Penile burn reconstruction after self-mutilation using electrothermal device-a case report

Introduction: Isolated genital burns are not frequent injuries; more often, they are part of larger surface-area burn injuries. Aetiology and mechanisms of genital burn injuries differ regarding country, age and patients’ socioeconomic status. Aim: The aim is to describe a rare case report of a 69-y...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alica Hokynková, Petr Šín, Gabriela Michalčáková, Aleš Čermák, Andrea Pokorná
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2024-04-01
Series:Burns Open
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S246891222400021X
_version_ 1827279077585715200
author Alica Hokynková
Petr Šín
Gabriela Michalčáková
Aleš Čermák
Andrea Pokorná
author_facet Alica Hokynková
Petr Šín
Gabriela Michalčáková
Aleš Čermák
Andrea Pokorná
author_sort Alica Hokynková
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: Isolated genital burns are not frequent injuries; more often, they are part of larger surface-area burn injuries. Aetiology and mechanisms of genital burn injuries differ regarding country, age and patients’ socioeconomic status. Aim: The aim is to describe a rare case report of a 69-year-old man who incurred a deep penile burn after using an electrothermal sexual device. Methods: The patient was admitted to the Department of Urology (blinded for review) with deep penile burn a week after the injury. Debridement, conservative therapy, and deferred reconstruction due to extensive lymphoedema were performed. Due to numerous small, contracted skin scars of penile corpus arising from multiple healed burns caused by self-mutilation by repeatedly using an electrothermal sexual device, the penile defect reconstruction was performed. A local ventral foreskin skin flap in combination with a full split-thickness graft was done in order to avoid extensive scar contracture with possible penile deviation. Results: There were no complications in postoperative care in the follow-up period of 26 months, with satisfactory aesthetical and functional results. Conclusion: In the case of penile wounds, the reconstruction technique depends on the injury's size, depth and localisation of the damage.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T08:13:09Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b2b041fdb05646e992d8779fba7b0c0d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2468-9122
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T08:13:09Z
publishDate 2024-04-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Burns Open
spelling doaj.art-b2b041fdb05646e992d8779fba7b0c0d2024-04-17T04:49:40ZengElsevierBurns Open2468-91222024-04-0182143146Penile burn reconstruction after self-mutilation using electrothermal device-a case reportAlica Hokynková0Petr Šín1Gabriela Michalčáková2Aleš Čermák3Andrea Pokorná4Department of Burns and Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Brno, Czech Republic, Jihlavská 20, 625 00 Brno, Czech Republic; Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Kamenice 5, 625 00 Brno, Czech RepublicDepartment of Burns and Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Brno, Czech Republic, Jihlavská 20, 625 00 Brno, Czech Republic; Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Kamenice 5, 625 00 Brno, Czech Republic; Corresponding author at: Department of Burns and Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Brno, Czech Republic, Jihlavská 20, 625 00 Brno, Czech Republic.Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Kamenice 5, 625 00 Brno, Czech RepublicDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Brno, Czech Republic, Jihlavská 20, 625 00 Brno, Czech Republic; Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Kamenice 5, 625 00 Brno, Czech RepublicDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Kamenice 5, 625 00 Brno, Czech RepublicIntroduction: Isolated genital burns are not frequent injuries; more often, they are part of larger surface-area burn injuries. Aetiology and mechanisms of genital burn injuries differ regarding country, age and patients’ socioeconomic status. Aim: The aim is to describe a rare case report of a 69-year-old man who incurred a deep penile burn after using an electrothermal sexual device. Methods: The patient was admitted to the Department of Urology (blinded for review) with deep penile burn a week after the injury. Debridement, conservative therapy, and deferred reconstruction due to extensive lymphoedema were performed. Due to numerous small, contracted skin scars of penile corpus arising from multiple healed burns caused by self-mutilation by repeatedly using an electrothermal sexual device, the penile defect reconstruction was performed. A local ventral foreskin skin flap in combination with a full split-thickness graft was done in order to avoid extensive scar contracture with possible penile deviation. Results: There were no complications in postoperative care in the follow-up period of 26 months, with satisfactory aesthetical and functional results. Conclusion: In the case of penile wounds, the reconstruction technique depends on the injury's size, depth and localisation of the damage.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S246891222400021XPenile burnCase reportPlastic surgerySelf-mutilationMultidisciplinary treatment
spellingShingle Alica Hokynková
Petr Šín
Gabriela Michalčáková
Aleš Čermák
Andrea Pokorná
Penile burn reconstruction after self-mutilation using electrothermal device-a case report
Burns Open
Penile burn
Case report
Plastic surgery
Self-mutilation
Multidisciplinary treatment
title Penile burn reconstruction after self-mutilation using electrothermal device-a case report
title_full Penile burn reconstruction after self-mutilation using electrothermal device-a case report
title_fullStr Penile burn reconstruction after self-mutilation using electrothermal device-a case report
title_full_unstemmed Penile burn reconstruction after self-mutilation using electrothermal device-a case report
title_short Penile burn reconstruction after self-mutilation using electrothermal device-a case report
title_sort penile burn reconstruction after self mutilation using electrothermal device a case report
topic Penile burn
Case report
Plastic surgery
Self-mutilation
Multidisciplinary treatment
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S246891222400021X
work_keys_str_mv AT alicahokynkova penileburnreconstructionafterselfmutilationusingelectrothermaldeviceacasereport
AT petrsin penileburnreconstructionafterselfmutilationusingelectrothermaldeviceacasereport
AT gabrielamichalcakova penileburnreconstructionafterselfmutilationusingelectrothermaldeviceacasereport
AT alescermak penileburnreconstructionafterselfmutilationusingelectrothermaldeviceacasereport
AT andreapokorna penileburnreconstructionafterselfmutilationusingelectrothermaldeviceacasereport