Whose well-being? Common conceptions and misconceptions in the enhancement debate
Main Author: | Stephan eSchleim |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2014-08-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnsys.2014.00148/full |
Similar Items
-
Critical Neuroscience – or Critical Science? A Perspective on the Perceived Normative Significance of Neuroscience
by: Stephan eSchleim, et al.
Published: (2014-05-01) -
Real Neurolaw in the Netherlands: The Role of the Developing Brain in the New Adolescent Criminal Law
by: Stephan Schleim
Published: (2020-07-01) -
Neuroscience Education Begins With Good Science: Communication About Phineas Gage (1823–1860), One of Neurology’s Most-Famous Patients, in Scientific Articles
by: Stephan Schleim
Published: (2022-04-01) -
Neurorights in History: A Contemporary Review of José M. R. Delgado’s “Physical Control of the Mind” (1969) and Elliot S. Valenstein’s “Brain Control” (1973)
by: Stephan Schleim
Published: (2021-10-01) -
Neuroenhancement as Instrumental Drug Use: Putting the Debate in a Different Frame
by: Stephan Schleim
Published: (2020-09-01)