| Summary: | Purpose: To assess the feasibility of the 6-point Dixon method for evaluating liver masses. We also report our initial experience with the quantitative values in various liver masses on a 3T system. Materials and methods: Of 251 consecutive patients for whom 6-point Dixon was employed in abdominal magnetic resonance imaging scans between October 2020 and October 2021, 117 nodules in 117 patients with a mass diameter of more than 1 cm were included in the study. Images for measuring the proton density fat fraction (PDFF) and R2 * values were obtained using the iterative decomposition of water and fat with echo asymmetry and least-squares estimation-quantitative technique for liver imaging. Two radiologists independently measured PDFF (%) and R2 * (Hz). Inter-reader agreement and the differences between readers were examined using intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) and the Bland-Altman method, respectively. PDFF and R2 * values in differentiating liver masses were examined. Results: The masses included hepatocellular carcinoma (n = 59), cyst (n = 20), metastasis (n = 14), hemangioma (n = 8), and others (n = 16). The ICCs for the region of interest (mm2), PDFF, and R2 * were 0.988 (95 % confidence interval (CI): 0.983, 0.992), 0.964 (95 % CI: 0.949, 0.975), and 0.962 (95 % CI: 0.941, 0.975), respectively. The differences of measurements between the readers showed that 5.1 % (6/117) and 6.0% (7/117) for PDFF and R2 * , respectively, were outside the 95 % CI. Conclusion: Our observation indicates that the 6-point Dixon method is applicable to liver masses.
|
|---|