Replication of the natural selection of bad science

This study reports an independent replication of the findings presented by Smaldino and McElreath (Smaldino, McElreath 2016 R. Soc. Open Sci. 3, 160384 (doi:10.1098/rsos.160384)). The replication was successful with one exception. We find that selection acting on scientist’s propensity for replicati...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Florian Kohrt, Paul E. Smaldino, Richard McElreath, Felix Schönbrodt
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The Royal Society 2023-02-01
Series:Royal Society Open Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsos.221306
_version_ 1827589653290549248
author Florian Kohrt
Paul E. Smaldino
Richard McElreath
Felix Schönbrodt
author_facet Florian Kohrt
Paul E. Smaldino
Richard McElreath
Felix Schönbrodt
author_sort Florian Kohrt
collection DOAJ
description This study reports an independent replication of the findings presented by Smaldino and McElreath (Smaldino, McElreath 2016 R. Soc. Open Sci. 3, 160384 (doi:10.1098/rsos.160384)). The replication was successful with one exception. We find that selection acting on scientist’s propensity for replication frequency caused a brief period of exuberant replication not observed in the original paper due to a coding error. This difference does not, however, change the authors’ original conclusions. We call for more replication studies for simulations as unique contributions to scientific quality assurance.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T01:04:59Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b21aa088c3b84042a1f0268656b569a0
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2054-5703
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T01:04:59Z
publishDate 2023-02-01
publisher The Royal Society
record_format Article
series Royal Society Open Science
spelling doaj.art-b21aa088c3b84042a1f0268656b569a02023-12-11T10:53:22ZengThe Royal SocietyRoyal Society Open Science2054-57032023-02-0110210.1098/rsos.221306Replication of the natural selection of bad scienceFlorian Kohrt0Paul E. Smaldino1Richard McElreath2Felix Schönbrodt3Department of Psychology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, GermanyDepartment of Cognitive and Information Sciences, University of California, Merced, CA 95343, USADepartment of Human Behavior, Ecology, and Culture, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, GermanyDepartment of Psychology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, GermanyThis study reports an independent replication of the findings presented by Smaldino and McElreath (Smaldino, McElreath 2016 R. Soc. Open Sci. 3, 160384 (doi:10.1098/rsos.160384)). The replication was successful with one exception. We find that selection acting on scientist’s propensity for replication frequency caused a brief period of exuberant replication not observed in the original paper due to a coding error. This difference does not, however, change the authors’ original conclusions. We call for more replication studies for simulations as unique contributions to scientific quality assurance.https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsos.221306agent-based modelreplicationmetasciencecultural evolutionincentives
spellingShingle Florian Kohrt
Paul E. Smaldino
Richard McElreath
Felix Schönbrodt
Replication of the natural selection of bad science
Royal Society Open Science
agent-based model
replication
metascience
cultural evolution
incentives
title Replication of the natural selection of bad science
title_full Replication of the natural selection of bad science
title_fullStr Replication of the natural selection of bad science
title_full_unstemmed Replication of the natural selection of bad science
title_short Replication of the natural selection of bad science
title_sort replication of the natural selection of bad science
topic agent-based model
replication
metascience
cultural evolution
incentives
url https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsos.221306
work_keys_str_mv AT floriankohrt replicationofthenaturalselectionofbadscience
AT paulesmaldino replicationofthenaturalselectionofbadscience
AT richardmcelreath replicationofthenaturalselectionofbadscience
AT felixschonbrodt replicationofthenaturalselectionofbadscience