Online boycott: criminal action or reaction at the level of international law

In today's age, the Internet as a wide and important communication tool can be sanctioned based on Article 41 of the United Nations Charter and international laws under the guaranty of implementation. Despite this prediction, no clear action has been reported by the Security Council in this reg...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Abolfath Khaleghi, Parisa Saghafi
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Allameh Tabataba'i University Press 2022-09-01
Series:Faṣlnāmah-i Pizhūhish-i Huqūq-i Kiyfarī
Subjects:
Online Access:https://jclr.atu.ac.ir/article_15290_a3c864b28388f600f7015b6513ab9c6e.pdf
_version_ 1797369120769966080
author Abolfath Khaleghi
Parisa Saghafi
author_facet Abolfath Khaleghi
Parisa Saghafi
author_sort Abolfath Khaleghi
collection DOAJ
description In today's age, the Internet as a wide and important communication tool can be sanctioned based on Article 41 of the United Nations Charter and international laws under the guaranty of implementation. Despite this prediction, no clear action has been reported by the Security Council in this regard. Although in practice, these are the governments that apply this restriction against each other without any permission and legal order and accept such restrictions within the limits of their international treaties and legal principles, but this is only as long as the countries are within the scope of power. have not taken action. In this case, instead of being a guarantee of enforcement, the internet ban becomes criminal in nature and is condemned by another enforcement guarantee. With the studies carried out in this research, in a descriptive-analytical way, the internet embargo is expressed in two distinct concepts and examples, one time as a guarantee of implementation and another time as an international crime, and finally, this is expected from the Security Council with Such behavior that violates international security and peace on a macro level, such as war and internet terrorism, and the International criminal Court should apply the necessary procedures for judicial proceedings
first_indexed 2024-03-08T17:42:10Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b2cc1e8f08c340b1b6f0a00c18eae65f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2345-3575
2476-6224
language fas
last_indexed 2024-03-08T17:42:10Z
publishDate 2022-09-01
publisher Allameh Tabataba'i University Press
record_format Article
series Faṣlnāmah-i Pizhūhish-i Huqūq-i Kiyfarī
spelling doaj.art-b2cc1e8f08c340b1b6f0a00c18eae65f2024-01-02T10:58:30ZfasAllameh Tabataba'i University PressFaṣlnāmah-i Pizhūhish-i Huqūq-i Kiyfarī2345-35752476-62242022-09-01114010512510.22054/jclr.2023.59356.229715290Online boycott: criminal action or reaction at the level of international lawAbolfath Khaleghi0Parisa Saghafi1Associate Professor, faculty of Law. The University of Qom, Qom, IranPhD, candidate of Criminal Law and Criminology, The University of Qom, Qom, IranIn today's age, the Internet as a wide and important communication tool can be sanctioned based on Article 41 of the United Nations Charter and international laws under the guaranty of implementation. Despite this prediction, no clear action has been reported by the Security Council in this regard. Although in practice, these are the governments that apply this restriction against each other without any permission and legal order and accept such restrictions within the limits of their international treaties and legal principles, but this is only as long as the countries are within the scope of power. have not taken action. In this case, instead of being a guarantee of enforcement, the internet ban becomes criminal in nature and is condemned by another enforcement guarantee. With the studies carried out in this research, in a descriptive-analytical way, the internet embargo is expressed in two distinct concepts and examples, one time as a guarantee of implementation and another time as an international crime, and finally, this is expected from the Security Council with Such behavior that violates international security and peace on a macro level, such as war and internet terrorism, and the International criminal Court should apply the necessary procedures for judicial proceedingshttps://jclr.atu.ac.ir/article_15290_a3c864b28388f600f7015b6513ab9c6e.pdfsanctions (boycott)enforcement guaranteesinternetinternational law
spellingShingle Abolfath Khaleghi
Parisa Saghafi
Online boycott: criminal action or reaction at the level of international law
Faṣlnāmah-i Pizhūhish-i Huqūq-i Kiyfarī
sanctions (boycott)
enforcement guarantees
internet
international law
title Online boycott: criminal action or reaction at the level of international law
title_full Online boycott: criminal action or reaction at the level of international law
title_fullStr Online boycott: criminal action or reaction at the level of international law
title_full_unstemmed Online boycott: criminal action or reaction at the level of international law
title_short Online boycott: criminal action or reaction at the level of international law
title_sort online boycott criminal action or reaction at the level of international law
topic sanctions (boycott)
enforcement guarantees
internet
international law
url https://jclr.atu.ac.ir/article_15290_a3c864b28388f600f7015b6513ab9c6e.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT abolfathkhaleghi onlineboycottcriminalactionorreactionatthelevelofinternationallaw
AT parisasaghafi onlineboycottcriminalactionorreactionatthelevelofinternationallaw