Replication of the natural selection of bad science
This study reports an independent replication of the findings presented by Smaldino and McElreath (Smaldino, McElreath 2016 R. Soc. Open Sci. 3, 160384 (doi:10.1098/rsos.160384)). The replication was successful with one exception. We find that selection acting on scientist’s propensity for replicati...
Main Authors: | Florian Kohrt, Paul E. Smaldino, Richard McElreath, Felix Schönbrodt |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
The Royal Society
2023-02-01
|
Series: | Royal Society Open Science |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsos.221306 |
Similar Items
-
The natural selection of bad science
by: Paul E. Smaldino, et al.
Published: (2016-01-01) -
Correction to: ‘The natural selection of bad science’ (2016) by Paul E. Smaldino and Richard McElreath
by: Paul E. Smaldino, et al.
Published: (2023-09-01) -
Eleven years of student replication projects provide evidence on the correlates of replicability in psychology
by: Veronica Boyce, et al.
Published: (2023-11-01) -
Replication Study: A coding-independent function of gene and pseudogene mRNAs regulates tumour biology
by: John Kerwin, et al.
Published: (2020-04-01) -
No relationship between researcher impact and replication effect: an analysis of five studies with 100 replications
by: John Protzko, et al.
Published: (2020-03-01)