The predictive value of Hounsfield units for titanium mesh cage subsidence after anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion

ObjectiveTo investigate whether bone mineral density (BMD) measured in Hounsfield units (HUs) correlates with titanium mesh cage (TMC) subsidence after anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF).MethodsA total of 64 patients who underwent one or two levels of ACCF with TMC with a mean follow-up...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Haimiti Abudouaini, Tingkui Wu, Hao Liu, Beiyu Wang, Hua Chen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-01-01
Series:Frontiers in Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2022.1012364/full
_version_ 1828070686565859328
author Haimiti Abudouaini
Tingkui Wu
Hao Liu
Beiyu Wang
Hua Chen
author_facet Haimiti Abudouaini
Tingkui Wu
Hao Liu
Beiyu Wang
Hua Chen
author_sort Haimiti Abudouaini
collection DOAJ
description ObjectiveTo investigate whether bone mineral density (BMD) measured in Hounsfield units (HUs) correlates with titanium mesh cage (TMC) subsidence after anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF).MethodsA total of 64 patients who underwent one or two levels of ACCF with TMC with a mean follow-up of 19.34 ± 7.86 months were analysed. HU values were measured three times in 3 different planes in the upper and lower vertebrae according to published methods. Subsidence was defined as segmental height loss of more than 3 mm. Pearson correlation analysis was performed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to obtain optimal thresholds. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was also conducted.ResultsTwenty-two patients (34.38%) had evidence of TMC subsidence on follow-up x-ray. The mean HU values in the subsidence group (317.34 ± 32.32, n = 22) were significantly lower than those in the nonsubsidence group (363.07 ± 25.23 n = 42, p < 0.001, t test). At last follow-up, mean disc height loss was 4.80 ± 1.16 mm in the subsidence group and 1.85 ± 1.14 mm in the nonsubsidence group (p < 0.001). There was a negative correlation between HU values and disc height loss (Pearson's coefficient −0.494, p < 0.001). HU values decreased gradually from the C3 vertebra to the C7 vertebra, and the HU values of the C5, C6, and C7 vertebrae in the nonsubsidence group were significantly higher than those in the subsidence group (p < 0.05). Furthermore, there were significant differences between the groups in the segmental angle at the last follow-up and the mean changes in segmental angle (p < 0.05). The area under the ROC curve was 0.859, and the most appropriate threshold of the HU value was 330.5 (sensitivity 100%, specificity 72.7%). The multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that older age (p = 0.033, OR = 0.879), lower LIV HU value (p < 0.001, OR = 1.053) and a greater segmental angle change (p = 0.002, OR 6.442) were significantly associated with a higher incidence of TMC subsidence after ACCF.ConclusionThere are strong correlations between a lower HU value and TMC subsidence after ACCF. More accurate assessment of bone quality may be obtained if HU measurement can be used as a routine preoperative screening method together with DXA. For patients with HU values <330.5, a more comprehensive and cautious preoperative plan should be implemented to reduce TMC subsidence.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T00:40:39Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b249a8cb0832488ca2ca90ac222057c2
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2296-875X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T00:40:39Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Surgery
spelling doaj.art-b249a8cb0832488ca2ca90ac222057c22023-01-06T06:13:38ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Surgery2296-875X2023-01-01910.3389/fsurg.2022.10123641012364The predictive value of Hounsfield units for titanium mesh cage subsidence after anterior cervical corpectomy and fusionHaimiti AbudouainiTingkui WuHao LiuBeiyu WangHua ChenObjectiveTo investigate whether bone mineral density (BMD) measured in Hounsfield units (HUs) correlates with titanium mesh cage (TMC) subsidence after anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF).MethodsA total of 64 patients who underwent one or two levels of ACCF with TMC with a mean follow-up of 19.34 ± 7.86 months were analysed. HU values were measured three times in 3 different planes in the upper and lower vertebrae according to published methods. Subsidence was defined as segmental height loss of more than 3 mm. Pearson correlation analysis was performed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to obtain optimal thresholds. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was also conducted.ResultsTwenty-two patients (34.38%) had evidence of TMC subsidence on follow-up x-ray. The mean HU values in the subsidence group (317.34 ± 32.32, n = 22) were significantly lower than those in the nonsubsidence group (363.07 ± 25.23 n = 42, p < 0.001, t test). At last follow-up, mean disc height loss was 4.80 ± 1.16 mm in the subsidence group and 1.85 ± 1.14 mm in the nonsubsidence group (p < 0.001). There was a negative correlation between HU values and disc height loss (Pearson's coefficient −0.494, p < 0.001). HU values decreased gradually from the C3 vertebra to the C7 vertebra, and the HU values of the C5, C6, and C7 vertebrae in the nonsubsidence group were significantly higher than those in the subsidence group (p < 0.05). Furthermore, there were significant differences between the groups in the segmental angle at the last follow-up and the mean changes in segmental angle (p < 0.05). The area under the ROC curve was 0.859, and the most appropriate threshold of the HU value was 330.5 (sensitivity 100%, specificity 72.7%). The multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that older age (p = 0.033, OR = 0.879), lower LIV HU value (p < 0.001, OR = 1.053) and a greater segmental angle change (p = 0.002, OR 6.442) were significantly associated with a higher incidence of TMC subsidence after ACCF.ConclusionThere are strong correlations between a lower HU value and TMC subsidence after ACCF. More accurate assessment of bone quality may be obtained if HU measurement can be used as a routine preoperative screening method together with DXA. For patients with HU values <330.5, a more comprehensive and cautious preoperative plan should be implemented to reduce TMC subsidence.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2022.1012364/fullanterior cervical corpectomy and fusionACCFHounsfield unitssubsidencebone mineral density
spellingShingle Haimiti Abudouaini
Tingkui Wu
Hao Liu
Beiyu Wang
Hua Chen
The predictive value of Hounsfield units for titanium mesh cage subsidence after anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion
Frontiers in Surgery
anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion
ACCF
Hounsfield units
subsidence
bone mineral density
title The predictive value of Hounsfield units for titanium mesh cage subsidence after anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion
title_full The predictive value of Hounsfield units for titanium mesh cage subsidence after anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion
title_fullStr The predictive value of Hounsfield units for titanium mesh cage subsidence after anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion
title_full_unstemmed The predictive value of Hounsfield units for titanium mesh cage subsidence after anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion
title_short The predictive value of Hounsfield units for titanium mesh cage subsidence after anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion
title_sort predictive value of hounsfield units for titanium mesh cage subsidence after anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion
topic anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion
ACCF
Hounsfield units
subsidence
bone mineral density
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2022.1012364/full
work_keys_str_mv AT haimitiabudouaini thepredictivevalueofhounsfieldunitsfortitaniummeshcagesubsidenceafteranteriorcervicalcorpectomyandfusion
AT tingkuiwu thepredictivevalueofhounsfieldunitsfortitaniummeshcagesubsidenceafteranteriorcervicalcorpectomyandfusion
AT haoliu thepredictivevalueofhounsfieldunitsfortitaniummeshcagesubsidenceafteranteriorcervicalcorpectomyandfusion
AT beiyuwang thepredictivevalueofhounsfieldunitsfortitaniummeshcagesubsidenceafteranteriorcervicalcorpectomyandfusion
AT huachen thepredictivevalueofhounsfieldunitsfortitaniummeshcagesubsidenceafteranteriorcervicalcorpectomyandfusion
AT haimitiabudouaini predictivevalueofhounsfieldunitsfortitaniummeshcagesubsidenceafteranteriorcervicalcorpectomyandfusion
AT tingkuiwu predictivevalueofhounsfieldunitsfortitaniummeshcagesubsidenceafteranteriorcervicalcorpectomyandfusion
AT haoliu predictivevalueofhounsfieldunitsfortitaniummeshcagesubsidenceafteranteriorcervicalcorpectomyandfusion
AT beiyuwang predictivevalueofhounsfieldunitsfortitaniummeshcagesubsidenceafteranteriorcervicalcorpectomyandfusion
AT huachen predictivevalueofhounsfieldunitsfortitaniummeshcagesubsidenceafteranteriorcervicalcorpectomyandfusion