Methodological Basis of the Comparative Evaluation of Inclusiveness Level of Economic Development

The article is devoted to the methodological basis of comparative assessment of the level of inclusion of economic development in different areas and regions. The article focuses on the methodological problems of analyzing, evaluating, and raising the level of inclusiveness of economic development....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Aliyev Alovsat Garaja
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sciendo 2021-12-01
Series:Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.2478/mdke-2021-0027
_version_ 1818307519596986368
author Aliyev Alovsat Garaja
author_facet Aliyev Alovsat Garaja
author_sort Aliyev Alovsat Garaja
collection DOAJ
description The article is devoted to the methodological basis of comparative assessment of the level of inclusion of economic development in different areas and regions. The article focuses on the methodological problems of analyzing, evaluating, and raising the level of inclusiveness of economic development. The importance of raising the level of inclusion in the context of new development trends in society and the economy is interpreted. The need for a new look at the scientific and theoretical basics of economic development are emphasized. Available studies on inclusive development issues are analyzed. Indicators and sub-indices characterizing the inclusive development of the society are proposed. An analysis of international scientific research on the problems of inclusive development was conducted. As the increase in the inclusion of the economy leads to an increase in the Gross Domestic Product (GDP), the urgency of developing its prospects is justified. Ratings of advanced countries on inclusive economic development indices were analyzed. Indicators of inclusive development of international economic organizations have been identified and based on them, relevant improvements have been made and additions have been made. Indicators and sub-indices characterizing the inclusive development of society are offered. The evaluation of inclusive development at the international level is analyzed. The methodological basis of the evaluation of the inclusiveness level is explained and a technique is developed. Key efficiency indicators for inclusive growth and development have been identified. The country's National Inclusive Development Index (NII) is proposed as a dependency on sub-indices that reflect several areas. Subindices and indicators forming the level of inclusion of national economic development have been proposed. The scientific-methodological approach proposed for the assessment of inclusion at the national level is presented in the form of algorithms and conceptual stages. Assessment of the level of national inclusion is offered as Level I - inclusion at the national, social, or macro-level; Level II - inclusion of regional or individual cities and regions; Level III - intersectoral or sectorial inclusion; Level IV - inclusion in the private sector, non-governmental structures; Level V - inclusion in non-governmental and public administration; Level VI - inclusion in the micro or enterprises, production level; Level VII - in several sub-levels as individual inclusion in homes and families. National and international evaluation of the inclusive society and economic development is studied. The main factors of inclusive development of Azerbaijan's economy such as GDP per capita, labor productivity, expected healthy life length, employment level, Gini index of income, poverty level, Gini index of wealth, monthly household income, net savings, carbon capacity, public debt to GDP indicators such as ratio, demographic load ratio have been developed. The importance of the use of inclusion technologies was highlighted and reported on. It was noted that the effective platform for increasing the inclusion of the information society has many opportunities. It was noted that the globally implemented “Internet of Things” (IoT), Cloud computing, soft-computing, Big Data technologies, and components of the 4.0 Industrial Revolution will create additional opportunities for joint effective activities of citizens in society, increasing the level of inclusion.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T06:59:40Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b2665923ab274f088e34bac53bd5dbc2
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2392-8042
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T06:59:40Z
publishDate 2021-12-01
publisher Sciendo
record_format Article
series Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy
spelling doaj.art-b2665923ab274f088e34bac53bd5dbc22022-12-21T23:55:58ZengSciendoManagement Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy2392-80422021-12-019440441810.2478/mdke-2021-0027Methodological Basis of the Comparative Evaluation of Inclusiveness Level of Economic DevelopmentAliyev Alovsat Garaja0Institute of Information Technology of Azerbaijan National Academy of Sciences, B.Vahabzade St., 9A, Baku, 1141, AZThe article is devoted to the methodological basis of comparative assessment of the level of inclusion of economic development in different areas and regions. The article focuses on the methodological problems of analyzing, evaluating, and raising the level of inclusiveness of economic development. The importance of raising the level of inclusion in the context of new development trends in society and the economy is interpreted. The need for a new look at the scientific and theoretical basics of economic development are emphasized. Available studies on inclusive development issues are analyzed. Indicators and sub-indices characterizing the inclusive development of the society are proposed. An analysis of international scientific research on the problems of inclusive development was conducted. As the increase in the inclusion of the economy leads to an increase in the Gross Domestic Product (GDP), the urgency of developing its prospects is justified. Ratings of advanced countries on inclusive economic development indices were analyzed. Indicators of inclusive development of international economic organizations have been identified and based on them, relevant improvements have been made and additions have been made. Indicators and sub-indices characterizing the inclusive development of society are offered. The evaluation of inclusive development at the international level is analyzed. The methodological basis of the evaluation of the inclusiveness level is explained and a technique is developed. Key efficiency indicators for inclusive growth and development have been identified. The country's National Inclusive Development Index (NII) is proposed as a dependency on sub-indices that reflect several areas. Subindices and indicators forming the level of inclusion of national economic development have been proposed. The scientific-methodological approach proposed for the assessment of inclusion at the national level is presented in the form of algorithms and conceptual stages. Assessment of the level of national inclusion is offered as Level I - inclusion at the national, social, or macro-level; Level II - inclusion of regional or individual cities and regions; Level III - intersectoral or sectorial inclusion; Level IV - inclusion in the private sector, non-governmental structures; Level V - inclusion in non-governmental and public administration; Level VI - inclusion in the micro or enterprises, production level; Level VII - in several sub-levels as individual inclusion in homes and families. National and international evaluation of the inclusive society and economic development is studied. The main factors of inclusive development of Azerbaijan's economy such as GDP per capita, labor productivity, expected healthy life length, employment level, Gini index of income, poverty level, Gini index of wealth, monthly household income, net savings, carbon capacity, public debt to GDP indicators such as ratio, demographic load ratio have been developed. The importance of the use of inclusion technologies was highlighted and reported on. It was noted that the effective platform for increasing the inclusion of the information society has many opportunities. It was noted that the globally implemented “Internet of Things” (IoT), Cloud computing, soft-computing, Big Data technologies, and components of the 4.0 Industrial Revolution will create additional opportunities for joint effective activities of citizens in society, increasing the level of inclusion.https://doi.org/10.2478/mdke-2021-0027economic growthinclusiveness of economic developmentnational inclusive development indexinclusiveness level and index4.0 industrial revolutioninternet of things (iot)inclusiveness indicatorsinclusiveness evaluationinclusiveness problems
spellingShingle Aliyev Alovsat Garaja
Methodological Basis of the Comparative Evaluation of Inclusiveness Level of Economic Development
Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy
economic growth
inclusiveness of economic development
national inclusive development index
inclusiveness level and index
4.0 industrial revolution
internet of things (iot)
inclusiveness indicators
inclusiveness evaluation
inclusiveness problems
title Methodological Basis of the Comparative Evaluation of Inclusiveness Level of Economic Development
title_full Methodological Basis of the Comparative Evaluation of Inclusiveness Level of Economic Development
title_fullStr Methodological Basis of the Comparative Evaluation of Inclusiveness Level of Economic Development
title_full_unstemmed Methodological Basis of the Comparative Evaluation of Inclusiveness Level of Economic Development
title_short Methodological Basis of the Comparative Evaluation of Inclusiveness Level of Economic Development
title_sort methodological basis of the comparative evaluation of inclusiveness level of economic development
topic economic growth
inclusiveness of economic development
national inclusive development index
inclusiveness level and index
4.0 industrial revolution
internet of things (iot)
inclusiveness indicators
inclusiveness evaluation
inclusiveness problems
url https://doi.org/10.2478/mdke-2021-0027
work_keys_str_mv AT aliyevalovsatgaraja methodologicalbasisofthecomparativeevaluationofinclusivenesslevelofeconomicdevelopment