P1-7: Modern Display Technology in Vision Science: Assessment of OLED and LCD Monitors for Visual Experiments

For many decades, cathode ray tube (CRT) monitors have been the dominant display technology in vision science. However, in recent years, most manufacturers stopped their CRT production lines, which enforces the application of alternative display technology in the field of vision science. Here, we an...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tobias Elze, Peter Bex
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2012-10-01
Series:i-Perception
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1068/if621
_version_ 1818519656846065664
author Tobias Elze
Peter Bex
author_facet Tobias Elze
Peter Bex
author_sort Tobias Elze
collection DOAJ
description For many decades, cathode ray tube (CRT) monitors have been the dominant display technology in vision science. However, in recent years, most manufacturers stopped their CRT production lines, which enforces the application of alternative display technology in the field of vision science. Here, we analyze liquid crystal displays (LCDs) and organic light-emitting diode (OLED) monitors for their applicability in vision science experiments. Based on extensive measurements of their photometric output, we compare these technologies and contrast them with classical CRT monitors. Vision scientists aim to accurately present both static and dynamic stimuli on their display devices. As for the presentation of static stimuli, we demonstrate an increased accuracy for LCD and OLED devices compared to CRT monitors, because the former exhibit a higher degree of independence of neighboring pixels. As for dynamic presentations, both CRTs and OLEDs outperform LCD devices in terms of accuracy, because dynamic presentations on LCDs require a reorientation of the liquid crystal molecules, so that successive frames in time depend on each other. Together with widely unknown and uncontrolled technical artifacts, these properties of LCDs may impair visual experiments that require high temporal precision. Therefore, OLED monitors are more suitable for vision science experiments with respect to both their static and their temporal characteristics. However, for certain applications in visual neuroscience, the low duty cycle of some OLED devices may introduce frequencies to the photometric output which fall within the window of visibility of neurons in the visual cortex and therefore interfere with single unit recordings.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T01:27:04Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b23d2cd41b984fd099c82f7721290773
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2041-6695
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T01:27:04Z
publishDate 2012-10-01
publisher SAGE Publishing
record_format Article
series i-Perception
spelling doaj.art-b23d2cd41b984fd099c82f77212907732022-12-22T01:25:29ZengSAGE Publishingi-Perception2041-66952012-10-01310.1068/if62110.1068_if621P1-7: Modern Display Technology in Vision Science: Assessment of OLED and LCD Monitors for Visual ExperimentsTobias Elze0Peter BexSERI, Harvard Medical School, USAFor many decades, cathode ray tube (CRT) monitors have been the dominant display technology in vision science. However, in recent years, most manufacturers stopped their CRT production lines, which enforces the application of alternative display technology in the field of vision science. Here, we analyze liquid crystal displays (LCDs) and organic light-emitting diode (OLED) monitors for their applicability in vision science experiments. Based on extensive measurements of their photometric output, we compare these technologies and contrast them with classical CRT monitors. Vision scientists aim to accurately present both static and dynamic stimuli on their display devices. As for the presentation of static stimuli, we demonstrate an increased accuracy for LCD and OLED devices compared to CRT monitors, because the former exhibit a higher degree of independence of neighboring pixels. As for dynamic presentations, both CRTs and OLEDs outperform LCD devices in terms of accuracy, because dynamic presentations on LCDs require a reorientation of the liquid crystal molecules, so that successive frames in time depend on each other. Together with widely unknown and uncontrolled technical artifacts, these properties of LCDs may impair visual experiments that require high temporal precision. Therefore, OLED monitors are more suitable for vision science experiments with respect to both their static and their temporal characteristics. However, for certain applications in visual neuroscience, the low duty cycle of some OLED devices may introduce frequencies to the photometric output which fall within the window of visibility of neurons in the visual cortex and therefore interfere with single unit recordings.https://doi.org/10.1068/if621
spellingShingle Tobias Elze
Peter Bex
P1-7: Modern Display Technology in Vision Science: Assessment of OLED and LCD Monitors for Visual Experiments
i-Perception
title P1-7: Modern Display Technology in Vision Science: Assessment of OLED and LCD Monitors for Visual Experiments
title_full P1-7: Modern Display Technology in Vision Science: Assessment of OLED and LCD Monitors for Visual Experiments
title_fullStr P1-7: Modern Display Technology in Vision Science: Assessment of OLED and LCD Monitors for Visual Experiments
title_full_unstemmed P1-7: Modern Display Technology in Vision Science: Assessment of OLED and LCD Monitors for Visual Experiments
title_short P1-7: Modern Display Technology in Vision Science: Assessment of OLED and LCD Monitors for Visual Experiments
title_sort p1 7 modern display technology in vision science assessment of oled and lcd monitors for visual experiments
url https://doi.org/10.1068/if621
work_keys_str_mv AT tobiaselze p17moderndisplaytechnologyinvisionscienceassessmentofoledandlcdmonitorsforvisualexperiments
AT peterbex p17moderndisplaytechnologyinvisionscienceassessmentofoledandlcdmonitorsforvisualexperiments