Classification of Smoking Cessation Apps: Quality Review and Content Analysis
BackgroundMany people use apps for smoking cessation, and the effectiveness of these apps has been proven in several studies. However, no study has classified these apps and only few studies have analyzed the characteristics of these apps that influence their quality....
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
JMIR Publications
2022-02-01
|
| Series: | JMIR mHealth and uHealth |
| Online Access: | https://mhealth.jmir.org/2022/2/e17268 |
| _version_ | 1797735353864421376 |
|---|---|
| author | Suin Seo Sung-Il Cho Wonjeong Yoon Cheol Min Lee |
| author_facet | Suin Seo Sung-Il Cho Wonjeong Yoon Cheol Min Lee |
| author_sort | Suin Seo |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description |
BackgroundMany people use apps for smoking cessation, and the effectiveness of these apps has been proven in several studies. However, no study has classified these apps and only few studies have analyzed the characteristics of these apps that influence their quality.
ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to analyze the content and the quality of smoking cessation apps by type and identify the characteristics that affect their overall quality.
MethodsTwo app marketplaces (App Store and Google Play) were searched in January 2018, and the search was completed by May 2020. The search terms used were “stop smoking,” “quit smoking,” and “smoking cessation.” The apps were categorized into 3 types (combined, multifunctional, and informational). The tailored guideline of Clinical Practice Guideline for Treating Tobacco Use and Dependence was utilized for evaluating app content (or functions), and the Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS) was used to evaluate the quality. Chi-square test was performed for the general characteristics, and one-way analysis of variance was performed for MARS analysis. To identify the general features of the apps that could be associated with the MARS and content scores, multiple regression analysis was done. All analyses were performed using SAS software (ver. 9.3).
ResultsAmong 1543 apps, 104 apps met the selection criteria of this study. These 104 apps were categorized as combined type (n=44), functional type (n=31), or informational type (n=29). A large amount of content specified in the guideline was included in the apps, most notably in the combined type, followed by the multifunctional and informational type; the MARS scores followed the same order (3.64, 3.26, and 3.0, respectively). Regression analysis showed that the sector in which the developer was situated and the feedback channel with the developer had a significant impact on both the content and MARS scores. In addition, problematic apps such as those made by unknown developers or copied and single-function apps were shown to have a large market share.
ConclusionsThis study is the first to evaluate the content and quality of smoking cessation apps by classification. The combined type had higher-quality content and functionality than other app types. The app developer type and feedback channel with the app developer had a significant impact on the overall quality of the apps. In addition, problematic apps and single-function apps were shown to have a large market share. Our results will contribute to the use and development of better smoking cessation apps after considering the problems identified in this study. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-12T12:56:48Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-b27ff6827624422f9a0a4d7789244dc9 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2291-5222 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-12T12:56:48Z |
| publishDate | 2022-02-01 |
| publisher | JMIR Publications |
| record_format | Article |
| series | JMIR mHealth and uHealth |
| spelling | doaj.art-b27ff6827624422f9a0a4d7789244dc92023-08-28T20:49:52ZengJMIR PublicationsJMIR mHealth and uHealth2291-52222022-02-01102e1726810.2196/17268Classification of Smoking Cessation Apps: Quality Review and Content AnalysisSuin Seohttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-5673-671XSung-Il Chohttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-4085-1494Wonjeong Yoonhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-9061-8458Cheol Min Leehttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8652-4355 BackgroundMany people use apps for smoking cessation, and the effectiveness of these apps has been proven in several studies. However, no study has classified these apps and only few studies have analyzed the characteristics of these apps that influence their quality. ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to analyze the content and the quality of smoking cessation apps by type and identify the characteristics that affect their overall quality. MethodsTwo app marketplaces (App Store and Google Play) were searched in January 2018, and the search was completed by May 2020. The search terms used were “stop smoking,” “quit smoking,” and “smoking cessation.” The apps were categorized into 3 types (combined, multifunctional, and informational). The tailored guideline of Clinical Practice Guideline for Treating Tobacco Use and Dependence was utilized for evaluating app content (or functions), and the Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS) was used to evaluate the quality. Chi-square test was performed for the general characteristics, and one-way analysis of variance was performed for MARS analysis. To identify the general features of the apps that could be associated with the MARS and content scores, multiple regression analysis was done. All analyses were performed using SAS software (ver. 9.3). ResultsAmong 1543 apps, 104 apps met the selection criteria of this study. These 104 apps were categorized as combined type (n=44), functional type (n=31), or informational type (n=29). A large amount of content specified in the guideline was included in the apps, most notably in the combined type, followed by the multifunctional and informational type; the MARS scores followed the same order (3.64, 3.26, and 3.0, respectively). Regression analysis showed that the sector in which the developer was situated and the feedback channel with the developer had a significant impact on both the content and MARS scores. In addition, problematic apps such as those made by unknown developers or copied and single-function apps were shown to have a large market share. ConclusionsThis study is the first to evaluate the content and quality of smoking cessation apps by classification. The combined type had higher-quality content and functionality than other app types. The app developer type and feedback channel with the app developer had a significant impact on the overall quality of the apps. In addition, problematic apps and single-function apps were shown to have a large market share. Our results will contribute to the use and development of better smoking cessation apps after considering the problems identified in this study.https://mhealth.jmir.org/2022/2/e17268 |
| spellingShingle | Suin Seo Sung-Il Cho Wonjeong Yoon Cheol Min Lee Classification of Smoking Cessation Apps: Quality Review and Content Analysis JMIR mHealth and uHealth |
| title | Classification of Smoking Cessation Apps: Quality Review and Content Analysis |
| title_full | Classification of Smoking Cessation Apps: Quality Review and Content Analysis |
| title_fullStr | Classification of Smoking Cessation Apps: Quality Review and Content Analysis |
| title_full_unstemmed | Classification of Smoking Cessation Apps: Quality Review and Content Analysis |
| title_short | Classification of Smoking Cessation Apps: Quality Review and Content Analysis |
| title_sort | classification of smoking cessation apps quality review and content analysis |
| url | https://mhealth.jmir.org/2022/2/e17268 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT suinseo classificationofsmokingcessationappsqualityreviewandcontentanalysis AT sungilcho classificationofsmokingcessationappsqualityreviewandcontentanalysis AT wonjeongyoon classificationofsmokingcessationappsqualityreviewandcontentanalysis AT cheolminlee classificationofsmokingcessationappsqualityreviewandcontentanalysis |