of new battery electric powertrain topologies for heavy-duty trucks is studied. Thereby, topological design considerations are analyzed related to having: (a) a central or distributed drive system (individually-driven wheels); (b) a single or a multi-speed gearbox; and finally, (c) a single or multiple electric machines. For reasons of comparison, each concurrent powertrain topology is optimized using a bilevel optimization framework, incorporating both powertrain components and control design. The results show that the combined choice of powertrain topology and number of gears in the gearbox can result in a 5.6% total-cost-of-ownership variation of the vehicle and can, significantly, influence the optimal sizing of the electric machine(s). The lowest total-cost-of-ownership is achieved by a distributed topology with two electric machines and two two-speed gearboxes. Furthermore, results show that the largest average reduction in total-cost-of-ownership is achieved by choosing a distributed drive over a central drive topology (−1.0%); followed by using a two-speed gearbox over a single speed (−0.6%); and lastly, by using two electric machines over using one for the central drive topologies (−0.3%).https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/10/2434powertrainsoptimizationelectric vehiclestopology design
spellingShingle Frans J. R. Verbruggen
Emilia Silvas
Theo Hofman
Electric Powertrain Topology Analysis and Design for Heavy-Duty Trucks
Energies
powertrains
optimization
electric vehicles
topology design
title Electric Powertrain Topology Analysis and Design for Heavy-Duty Trucks
title_full Electric Powertrain Topology Analysis and Design for Heavy-Duty Trucks
title_fullStr Electric Powertrain Topology Analysis and Design for Heavy-Duty Trucks
title_full_unstemmed Electric Powertrain Topology Analysis and Design for Heavy-Duty Trucks
title_short Electric Powertrain Topology Analysis and Design for Heavy-Duty Trucks
title_sort electric powertrain topology analysis and design for heavy duty trucks
topic powertrains
optimization
electric vehicles
topology design
url https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/10/2434
work_keys_str_mv AT fransjrverbruggen electricpowertraintopologyanalysisanddesignforheavydutytrucks
AT emiliasilvas electricpowertraintopologyanalysisanddesignforheavydutytrucks
AT theohofman electricpowertraintopologyanalysisanddesignforheavydutytrucks