Protest Activity of Modern Youth in the Context of Institutionalization of Digital Policy
Introduction. The article is devoted to identifying and interpreting the reasons and forms of protest activity of representatives of the youth cohort in the context of the institutionalization of modern digital society and digital policy. The common and specific features of the protest activity of R...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Russian |
| Published: |
Volgograd State University
2022-02-01
|
| Series: | Вестник Волгоградского государственного университета. Серия 4. История, регионоведение, международные отношения |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://hfrir.jvolsu.com/index.php/en/component/attachments/download/2765 |
| _version_ | 1797694890993254400 |
|---|---|
| author | Sergey A. Pankratov Sergey I. Morozov Sergey D. Gavrilov |
| author_facet | Sergey A. Pankratov Sergey I. Morozov Sergey D. Gavrilov |
| author_sort | Sergey A. Pankratov |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Introduction. The article is devoted to identifying and interpreting the reasons and forms of protest activity of representatives of the youth cohort in the context of the institutionalization of modern digital society and digital policy. The common and specific features of the protest activity of Russian and foreign youth in the context of the content and level of their digital culture are characterized. The attention is focused on the dominant trends in the transformation of the practices of protest behavior in online and offline formats, taking into account the restrictive measures caused by the spread of COVID-19.
Methods. The work was prepared within the framework of political science discourse using modern scientific theories and concepts. The authors rely on the main provisions of the activity-activist approach (A. Giddens, V. Yadov), the concept of “traumatic changes” (P. Sztompka) and “network society” (M. Castells). At the same time, the characterization of digital transformations and innovations (society, politics, culture) is carried out in the context of the ideas of “digital counterculture” (C. Gere), domestic researchers analyzing the consumer behavior of youth in the digital environment (T. Beregovskaya, S. Grishaeva). The work uses theoretical and empirical methods for analyzing the results obtained by leading domestic and foreign research centers, as well as with the direct participation of the authors in the implementation of grant activities.
Results. An attempt is made to conduct political science analysis of the modern approaches to understanding the phenomenon of youth protest activity, its dominant forms in the context of the institutionalization of digital policy and the transformation of value orientations in the new structure of “digital culture”. The relationship between the protest activity of representatives of domestic and foreign youth, the practices of their destructive/constructive protest behavior using digital technologies in order to legitimize/ delegitimize the political regime is traced. Highlighted the real and potential resources of the authorities and administration, civil society institutions to minimize destructive factors that contribute to the strengthening of protest (civil, political, etc.) activity of various groups of young people in the context of the spread of the global pandemic. The results of theoretical and empirical studies that reveal the regional specifics of institutional forms of protest activity in modern Russia are interpreted.
Discussion. The question of the forms and technologies of transformation of protest activity, taking into account the substantive characteristics of the digital culture of youth, its inclusion in the system for ensuring the stable and safe development of the Russian Federation, remains poorly studied. Authors’ contributions. S.A. Pankratov developed the theoretical basis of the research and carried out the general scientific edition of the article. S.I. Morozov analyzed the dominant tendencies of youth protest activity. S.D. Gavrilov interpreted the results of theoretical and empirical studies characterizing the process of institutionalization of digital policy. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-12T03:04:24Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-b24888e470ed4e6aa54930235c3268cb |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1998-9938 2312-8704 |
| language | Russian |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-12T03:04:24Z |
| publishDate | 2022-02-01 |
| publisher | Volgograd State University |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Вестник Волгоградского государственного университета. Серия 4. История, регионоведение, международные отношения |
| spelling | doaj.art-b24888e470ed4e6aa54930235c3268cb2023-09-03T14:33:44ZrusVolgograd State UniversityВестник Волгоградского государственного университета. Серия 4. История, регионоведение, международные отношения1998-99382312-87042022-02-0127121322410.15688/jvolsu4.2022.1.18Protest Activity of Modern Youth in the Context of Institutionalization of Digital PolicySergey A. Pankratov0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1733-730XSergey I. Morozov1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4802-9203Sergey D. Gavrilov2Volgograd State UniversityVolgograd State UniversityVolgograd State UniversityIntroduction. The article is devoted to identifying and interpreting the reasons and forms of protest activity of representatives of the youth cohort in the context of the institutionalization of modern digital society and digital policy. The common and specific features of the protest activity of Russian and foreign youth in the context of the content and level of their digital culture are characterized. The attention is focused on the dominant trends in the transformation of the practices of protest behavior in online and offline formats, taking into account the restrictive measures caused by the spread of COVID-19. Methods. The work was prepared within the framework of political science discourse using modern scientific theories and concepts. The authors rely on the main provisions of the activity-activist approach (A. Giddens, V. Yadov), the concept of “traumatic changes” (P. Sztompka) and “network society” (M. Castells). At the same time, the characterization of digital transformations and innovations (society, politics, culture) is carried out in the context of the ideas of “digital counterculture” (C. Gere), domestic researchers analyzing the consumer behavior of youth in the digital environment (T. Beregovskaya, S. Grishaeva). The work uses theoretical and empirical methods for analyzing the results obtained by leading domestic and foreign research centers, as well as with the direct participation of the authors in the implementation of grant activities. Results. An attempt is made to conduct political science analysis of the modern approaches to understanding the phenomenon of youth protest activity, its dominant forms in the context of the institutionalization of digital policy and the transformation of value orientations in the new structure of “digital culture”. The relationship between the protest activity of representatives of domestic and foreign youth, the practices of their destructive/constructive protest behavior using digital technologies in order to legitimize/ delegitimize the political regime is traced. Highlighted the real and potential resources of the authorities and administration, civil society institutions to minimize destructive factors that contribute to the strengthening of protest (civil, political, etc.) activity of various groups of young people in the context of the spread of the global pandemic. The results of theoretical and empirical studies that reveal the regional specifics of institutional forms of protest activity in modern Russia are interpreted. Discussion. The question of the forms and technologies of transformation of protest activity, taking into account the substantive characteristics of the digital culture of youth, its inclusion in the system for ensuring the stable and safe development of the Russian Federation, remains poorly studied. Authors’ contributions. S.A. Pankratov developed the theoretical basis of the research and carried out the general scientific edition of the article. S.I. Morozov analyzed the dominant tendencies of youth protest activity. S.D. Gavrilov interpreted the results of theoretical and empirical studies characterizing the process of institutionalization of digital policy.https://hfrir.jvolsu.com/index.php/en/component/attachments/download/2765youthprotest activitydigital policydigital culturedestabilizationpolitical behaviorlegitimacy |
| spellingShingle | Sergey A. Pankratov Sergey I. Morozov Sergey D. Gavrilov Protest Activity of Modern Youth in the Context of Institutionalization of Digital Policy Вестник Волгоградского государственного университета. Серия 4. История, регионоведение, международные отношения youth protest activity digital policy digital culture destabilization political behavior legitimacy |
| title | Protest Activity of Modern Youth in the Context of Institutionalization of Digital Policy |
| title_full | Protest Activity of Modern Youth in the Context of Institutionalization of Digital Policy |
| title_fullStr | Protest Activity of Modern Youth in the Context of Institutionalization of Digital Policy |
| title_full_unstemmed | Protest Activity of Modern Youth in the Context of Institutionalization of Digital Policy |
| title_short | Protest Activity of Modern Youth in the Context of Institutionalization of Digital Policy |
| title_sort | protest activity of modern youth in the context of institutionalization of digital policy |
| topic | youth protest activity digital policy digital culture destabilization political behavior legitimacy |
| url | https://hfrir.jvolsu.com/index.php/en/component/attachments/download/2765 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT sergeyapankratov protestactivityofmodernyouthinthecontextofinstitutionalizationofdigitalpolicy AT sergeyimorozov protestactivityofmodernyouthinthecontextofinstitutionalizationofdigitalpolicy AT sergeydgavrilov protestactivityofmodernyouthinthecontextofinstitutionalizationofdigitalpolicy |