Woodfuel in Rwanda: Impact on Energy, Poverty, Environment and Policy Instruments analysis

Rwanda’s geographical and socio-economic situations have shaped the energy situation and limited access to modern fuels. Woodfuel is the main source of energy for households and its trade a source of income and jobs in rural areas. Currently 85.2% of households’ land holding is less than 1 ha, insuf...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ernest Mazimpaka
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Diponegoro University 2014-02-01
Series:International Journal of Renewable Energy Development
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ijred.cbiore.id/index.php/ijred/article/view/6185
_version_ 1797425077086584832
author Ernest Mazimpaka
author_facet Ernest Mazimpaka
author_sort Ernest Mazimpaka
collection DOAJ
description Rwanda’s geographical and socio-economic situations have shaped the energy situation and limited access to modern fuels. Woodfuel is the main source of energy for households and its trade a source of income and jobs in rural areas. Currently 85.2% of households’ land holding is less than 1 ha, insufficient to grow food and fuelwood for a household of the average size of 5.5 persons. Without well documented reports of the individual impact of each deforestation factor, woodfuels have been most blamed. This paper investigates how the current woodfuel industry impacts on energy, poverty and forests and analyses the woodfuel policy instruments. Considering woodfuel consumption under an only environmental or energy perspective has resulted in a search for a narrowly environmental or energy solution. Both failed to solve the problem of forest depletion. Current regulations limit the benefits traditionally derived from woodfuel commoditisation leading to a negative attitude towards policy instruments. The processes involved in producing charcoal and using it as a cooking fuel is inefficient and resource intensive. The barriers to large dissemination of improved cooking stoves include availability, relatively low cost of woodfuels, lack of improved stove diversity on the local market and weak government policy in regard to the woodfuel industry. Policies aiming to substitute or reduce woodfuel consumption, have not achieved the desired results and their implementations have not unarguably reduced deforestation. The paper recommends the community-based woodfuel production as sustainable management approaches to mobilise community support for sustainable forestry management and woodfuel production.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T08:10:50Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b2931e959138464397b35570304ef350
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2252-4940
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T08:10:50Z
publishDate 2014-02-01
publisher Diponegoro University
record_format Article
series International Journal of Renewable Energy Development
spelling doaj.art-b2931e959138464397b35570304ef3502023-12-02T23:27:27ZengDiponegoro UniversityInternational Journal of Renewable Energy Development2252-49402014-02-0131213210.14710/ijred.3.1.21-325422Woodfuel in Rwanda: Impact on Energy, Poverty, Environment and Policy Instruments analysisErnest Mazimpaka0National University of Rwanda, Faculty of Applied Sciences, RwandaRwanda’s geographical and socio-economic situations have shaped the energy situation and limited access to modern fuels. Woodfuel is the main source of energy for households and its trade a source of income and jobs in rural areas. Currently 85.2% of households’ land holding is less than 1 ha, insufficient to grow food and fuelwood for a household of the average size of 5.5 persons. Without well documented reports of the individual impact of each deforestation factor, woodfuels have been most blamed. This paper investigates how the current woodfuel industry impacts on energy, poverty and forests and analyses the woodfuel policy instruments. Considering woodfuel consumption under an only environmental or energy perspective has resulted in a search for a narrowly environmental or energy solution. Both failed to solve the problem of forest depletion. Current regulations limit the benefits traditionally derived from woodfuel commoditisation leading to a negative attitude towards policy instruments. The processes involved in producing charcoal and using it as a cooking fuel is inefficient and resource intensive. The barriers to large dissemination of improved cooking stoves include availability, relatively low cost of woodfuels, lack of improved stove diversity on the local market and weak government policy in regard to the woodfuel industry. Policies aiming to substitute or reduce woodfuel consumption, have not achieved the desired results and their implementations have not unarguably reduced deforestation. The paper recommends the community-based woodfuel production as sustainable management approaches to mobilise community support for sustainable forestry management and woodfuel production.https://ijred.cbiore.id/index.php/ijred/article/view/6185energy, policies, povertywoodfuelsbansforest degradation
spellingShingle Ernest Mazimpaka
Woodfuel in Rwanda: Impact on Energy, Poverty, Environment and Policy Instruments analysis
International Journal of Renewable Energy Development
energy, policies, poverty
woodfuels
bans
forest degradation
title Woodfuel in Rwanda: Impact on Energy, Poverty, Environment and Policy Instruments analysis
title_full Woodfuel in Rwanda: Impact on Energy, Poverty, Environment and Policy Instruments analysis
title_fullStr Woodfuel in Rwanda: Impact on Energy, Poverty, Environment and Policy Instruments analysis
title_full_unstemmed Woodfuel in Rwanda: Impact on Energy, Poverty, Environment and Policy Instruments analysis
title_short Woodfuel in Rwanda: Impact on Energy, Poverty, Environment and Policy Instruments analysis
title_sort woodfuel in rwanda impact on energy poverty environment and policy instruments analysis
topic energy, policies, poverty
woodfuels
bans
forest degradation
url https://ijred.cbiore.id/index.php/ijred/article/view/6185
work_keys_str_mv AT ernestmazimpaka woodfuelinrwandaimpactonenergypovertyenvironmentandpolicyinstrumentsanalysis