Intercomparison of simulations using 5 WRF microphysical schemes with dual-Polarization data for a German squall line

Simulations of a squall line system which occurred on 12 August 2004 near Munich, Germany are performed using a fine grid version of the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model with five different microphysical schemes. Synthetic dual polarization observations are created from the model output...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: W. A. Gallus Jr., M. Pfeifer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2008-04-01
Series:Advances in Geosciences
Online Access:http://www.adv-geosci.net/16/109/2008/adgeo-16-109-2008.pdf
_version_ 1818662985236742144
author W. A. Gallus Jr.
M. Pfeifer
author_facet W. A. Gallus Jr.
M. Pfeifer
author_sort W. A. Gallus Jr.
collection DOAJ
description Simulations of a squall line system which occurred on 12 August 2004 near Munich, Germany are performed using a fine grid version of the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model with five different microphysical schemes. Synthetic dual polarization observations are created from the model output and compared with detailed observations gathered by the DLR polarimetric radar POLDIRAD located near Munich. Synthetic polarimetric radar scans are derived from the model forecasts employing the polarimetric radar forward operator SynPolRad. Evaluations of the microphysical parameterization schemes are carried out comparing Plan Position Indicator (PPI) and Range Height Indicator (RHI) scans of reflectivity and the spatial distribution of hydrometeor types. The hydrometeor types are derived applying a hydrometeor classification scheme to the observed and simulated polarimetric radar quantities. Furthermore, the Ebert-McBride contiguous rain area method of verification is tested in a variety of ways on the reflectivity output from the simulations. It is found that all five schemes overestimate reflectivity in the domain, particularly in the stratiform region of the convective system. All four schemes including graupel as a hydrometeor type produce too much of it. Differences are seen among the schemes in their depiction of reflectivity in the convective line and their representation of radar bright bands.
first_indexed 2024-12-17T05:09:39Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b24cd92a8bc642ad81a376bf0eb5b655
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1680-7340
1680-7359
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-17T05:09:39Z
publishDate 2008-04-01
publisher Copernicus Publications
record_format Article
series Advances in Geosciences
spelling doaj.art-b24cd92a8bc642ad81a376bf0eb5b6552022-12-21T22:02:18ZengCopernicus PublicationsAdvances in Geosciences1680-73401680-73592008-04-0116109116Intercomparison of simulations using 5 WRF microphysical schemes with dual-Polarization data for a German squall lineW. A. Gallus Jr.M. PfeiferSimulations of a squall line system which occurred on 12 August 2004 near Munich, Germany are performed using a fine grid version of the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model with five different microphysical schemes. Synthetic dual polarization observations are created from the model output and compared with detailed observations gathered by the DLR polarimetric radar POLDIRAD located near Munich. Synthetic polarimetric radar scans are derived from the model forecasts employing the polarimetric radar forward operator SynPolRad. Evaluations of the microphysical parameterization schemes are carried out comparing Plan Position Indicator (PPI) and Range Height Indicator (RHI) scans of reflectivity and the spatial distribution of hydrometeor types. The hydrometeor types are derived applying a hydrometeor classification scheme to the observed and simulated polarimetric radar quantities. Furthermore, the Ebert-McBride contiguous rain area method of verification is tested in a variety of ways on the reflectivity output from the simulations. It is found that all five schemes overestimate reflectivity in the domain, particularly in the stratiform region of the convective system. All four schemes including graupel as a hydrometeor type produce too much of it. Differences are seen among the schemes in their depiction of reflectivity in the convective line and their representation of radar bright bands.http://www.adv-geosci.net/16/109/2008/adgeo-16-109-2008.pdf
spellingShingle W. A. Gallus Jr.
M. Pfeifer
Intercomparison of simulations using 5 WRF microphysical schemes with dual-Polarization data for a German squall line
Advances in Geosciences
title Intercomparison of simulations using 5 WRF microphysical schemes with dual-Polarization data for a German squall line
title_full Intercomparison of simulations using 5 WRF microphysical schemes with dual-Polarization data for a German squall line
title_fullStr Intercomparison of simulations using 5 WRF microphysical schemes with dual-Polarization data for a German squall line
title_full_unstemmed Intercomparison of simulations using 5 WRF microphysical schemes with dual-Polarization data for a German squall line
title_short Intercomparison of simulations using 5 WRF microphysical schemes with dual-Polarization data for a German squall line
title_sort intercomparison of simulations using 5 wrf microphysical schemes with dual polarization data for a german squall line
url http://www.adv-geosci.net/16/109/2008/adgeo-16-109-2008.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT wagallusjr intercomparisonofsimulationsusing5wrfmicrophysicalschemeswithdualpolarizationdataforagermansquallline
AT mpfeifer intercomparisonofsimulationsusing5wrfmicrophysicalschemeswithdualpolarizationdataforagermansquallline