Comparability Assessment of Serum Electrolytes on Different Autoanalysers Working on the Same Principle

Introduction: Electrolyte measurement of critically ill patients is frequently requested in emergency central laboratory. These are either obtained from Point of Care (POC) electrolyte analysers on urgent basis or processed on the autoanalysers. Accurate and rapid measurement of electrolyte such...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rashmi Gulia, Binita Goswami
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: JCDR Research and Publications Pvt. Ltd. 2019-04-01
Series:National Journal of Laboratory Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.njlm.net/articles/PDF/2354/40678_CE[Ra1]_F(SHU)_PF1(AG_SHU)_PFA(SHU)_PB(AG_SHU)_PN(SHU).pdf
_version_ 1818304629929148416
author Rashmi Gulia
Binita Goswami
author_facet Rashmi Gulia
Binita Goswami
author_sort Rashmi Gulia
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: Electrolyte measurement of critically ill patients is frequently requested in emergency central laboratory. These are either obtained from Point of Care (POC) electrolyte analysers on urgent basis or processed on the autoanalysers. Accurate and rapid measurement of electrolyte such as sodium and potassium help in development of focused course of treatment. Aim: To compare the results of serum electrolytes measured on four different autoanalysers working on the same principle of direct Ion Selective Electrode (ISE) measurement, to determine the extent of agreement amongst them. Materials and Methods: This prospective comparative study was done using 200 patient samples obtained from the Central Biochemistry Laboratory of Lok Nayak Hospital, New Delhi, India. Serum samples were analysed on four different analysers for electrolytes (Na+ and K+), two Roche AVL electrolyte analysers and two Randox Imola autoanalysers working on the same methodology of direct ISE measurement. Means, standard deviations and coefficient of variations were calculated. The Bland-Altman plots were used to compare the results of two different assays and to quantify the limit of agreement. The p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: The mean value for sodium was 135±10.6 mmol/L and 136±10.4 mmol/L for Roche AVL 1 and 2 electrolyte analysers; 140±10.9 mmol/L and 140±10.7 mmol/L for Randox Imola 1 and 2 autoanalysers. Similarly, the mean value for potassium were 4.53±2.86 mmol/L, 4.32±1.03 mmol/L, 4.33±0.97 mmol/L and 4.35±0.94 mmol/L for AVL 1, AVL 2, Imola 1 and Imola 2, respectively. The Bland-Altman plots have shown a good agreement of -0.34 to 0.31 for serum potassium for Imola 1 and AVL 1 however, no such agreement was found for sodium values on inter-analyser comparison. The Bland-Altman plots were used to compare the results of two different assays and to quantify the limit of agreement. The p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Conclusion: Serum electrolytes obtained from electrolyte analysers and autoanalysers showed equivalent results for potassium but not for sodium values. Therefore, potassium values can be used interchangeably from these analysers for making critical decisions but same cannot be concluded for the sodium values. The comparability will be useful to minimize analytical bias and allow the results to be used interchangeably. Obtaining equivalent, rapid and reliable results from ready back-up systems will prove to be time-saving and economical in emergency cases irrespective of the analytical system being used.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T06:13:44Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b29e875b60694fbe8b062071c0829447
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2277-8551
2455-6882
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T06:13:44Z
publishDate 2019-04-01
publisher JCDR Research and Publications Pvt. Ltd.
record_format Article
series National Journal of Laboratory Medicine
spelling doaj.art-b29e875b60694fbe8b062071c08294472022-12-21T23:57:02ZengJCDR Research and Publications Pvt. Ltd.National Journal of Laboratory Medicine2277-85512455-68822019-04-0182BO12BO1510.7860/NJLM/2019/40678:2354Comparability Assessment of Serum Electrolytes on Different Autoanalysers Working on the Same PrincipleRashmi Gulia0Binita Goswami1Senior Resident, Department of Biochemistry, MAMC, Delhi, India.Professor, Department of Biochemistry, MAMC, New Delhi, India.Introduction: Electrolyte measurement of critically ill patients is frequently requested in emergency central laboratory. These are either obtained from Point of Care (POC) electrolyte analysers on urgent basis or processed on the autoanalysers. Accurate and rapid measurement of electrolyte such as sodium and potassium help in development of focused course of treatment. Aim: To compare the results of serum electrolytes measured on four different autoanalysers working on the same principle of direct Ion Selective Electrode (ISE) measurement, to determine the extent of agreement amongst them. Materials and Methods: This prospective comparative study was done using 200 patient samples obtained from the Central Biochemistry Laboratory of Lok Nayak Hospital, New Delhi, India. Serum samples were analysed on four different analysers for electrolytes (Na+ and K+), two Roche AVL electrolyte analysers and two Randox Imola autoanalysers working on the same methodology of direct ISE measurement. Means, standard deviations and coefficient of variations were calculated. The Bland-Altman plots were used to compare the results of two different assays and to quantify the limit of agreement. The p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: The mean value for sodium was 135±10.6 mmol/L and 136±10.4 mmol/L for Roche AVL 1 and 2 electrolyte analysers; 140±10.9 mmol/L and 140±10.7 mmol/L for Randox Imola 1 and 2 autoanalysers. Similarly, the mean value for potassium were 4.53±2.86 mmol/L, 4.32±1.03 mmol/L, 4.33±0.97 mmol/L and 4.35±0.94 mmol/L for AVL 1, AVL 2, Imola 1 and Imola 2, respectively. The Bland-Altman plots have shown a good agreement of -0.34 to 0.31 for serum potassium for Imola 1 and AVL 1 however, no such agreement was found for sodium values on inter-analyser comparison. The Bland-Altman plots were used to compare the results of two different assays and to quantify the limit of agreement. The p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Conclusion: Serum electrolytes obtained from electrolyte analysers and autoanalysers showed equivalent results for potassium but not for sodium values. Therefore, potassium values can be used interchangeably from these analysers for making critical decisions but same cannot be concluded for the sodium values. The comparability will be useful to minimize analytical bias and allow the results to be used interchangeably. Obtaining equivalent, rapid and reliable results from ready back-up systems will prove to be time-saving and economical in emergency cases irrespective of the analytical system being used.http://www.njlm.net/articles/PDF/2354/40678_CE[Ra1]_F(SHU)_PF1(AG_SHU)_PFA(SHU)_PB(AG_SHU)_PN(SHU).pdfagreementbland and altmanion selective electrodepotassiumsodium
spellingShingle Rashmi Gulia
Binita Goswami
Comparability Assessment of Serum Electrolytes on Different Autoanalysers Working on the Same Principle
National Journal of Laboratory Medicine
agreement
bland and altman
ion selective electrode
potassium
sodium
title Comparability Assessment of Serum Electrolytes on Different Autoanalysers Working on the Same Principle
title_full Comparability Assessment of Serum Electrolytes on Different Autoanalysers Working on the Same Principle
title_fullStr Comparability Assessment of Serum Electrolytes on Different Autoanalysers Working on the Same Principle
title_full_unstemmed Comparability Assessment of Serum Electrolytes on Different Autoanalysers Working on the Same Principle
title_short Comparability Assessment of Serum Electrolytes on Different Autoanalysers Working on the Same Principle
title_sort comparability assessment of serum electrolytes on different autoanalysers working on the same principle
topic agreement
bland and altman
ion selective electrode
potassium
sodium
url http://www.njlm.net/articles/PDF/2354/40678_CE[Ra1]_F(SHU)_PF1(AG_SHU)_PFA(SHU)_PB(AG_SHU)_PN(SHU).pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT rashmigulia comparabilityassessmentofserumelectrolytesondifferentautoanalysersworkingonthesameprinciple
AT binitagoswami comparabilityassessmentofserumelectrolytesondifferentautoanalysersworkingonthesameprinciple