To have value, comparisons of high-throughput phenotyping methods need statistical tests of bias and variance
The gap between genomics and phenomics is narrowing. The rate at which it is narrowing, however, is being slowed by improper statistical comparison of methods. Quantification using Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r) is commonly used to assess method quality, but it is an often misleading statisti...
Main Authors: | Justin M. McGrath, Matthew H. Siebers, Peng Fu, Stephen P. Long, Carl J. Bernacchi |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2024-01-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Plant Science |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2023.1325221/full |
Similar Items
-
Bland-Altman methods for comparing methods of measurement and response to criticisms
by: Mohammad Ali Mansournia, et al.
Published: (2021-11-01) -
Comparison of Clinical Chemistry Analysers ERBA XL-640 vs ERBA XL-1000 for Glucose Estimation
by: Sheetal Paresh Patel, et al.
Published: (2022-04-01) -
Method Comparison (Agreement) Studies: Myths and Rationale
by: Ajay G Phatak, et al.
Published: (2017-01-01) -
Valutazione Della Concordanza Tra Misurazioni di Caratteri di Tipo Quantitativo: Il Metodo di Bland-Altman
by: Francesco Franco, et al.
Published: (2017-02-01) -
BA.plot: An R function for Bland-Altman analysis
by: Kalesh M. Karun, et al.
Published: (2021-10-01)