Evaluation and comparison of silorane resin composite to glass ionomer in occluso-proximal restorations of primary molars: A randomized controlled trial
Objective: In general, proximal restorations of primary molars fracture, so it is vital to study the new materials that could solve this problem. Hence, the present trial assessed the success of occluso-proximal atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) restorations using silorane and glass ionomer cem...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2022-01-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.jisppd.com/article.asp?issn=0970-4388;year=2022;volume=40;issue=3;spage=281;epage=287;aulast=Maru |
| _version_ | 1811313431233429504 |
|---|---|
| author | Viral P Maru Purva Kulkarni Rewant Chauhan Salil S Bapat |
| author_facet | Viral P Maru Purva Kulkarni Rewant Chauhan Salil S Bapat |
| author_sort | Viral P Maru |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Objective: In general, proximal restorations of primary molars fracture, so it is vital to study the new materials that could solve this problem. Hence, the present trial assessed the success of occluso-proximal atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) restorations using silorane and glass ionomer cement (GIC) in carious primary molars for a period of 2 years. Materials and Methods: One hundred and ninety-two children between the age group of 4 and 9 years were randomly allocated to GIC or silorane. In the clinical set up, they were treated by a pediatric dentist, and their restorations were evaluated at 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. The primary outcome was the survival of restoration, which was analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier and superior Cox regression models. As a sensitivity analysis, intention-to-treat (ITT) was executed. Sex, age, molar, jaw, cavity volume, and caries incidence were the independent variables. Results: The restoration survival after 24 months for GIC and silorane was 82.75% and 88.88%, respectively, whereas ITT analysis showed a success of 84.37% and 89.58% for GIC and silorane, respectively. Conclusion: With regard to longevity, there was no statistically significant difference between silorane and GIC in primary molar occlusoproximal ART restorations. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-13T10:54:54Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-b2810df9660c43de94abc2992d562642 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 0970-4388 1998-3905 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-13T10:54:54Z |
| publishDate | 2022-01-01 |
| publisher | Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry |
| spelling | doaj.art-b2810df9660c43de94abc2992d5626422022-12-22T02:49:34ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry0970-43881998-39052022-01-0140328128710.4103/jisppd.jisppd_377_22Evaluation and comparison of silorane resin composite to glass ionomer in occluso-proximal restorations of primary molars: A randomized controlled trialViral P MaruPurva KulkarniRewant ChauhanSalil S BapatObjective: In general, proximal restorations of primary molars fracture, so it is vital to study the new materials that could solve this problem. Hence, the present trial assessed the success of occluso-proximal atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) restorations using silorane and glass ionomer cement (GIC) in carious primary molars for a period of 2 years. Materials and Methods: One hundred and ninety-two children between the age group of 4 and 9 years were randomly allocated to GIC or silorane. In the clinical set up, they were treated by a pediatric dentist, and their restorations were evaluated at 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. The primary outcome was the survival of restoration, which was analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier and superior Cox regression models. As a sensitivity analysis, intention-to-treat (ITT) was executed. Sex, age, molar, jaw, cavity volume, and caries incidence were the independent variables. Results: The restoration survival after 24 months for GIC and silorane was 82.75% and 88.88%, respectively, whereas ITT analysis showed a success of 84.37% and 89.58% for GIC and silorane, respectively. Conclusion: With regard to longevity, there was no statistically significant difference between silorane and GIC in primary molar occlusoproximal ART restorations.http://www.jisppd.com/article.asp?issn=0970-4388;year=2022;volume=40;issue=3;spage=281;epage=287;aulast=Maruglass ionomer cementproximal carious primary molarsiloranesurvival success |
| spellingShingle | Viral P Maru Purva Kulkarni Rewant Chauhan Salil S Bapat Evaluation and comparison of silorane resin composite to glass ionomer in occluso-proximal restorations of primary molars: A randomized controlled trial Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry glass ionomer cement proximal carious primary molar silorane survival success |
| title | Evaluation and comparison of silorane resin composite to glass ionomer in occluso-proximal restorations of primary molars: A randomized controlled trial |
| title_full | Evaluation and comparison of silorane resin composite to glass ionomer in occluso-proximal restorations of primary molars: A randomized controlled trial |
| title_fullStr | Evaluation and comparison of silorane resin composite to glass ionomer in occluso-proximal restorations of primary molars: A randomized controlled trial |
| title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation and comparison of silorane resin composite to glass ionomer in occluso-proximal restorations of primary molars: A randomized controlled trial |
| title_short | Evaluation and comparison of silorane resin composite to glass ionomer in occluso-proximal restorations of primary molars: A randomized controlled trial |
| title_sort | evaluation and comparison of silorane resin composite to glass ionomer in occluso proximal restorations of primary molars a randomized controlled trial |
| topic | glass ionomer cement proximal carious primary molar silorane survival success |
| url | http://www.jisppd.com/article.asp?issn=0970-4388;year=2022;volume=40;issue=3;spage=281;epage=287;aulast=Maru |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT viralpmaru evaluationandcomparisonofsiloraneresincompositetoglassionomerinocclusoproximalrestorationsofprimarymolarsarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT purvakulkarni evaluationandcomparisonofsiloraneresincompositetoglassionomerinocclusoproximalrestorationsofprimarymolarsarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT rewantchauhan evaluationandcomparisonofsiloraneresincompositetoglassionomerinocclusoproximalrestorationsofprimarymolarsarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT salilsbapat evaluationandcomparisonofsiloraneresincompositetoglassionomerinocclusoproximalrestorationsofprimarymolarsarandomizedcontrolledtrial |