Long-Term Violent Reoffending Following Forensic Psychiatric Treatment: Comparing Forensic Psychiatric Examinees and General Offender Controls

Background: Long-term violent re-offending in forensic psychiatric (FP) patients vs. non-FP offenders is largely unknown.Methods: We studied rates and facets of long-term violent reoffending among 1,062 violent forensic psychiatric examinees (FPE) consecutively undergoing pre-trial, forensic psychia...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Susanne Bengtson, Jens Lund, Michael Ibsen, Niklas Långström
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-10-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychiatry
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00715/full
_version_ 1811234185034072064
author Susanne Bengtson
Susanne Bengtson
Jens Lund
Michael Ibsen
Niklas Långström
Niklas Långström
author_facet Susanne Bengtson
Susanne Bengtson
Jens Lund
Michael Ibsen
Niklas Långström
Niklas Långström
author_sort Susanne Bengtson
collection DOAJ
description Background: Long-term violent re-offending in forensic psychiatric (FP) patients vs. non-FP offenders is largely unknown.Methods: We studied rates and facets of long-term violent reoffending among 1,062 violent forensic psychiatric examinees (FPE) consecutively undergoing pre-trial, forensic psychiatric examination (FPE) in Denmark during 1980–1992. Altogether, 392 were sentenced to FP treatment (FPE+T); the remaining 670 examinees received ordinary non-FP sanctions (FPE-T). FPE+T were compared to 392 contemporary matched violent general offenders (GEN) without FPE or other psychiatric contacts and sentenced to ordinary non-FP sanctions. FPE data were linked to population-based registers with sociodemographic, psychiatric, and crime information, and we estimated relative risks controlling for birth year, sex, educational and marital status, and previous violent crime.Results: During follow-up (mean = 18.0–19.5 years), FPE+T and GEN had any violent recidivism rates of 43% vs. 29% [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) = 1.5; 95% CI, 1.1–1.9], respectively. Corresponding findings for severe violence (21% vs. 14%; aHR = 1.3; 95% CI, 0.9–1.9) and recurrent violence (3+ violent convictions; 16% vs. 6%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 2.5; 95% CI, 1.5–4.4) also suggested weakly to moderately increased risks in FPE+T, albeit non-significantly for the former. Comparing FPE+T to FPE-T suggested decreased risk of any violence (43% vs. 51%; aHR = 0.8; 95% CI, 0.6–1.1), severe (21% vs. 34%; aHR = 0.6; 95% CI, 0.4–0.8), and recurrent violence [16% vs. 22%; adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 0.7; 95% CI, 0.5–1.0] in FP patients, though non-significantly for any violence and recurrent violence. Among all FPE examinees, violent reoffending was independently predicted by male sex, younger age, pre-index violent crime, personality disorder (vs. schizophrenia spectrum and other psychiatric disorder), substance use disorder, and 5+ hospital admissions.Conclusion: FPE examinees, untreated followed by treated, reoffend violently more often than GENs. Similar trends are suggested also for severe and recurrent violence suggesting a need for continua of services for FPE examinees, independently of medico-legal status (i.e., sentencing to treatment or not).
first_indexed 2024-04-12T11:33:33Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b27267693a814ef2ad449134152fcdf9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-0640
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T11:33:33Z
publishDate 2019-10-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Psychiatry
spelling doaj.art-b27267693a814ef2ad449134152fcdf92022-12-22T03:34:57ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychiatry1664-06402019-10-011010.3389/fpsyt.2019.00715477684Long-Term Violent Reoffending Following Forensic Psychiatric Treatment: Comparing Forensic Psychiatric Examinees and General Offender ControlsSusanne Bengtson0Susanne Bengtson1Jens Lund2Michael Ibsen3Niklas Långström4Niklas Långström5Department of Forensic Psychiatry, Aarhus University Hospital Psychiatry, Aarhus, DenmarkSexological Clinic, Psychiatric Centre Copenhagen, Copenhagen, DenmarkDepartment of Forensic Psychiatry, Aarhus University Hospital Psychiatry, Aarhus, DenmarkI2 Minds, Aarhus, DenmarkDepartment of Forensic Psychiatry, Aarhus University Hospital Psychiatry, Aarhus, DenmarkDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, SwedenBackground: Long-term violent re-offending in forensic psychiatric (FP) patients vs. non-FP offenders is largely unknown.Methods: We studied rates and facets of long-term violent reoffending among 1,062 violent forensic psychiatric examinees (FPE) consecutively undergoing pre-trial, forensic psychiatric examination (FPE) in Denmark during 1980–1992. Altogether, 392 were sentenced to FP treatment (FPE+T); the remaining 670 examinees received ordinary non-FP sanctions (FPE-T). FPE+T were compared to 392 contemporary matched violent general offenders (GEN) without FPE or other psychiatric contacts and sentenced to ordinary non-FP sanctions. FPE data were linked to population-based registers with sociodemographic, psychiatric, and crime information, and we estimated relative risks controlling for birth year, sex, educational and marital status, and previous violent crime.Results: During follow-up (mean = 18.0–19.5 years), FPE+T and GEN had any violent recidivism rates of 43% vs. 29% [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) = 1.5; 95% CI, 1.1–1.9], respectively. Corresponding findings for severe violence (21% vs. 14%; aHR = 1.3; 95% CI, 0.9–1.9) and recurrent violence (3+ violent convictions; 16% vs. 6%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 2.5; 95% CI, 1.5–4.4) also suggested weakly to moderately increased risks in FPE+T, albeit non-significantly for the former. Comparing FPE+T to FPE-T suggested decreased risk of any violence (43% vs. 51%; aHR = 0.8; 95% CI, 0.6–1.1), severe (21% vs. 34%; aHR = 0.6; 95% CI, 0.4–0.8), and recurrent violence [16% vs. 22%; adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 0.7; 95% CI, 0.5–1.0] in FP patients, though non-significantly for any violence and recurrent violence. Among all FPE examinees, violent reoffending was independently predicted by male sex, younger age, pre-index violent crime, personality disorder (vs. schizophrenia spectrum and other psychiatric disorder), substance use disorder, and 5+ hospital admissions.Conclusion: FPE examinees, untreated followed by treated, reoffend violently more often than GENs. Similar trends are suggested also for severe and recurrent violence suggesting a need for continua of services for FPE examinees, independently of medico-legal status (i.e., sentencing to treatment or not).https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00715/fullforensic psychiatric patientsviolent reoffending riskfacets of violencelong-term follow-upforensic psychiatric evaluation
spellingShingle Susanne Bengtson
Susanne Bengtson
Jens Lund
Michael Ibsen
Niklas Långström
Niklas Långström
Long-Term Violent Reoffending Following Forensic Psychiatric Treatment: Comparing Forensic Psychiatric Examinees and General Offender Controls
Frontiers in Psychiatry
forensic psychiatric patients
violent reoffending risk
facets of violence
long-term follow-up
forensic psychiatric evaluation
title Long-Term Violent Reoffending Following Forensic Psychiatric Treatment: Comparing Forensic Psychiatric Examinees and General Offender Controls
title_full Long-Term Violent Reoffending Following Forensic Psychiatric Treatment: Comparing Forensic Psychiatric Examinees and General Offender Controls
title_fullStr Long-Term Violent Reoffending Following Forensic Psychiatric Treatment: Comparing Forensic Psychiatric Examinees and General Offender Controls
title_full_unstemmed Long-Term Violent Reoffending Following Forensic Psychiatric Treatment: Comparing Forensic Psychiatric Examinees and General Offender Controls
title_short Long-Term Violent Reoffending Following Forensic Psychiatric Treatment: Comparing Forensic Psychiatric Examinees and General Offender Controls
title_sort long term violent reoffending following forensic psychiatric treatment comparing forensic psychiatric examinees and general offender controls
topic forensic psychiatric patients
violent reoffending risk
facets of violence
long-term follow-up
forensic psychiatric evaluation
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00715/full
work_keys_str_mv AT susannebengtson longtermviolentreoffendingfollowingforensicpsychiatrictreatmentcomparingforensicpsychiatricexamineesandgeneraloffendercontrols
AT susannebengtson longtermviolentreoffendingfollowingforensicpsychiatrictreatmentcomparingforensicpsychiatricexamineesandgeneraloffendercontrols
AT jenslund longtermviolentreoffendingfollowingforensicpsychiatrictreatmentcomparingforensicpsychiatricexamineesandgeneraloffendercontrols
AT michaelibsen longtermviolentreoffendingfollowingforensicpsychiatrictreatmentcomparingforensicpsychiatricexamineesandgeneraloffendercontrols
AT niklaslangstrom longtermviolentreoffendingfollowingforensicpsychiatrictreatmentcomparingforensicpsychiatricexamineesandgeneraloffendercontrols
AT niklaslangstrom longtermviolentreoffendingfollowingforensicpsychiatrictreatmentcomparingforensicpsychiatricexamineesandgeneraloffendercontrols