Driving learning development professionalism forward from within

Current conceptions view professions as negotiable, transient territories which are shaped by the discourses that describe them. The voices which influence how a profession evolves arise from both within and outside it. Theories on professionalism have been rigorously applied to teaching and academi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ian Paul Johnson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Association for Learning Development in Higher Education (ALDinHE) 2018-10-01
Series:Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education
Subjects:
Online Access:https://repl.gianfj.com/index.php/jldhe/article/view/470
_version_ 1818903967726305280
author Ian Paul Johnson
author_facet Ian Paul Johnson
author_sort Ian Paul Johnson
collection DOAJ
description Current conceptions view professions as negotiable, transient territories which are shaped by the discourses that describe them. The voices which influence how a profession evolves arise from both within and outside it. Theories on professionalism have been rigorously applied to teaching and academia. Learning Development exists within both spheres, yet its complex growth patterns have resulted in a fragmented and less theorised sense of professional identity. The rationales which create and fund Learning Development roles lean towards a model of fixing ‘deficits’ in students and their work; meanwhile, Learning Development’s professional association, ALDinHE, rejects those same deficit premises. In this article, using a theoretical framework and terminology from Evans (2008; 2011), I analyse the differences between those states of professionalism ‘demanded of’ and ‘enacted by’ Learning Developers. By coding various external and internal documents which frame job roles, I deduce how the two ‘professionalisms’ interact to resolve their inherent tensions; I identify a point of coalescence around Learning Development as a niche for mediation and demystification. I also explore how Learning Developers believe their profession can best evolve and sustain, via community-internal voices in literature and a survey of 14 ALDinHE members. Findings suggest that Learning Development remains a unique and valued activity, to which professional identity is attached. However, a precise sense among the ALDinHE community of what ‘equals’ a professional Learning Developer remains debated. More coherent is the community’s wish to see its values (Learning Development) permeate across the wider higher education landscape.
first_indexed 2024-12-19T20:59:58Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b232678d36d5448cbea36f3a9139d6c0
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1759-667X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T20:59:58Z
publishDate 2018-10-01
publisher Association for Learning Development in Higher Education (ALDinHE)
record_format Article
series Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education
spelling doaj.art-b232678d36d5448cbea36f3a9139d6c02022-12-21T20:05:51ZengAssociation for Learning Development in Higher Education (ALDinHE)Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education1759-667X2018-10-0110.47408/jldhe.v0i0.470Driving learning development professionalism forward from withinIan Paul Johnson0University of PortsmouthCurrent conceptions view professions as negotiable, transient territories which are shaped by the discourses that describe them. The voices which influence how a profession evolves arise from both within and outside it. Theories on professionalism have been rigorously applied to teaching and academia. Learning Development exists within both spheres, yet its complex growth patterns have resulted in a fragmented and less theorised sense of professional identity. The rationales which create and fund Learning Development roles lean towards a model of fixing ‘deficits’ in students and their work; meanwhile, Learning Development’s professional association, ALDinHE, rejects those same deficit premises. In this article, using a theoretical framework and terminology from Evans (2008; 2011), I analyse the differences between those states of professionalism ‘demanded of’ and ‘enacted by’ Learning Developers. By coding various external and internal documents which frame job roles, I deduce how the two ‘professionalisms’ interact to resolve their inherent tensions; I identify a point of coalescence around Learning Development as a niche for mediation and demystification. I also explore how Learning Developers believe their profession can best evolve and sustain, via community-internal voices in literature and a survey of 14 ALDinHE members. Findings suggest that Learning Development remains a unique and valued activity, to which professional identity is attached. However, a precise sense among the ALDinHE community of what ‘equals’ a professional Learning Developer remains debated. More coherent is the community’s wish to see its values (Learning Development) permeate across the wider higher education landscape.https://repl.gianfj.com/index.php/jldhe/article/view/470Learning developmentprofessionalismidentityperceptionsworking practicesacademic literacies
spellingShingle Ian Paul Johnson
Driving learning development professionalism forward from within
Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education
Learning development
professionalism
identity
perceptions
working practices
academic literacies
title Driving learning development professionalism forward from within
title_full Driving learning development professionalism forward from within
title_fullStr Driving learning development professionalism forward from within
title_full_unstemmed Driving learning development professionalism forward from within
title_short Driving learning development professionalism forward from within
title_sort driving learning development professionalism forward from within
topic Learning development
professionalism
identity
perceptions
working practices
academic literacies
url https://repl.gianfj.com/index.php/jldhe/article/view/470
work_keys_str_mv AT ianpauljohnson drivinglearningdevelopmentprofessionalismforwardfromwithin