Design considerations for clinical trials in aphasia
The use of the randomised controlled trial (RCT) design to evaluate the effectiveness of new interventions in aphasia has increased in recent years in response to calls for high quality evidence of the effectiveness of interventions for this population. This view-point article highlights some of the...
Main Author: | Rebecca Palmer |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2020-01-01
|
Series: | Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.annalsofian.org/article.asp?issn=0972-2327;year=2020;volume=23;issue=8;spage=52;epage=56;aulast=Palmer |
Similar Items
-
Statistical analysis plan for the COMPARE trial: a 3-arm randomised controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of Constraint-induced Aphasia Therapy Plus and Multi-modality Aphasia Therapy to usual care in chronic post-stroke aphasia (COMPARE)
by: Miranda L. Rose, et al.
Published: (2021-04-01) -
Treatment fidelity monitoring, reporting and findings in a complex aphasia intervention trial: a substudy of the Very Early Rehabilitation in SpEech (VERSE) trial
by: Erin Godecke, et al.
Published: (2022-06-01) -
Adjustment with aphasia after stroke: study protocol for a pilot feasibility randomised controlled trial for SUpporting wellbeing through PEeR Befriending (SUPERB)
by: Katerina Hilari, et al.
Published: (2019-01-01) -
Speech Entrainment for Aphasia Recovery (SpARc) phase II trial design
by: Christy Cassarly, et al.
Published: (2021-12-01) -
Designing nutrition-based interventional trials for the future: addressing the known knowns
by: Danielle E. Bear, et al.
Published: (2019-02-01)