Editoriale – Etichettare / descrivere / mostrare
It wouldn’t be too wrong, to assert that the modern debate about the faculty of taste has almost entirely been translated into the contemporary dispute about the aesthetic experience. And, right or wrong, the work of art remains here the primary point of reference. However, in both continental and a...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Firenze University Press
2012-05-01
|
Series: | Aisthesis |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://oajournals.fupress.net/index.php/aisthesis/article/view/576 |
_version_ | 1818682205138845696 |
---|---|
author | Filippo Fimiani Pietro Kobau |
author_facet | Filippo Fimiani Pietro Kobau |
author_sort | Filippo Fimiani |
collection | DOAJ |
description | It wouldn’t be too wrong, to assert that the modern debate about the faculty of taste has almost entirely been translated into the contemporary dispute about the aesthetic experience. And, right or wrong, the work of art remains here the primary point of reference. However, in both continental and analytical traditions, the discussion about the “what” of the aesthetic experience – normally intended as the experience of an artwork, and the experience made by a spectator with particular attitudes and expectations – has not reached even the maturity of a minimal number of shared theories. Moreover, this whole question has not even been outlined as a commonly accepted and structured problem. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-17T10:15:08Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-b2ac30e2a58c4b25b636e10c332bf685 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2035-8466 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-17T10:15:08Z |
publishDate | 2012-05-01 |
publisher | Firenze University Press |
record_format | Article |
series | Aisthesis |
spelling | doaj.art-b2ac30e2a58c4b25b636e10c332bf6852022-12-21T21:52:56ZengFirenze University PressAisthesis2035-84662012-05-0142Editoriale – Etichettare / descrivere / mostrareFilippo FimianiPietro KobauIt wouldn’t be too wrong, to assert that the modern debate about the faculty of taste has almost entirely been translated into the contemporary dispute about the aesthetic experience. And, right or wrong, the work of art remains here the primary point of reference. However, in both continental and analytical traditions, the discussion about the “what” of the aesthetic experience – normally intended as the experience of an artwork, and the experience made by a spectator with particular attitudes and expectations – has not reached even the maturity of a minimal number of shared theories. Moreover, this whole question has not even been outlined as a commonly accepted and structured problem.https://oajournals.fupress.net/index.php/aisthesis/article/view/576Work of artLabelDescription |
spellingShingle | Filippo Fimiani Pietro Kobau Editoriale – Etichettare / descrivere / mostrare Aisthesis Work of art Label Description |
title | Editoriale – Etichettare / descrivere / mostrare |
title_full | Editoriale – Etichettare / descrivere / mostrare |
title_fullStr | Editoriale – Etichettare / descrivere / mostrare |
title_full_unstemmed | Editoriale – Etichettare / descrivere / mostrare |
title_short | Editoriale – Etichettare / descrivere / mostrare |
title_sort | editoriale etichettare descrivere mostrare |
topic | Work of art Label Description |
url | https://oajournals.fupress.net/index.php/aisthesis/article/view/576 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT filippofimiani editorialeetichettaredescriveremostrare AT pietrokobau editorialeetichettaredescriveremostrare |