Reliability of the Granger causality inference

How to characterize information flows in physical, biological, and social systems remains a major theoretical challenge. Granger causality (GC) analysis has been widely used to investigate information flow through causal interactions. We address one of the central questions in GC analysis, that is,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Douglas Zhou, Yaoyu Zhang, Yanyang Xiao, David Cai
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IOP Publishing 2014-01-01
Series:New Journal of Physics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/16/4/043016
_version_ 1827874270842191872
author Douglas Zhou
Yaoyu Zhang
Yanyang Xiao
David Cai
author_facet Douglas Zhou
Yaoyu Zhang
Yanyang Xiao
David Cai
author_sort Douglas Zhou
collection DOAJ
description How to characterize information flows in physical, biological, and social systems remains a major theoretical challenge. Granger causality (GC) analysis has been widely used to investigate information flow through causal interactions. We address one of the central questions in GC analysis, that is, the reliability of the GC evaluation and its implications for the causal structures extracted by this analysis. Our work reveals that the manner in which a continuous dynamical process is projected or coarse-grained to a discrete process has a profound impact on the reliability of the GC inference, and different sampling may potentially yield completely opposite inferences. This inference hazard is present for both linear and nonlinear processes. We emphasize that there is a hazard of reaching incorrect conclusions about network topologies, even including statistical (such as small-world or scale-free) properties of the networks, when GC analysis is blindly applied to infer the network topology. We demonstrate this using a small-world network for which a drastic loss of small-world attributes occurs in the reconstructed network using the standard GC approach. We further show how to resolve the paradox that the GC analysis seemingly becomes less reliable when more information is incorporated using finer and finer sampling. Finally, we present strategies to overcome these inference artifacts in order to obtain a reliable GC result.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T16:49:52Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b20d92f342dc46a7bb72eeb279c826a5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1367-2630
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T16:49:52Z
publishDate 2014-01-01
publisher IOP Publishing
record_format Article
series New Journal of Physics
spelling doaj.art-b20d92f342dc46a7bb72eeb279c826a52023-08-08T11:24:43ZengIOP PublishingNew Journal of Physics1367-26302014-01-0116404301610.1088/1367-2630/16/4/043016Reliability of the Granger causality inferenceDouglas Zhou0Yaoyu Zhang1Yanyang Xiao2David Cai3Department of Mathematics, MOE-LSC, and Institute of Natural Sciences, Shanghai Jiao Tong University , Shanghai 200240, People's Republic of ChinaDepartment of Mathematics, MOE-LSC, and Institute of Natural Sciences, Shanghai Jiao Tong University , Shanghai 200240, People's Republic of ChinaDepartment of Mathematics, MOE-LSC, and Institute of Natural Sciences, Shanghai Jiao Tong University , Shanghai 200240, People's Republic of ChinaDepartment of Mathematics, MOE-LSC, and Institute of Natural Sciences, Shanghai Jiao Tong University , Shanghai 200240, People's Republic of China; Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences & Center for Neural Science, New York University , New York, NY 10012, USA; NYUAD Institute, New York University Abu Dhabi , PO Box 129188, Abu Dhabi, UAEHow to characterize information flows in physical, biological, and social systems remains a major theoretical challenge. Granger causality (GC) analysis has been widely used to investigate information flow through causal interactions. We address one of the central questions in GC analysis, that is, the reliability of the GC evaluation and its implications for the causal structures extracted by this analysis. Our work reveals that the manner in which a continuous dynamical process is projected or coarse-grained to a discrete process has a profound impact on the reliability of the GC inference, and different sampling may potentially yield completely opposite inferences. This inference hazard is present for both linear and nonlinear processes. We emphasize that there is a hazard of reaching incorrect conclusions about network topologies, even including statistical (such as small-world or scale-free) properties of the networks, when GC analysis is blindly applied to infer the network topology. We demonstrate this using a small-world network for which a drastic loss of small-world attributes occurs in the reconstructed network using the standard GC approach. We further show how to resolve the paradox that the GC analysis seemingly becomes less reliable when more information is incorporated using finer and finer sampling. Finally, we present strategies to overcome these inference artifacts in order to obtain a reliable GC result.https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/16/4/043016causal information flowreliability of causal inferencesampling hazardssmall-world topology05.45.Tp02.50.Tt
spellingShingle Douglas Zhou
Yaoyu Zhang
Yanyang Xiao
David Cai
Reliability of the Granger causality inference
New Journal of Physics
causal information flow
reliability of causal inference
sampling hazards
small-world topology
05.45.Tp
02.50.Tt
title Reliability of the Granger causality inference
title_full Reliability of the Granger causality inference
title_fullStr Reliability of the Granger causality inference
title_full_unstemmed Reliability of the Granger causality inference
title_short Reliability of the Granger causality inference
title_sort reliability of the granger causality inference
topic causal information flow
reliability of causal inference
sampling hazards
small-world topology
05.45.Tp
02.50.Tt
url https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/16/4/043016
work_keys_str_mv AT douglaszhou reliabilityofthegrangercausalityinference
AT yaoyuzhang reliabilityofthegrangercausalityinference
AT yanyangxiao reliabilityofthegrangercausalityinference
AT davidcai reliabilityofthegrangercausalityinference