Robust Inferences from a Before-and-After Study with Multiple Unaffected Control Groups

The before-and-after study with multiple unaffected control groups is widely applied to study treatment effects. The current methods usually assume that the control groups’ differences between the before and after periods, i.e. the group time effects, follow a normal distribution. However, there is...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wang Pengyuan, Traskin Mikhail, Small Dylan S.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: De Gruyter 2013-06-01
Series:Journal of Causal Inference
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1515/jci-2012-0010
_version_ 1830192129848115200
author Wang Pengyuan
Traskin Mikhail
Small Dylan S.
author_facet Wang Pengyuan
Traskin Mikhail
Small Dylan S.
author_sort Wang Pengyuan
collection DOAJ
description The before-and-after study with multiple unaffected control groups is widely applied to study treatment effects. The current methods usually assume that the control groups’ differences between the before and after periods, i.e. the group time effects, follow a normal distribution. However, there is usually no strong a priori evidence for the normality assumption, and there are not enough control groups to check the assumption. We propose to use a flexible skew-t distribution family to model group time effects, and consider a range of plausible skew-t distributions. Based on the skew-t distribution assumption, we propose a robust-t method to guarantee nominal significance level under a wide range of skew-t distributions, and hence make the inference robust to misspecification of the distribution of group time effects. We also propose a two-stage approach, which has lower power compared to the robust-t method, but provides an opportunity to conduct sensitivity analysis. Hence, the overall method of analysis is to use the robust-t method to test for the overall hypothesized range of shapes of group variation; if the test fails to reject, use the two-stage method to conduct a sensitivity analysis to see if there is a subset of group variation parameters for which we can be confident that there is a treatment effect. We apply the proposed methods to two datasets. One dataset is from the Current Population Survey (CPS) to study the impact of the Mariel Boatlift on Miami unemployment rates between 1979 and 1982.The other dataset contains the student enrollment and grade repeating data in West Germany in the 1960s with which we study the impact of the short school year in 1966–1967 on grade repeating rates.
first_indexed 2024-12-17T23:51:13Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b23d09bd9ed64917848e2aa3711898a4
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2193-3677
2193-3685
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-17T23:51:13Z
publishDate 2013-06-01
publisher De Gruyter
record_format Article
series Journal of Causal Inference
spelling doaj.art-b23d09bd9ed64917848e2aa3711898a42022-12-21T21:28:12ZengDe GruyterJournal of Causal Inference2193-36772193-36852013-06-011220923410.1515/jci-2012-0010Robust Inferences from a Before-and-After Study with Multiple Unaffected Control GroupsWang Pengyuan0Traskin Mikhail1Small Dylan S.2Yahoo! Lab, 701 1st Ave, Sunnyvale, CA 94085, USAAmazon.com, 207 Boren Ave. N., Seattle, WA 98109Department of Statistics, University of Pennsylvania, 3730 Walnut Street 400 Jon M. Huntsman Hall, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USAThe before-and-after study with multiple unaffected control groups is widely applied to study treatment effects. The current methods usually assume that the control groups’ differences between the before and after periods, i.e. the group time effects, follow a normal distribution. However, there is usually no strong a priori evidence for the normality assumption, and there are not enough control groups to check the assumption. We propose to use a flexible skew-t distribution family to model group time effects, and consider a range of plausible skew-t distributions. Based on the skew-t distribution assumption, we propose a robust-t method to guarantee nominal significance level under a wide range of skew-t distributions, and hence make the inference robust to misspecification of the distribution of group time effects. We also propose a two-stage approach, which has lower power compared to the robust-t method, but provides an opportunity to conduct sensitivity analysis. Hence, the overall method of analysis is to use the robust-t method to test for the overall hypothesized range of shapes of group variation; if the test fails to reject, use the two-stage method to conduct a sensitivity analysis to see if there is a subset of group variation parameters for which we can be confident that there is a treatment effect. We apply the proposed methods to two datasets. One dataset is from the Current Population Survey (CPS) to study the impact of the Mariel Boatlift on Miami unemployment rates between 1979 and 1982.The other dataset contains the student enrollment and grade repeating data in West Germany in the 1960s with which we study the impact of the short school year in 1966–1967 on grade repeating rates.https://doi.org/10.1515/jci-2012-0010before-and-after studydifference-in-differencerobust inferenceskew-t distributiongroup time effect
spellingShingle Wang Pengyuan
Traskin Mikhail
Small Dylan S.
Robust Inferences from a Before-and-After Study with Multiple Unaffected Control Groups
Journal of Causal Inference
before-and-after study
difference-in-difference
robust inference
skew-t distribution
group time effect
title Robust Inferences from a Before-and-After Study with Multiple Unaffected Control Groups
title_full Robust Inferences from a Before-and-After Study with Multiple Unaffected Control Groups
title_fullStr Robust Inferences from a Before-and-After Study with Multiple Unaffected Control Groups
title_full_unstemmed Robust Inferences from a Before-and-After Study with Multiple Unaffected Control Groups
title_short Robust Inferences from a Before-and-After Study with Multiple Unaffected Control Groups
title_sort robust inferences from a before and after study with multiple unaffected control groups
topic before-and-after study
difference-in-difference
robust inference
skew-t distribution
group time effect
url https://doi.org/10.1515/jci-2012-0010
work_keys_str_mv AT wangpengyuan robustinferencesfromabeforeandafterstudywithmultipleunaffectedcontrolgroups
AT traskinmikhail robustinferencesfromabeforeandafterstudywithmultipleunaffectedcontrolgroups
AT smalldylans robustinferencesfromabeforeandafterstudywithmultipleunaffectedcontrolgroups