How to Design a National Aggregated Ranking?
The article presents a new method of designing a national ranking of higher education institutions on the basis of aggregating all existing public national rankings. The new aggregating method MetALeague (Method of Analysis of Leagues) can help to do away with monopoly in evaluation, thus, providing...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Moscow Polytechnic University
2020-02-01
|
| Series: | Высшее образование в России |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://vovr.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/2070 |
| _version_ | 1797217663384027136 |
|---|---|
| author | V. A. Bolotov G. N. Motova V. G. Navodnov O. E. Ryzhakova |
| author_facet | V. A. Bolotov G. N. Motova V. G. Navodnov O. E. Ryzhakova |
| author_sort | V. A. Bolotov |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The article presents a new method of designing a national ranking of higher education institutions on the basis of aggregating all existing public national rankings. The new aggregating method MetALeague (Method of Analysis of Leagues) can help to do away with monopoly in evaluation, thus, providing room for independent evaluation of HEIs. The analysis of the current state of procedures and methods of independent evaluation of Russian HEIs in the form of rankings and databases was carried out. The suggested MetALeague method is based on the mathematical tool of the voting theory in small groups and helps to combine different independent evaluations in a single format. A possible approach to creating such a unified national ranking in the form of 10 leagues is considered and the calculation results are presented. The developed ranking methods and the obtained results can be useful for self-diagnosis and promotion of research, organizational and methodological activities of HEIs, and also when introducing a risk-oriented approach in oversight activities. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-08T05:38:07Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-b2bf7b996f5b4fbeb75dbf5292d65eef |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 0869-3617 2072-0459 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-24T12:05:26Z |
| publishDate | 2020-02-01 |
| publisher | Moscow Polytechnic University |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Высшее образование в России |
| spelling | doaj.art-b2bf7b996f5b4fbeb75dbf5292d65eef2024-04-08T12:12:08ZengMoscow Polytechnic UniversityВысшее образование в России0869-36172072-04592020-02-0129192410.31992/0869-3617-2020-29-1-9-241537How to Design a National Aggregated Ranking?V. A. Bolotov0G. N. Motova1V. G. Navodnov2O. E. Ryzhakova3National Research University Higher School of EconomicsNational Centre for Public AccreditationNational Centre for Public AccreditationVolga State University of TechnologyThe article presents a new method of designing a national ranking of higher education institutions on the basis of aggregating all existing public national rankings. The new aggregating method MetALeague (Method of Analysis of Leagues) can help to do away with monopoly in evaluation, thus, providing room for independent evaluation of HEIs. The analysis of the current state of procedures and methods of independent evaluation of Russian HEIs in the form of rankings and databases was carried out. The suggested MetALeague method is based on the mathematical tool of the voting theory in small groups and helps to combine different independent evaluations in a single format. A possible approach to creating such a unified national ranking in the form of 10 leagues is considered and the calculation results are presented. The developed ranking methods and the obtained results can be useful for self-diagnosis and promotion of research, organizational and methodological activities of HEIs, and also when introducing a risk-oriented approach in oversight activities.https://vovr.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/2070ranking of higher education institutionsratingnational aggregated rankingleague tablemetaleague methodconvolution procedureindependent evaluation of heis’ activitiesrisk-oriented approach |
| spellingShingle | V. A. Bolotov G. N. Motova V. G. Navodnov O. E. Ryzhakova How to Design a National Aggregated Ranking? Высшее образование в России ranking of higher education institutions rating national aggregated ranking league table metaleague method convolution procedure independent evaluation of heis’ activities risk-oriented approach |
| title | How to Design a National Aggregated Ranking? |
| title_full | How to Design a National Aggregated Ranking? |
| title_fullStr | How to Design a National Aggregated Ranking? |
| title_full_unstemmed | How to Design a National Aggregated Ranking? |
| title_short | How to Design a National Aggregated Ranking? |
| title_sort | how to design a national aggregated ranking |
| topic | ranking of higher education institutions rating national aggregated ranking league table metaleague method convolution procedure independent evaluation of heis’ activities risk-oriented approach |
| url | https://vovr.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/2070 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT vabolotov howtodesignanationalaggregatedranking AT gnmotova howtodesignanationalaggregatedranking AT vgnavodnov howtodesignanationalaggregatedranking AT oeryzhakova howtodesignanationalaggregatedranking |