Completeness and consistency of primary outcome reporting in COVID-19 publications in the early pandemic phase: a descriptive study
Abstract Background The COVID-19 pandemic saw a steep increase in the number of rapidly published scientific studies, especially early in the pandemic. Some have suggested COVID-19 trial reporting is of lower quality than typical reports, but there is limited evidence for this in terms of primary ou...
Main Authors: | Marlene Stoll, Saskia Lindner, Bernd Marquardt, Maia Salholz-Hillel, Nicholas J. DeVito, David Klemperer, Klaus Lieb |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2023-07-01
|
Series: | BMC Medical Research Methodology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-023-01991-9 |
Similar Items
-
Completeness and consistency of primary outcome reporting in COVID-19 publications in the early pandemic phase: a descriptive study
by: Stoll, M, et al.
Published: (2023) -
A Validation of the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Register – With Focus on Histopathology, Complications and Recurrences
by: Arnarson Ö, et al.
Published: (2024-08-01) -
In India, most principal investigators have run very few trials over the years
by: Rishima Borah, et al.
Published: (2024-08-01) -
Dissemination of Registered COVID-19 Clinical Trials (DIRECCT): a cross-sectional study
by: Maia Salholz-Hillel, et al.
Published: (2023-11-01) -
Data quality and patient coverage at Sina Hospital Trauma Registry affiliated with the National Trauma Registry of Iran
by: Vali Baigi, et al.
Published: (2023-11-01)