Detection of colorectal serrated polyps by stool DNA testing: comparison with fecal immunochemical testing for occult blood (FIT).

Precursors to 1/3 of colorectal cancer (CRC), serrated polyps have been under-detected by screening due to their inconspicuous, non-hemorrhagic, and proximal nature. A new multi-target stool DNA test (multi-target sDNA) shows high sensitivity for both CRC and advanced adenomas. Screen detection of s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Russell I Heigh, Tracy C Yab, William R Taylor, Fareeda T N Hussain, Thomas C Smyrk, Douglas W Mahoney, Michael J Domanico, Barry M Berger, Graham P Lidgard, David A Ahlquist
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2014-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3896420?pdf=render
_version_ 1819138777253150720
author Russell I Heigh
Tracy C Yab
William R Taylor
Fareeda T N Hussain
Thomas C Smyrk
Douglas W Mahoney
Michael J Domanico
Barry M Berger
Graham P Lidgard
David A Ahlquist
author_facet Russell I Heigh
Tracy C Yab
William R Taylor
Fareeda T N Hussain
Thomas C Smyrk
Douglas W Mahoney
Michael J Domanico
Barry M Berger
Graham P Lidgard
David A Ahlquist
author_sort Russell I Heigh
collection DOAJ
description Precursors to 1/3 of colorectal cancer (CRC), serrated polyps have been under-detected by screening due to their inconspicuous, non-hemorrhagic, and proximal nature. A new multi-target stool DNA test (multi-target sDNA) shows high sensitivity for both CRC and advanced adenomas. Screen detection of serrated polyps by this approach requires further validation. We sought to assess and compare noninvasive detection of sessile serrated polyps (SSP) ≥ 1 cm by sDNA and an occult blood fecal immunochemical test (FIT).In a blinded prospective study, a single stool sample used for both tests was collected from 456 asymptomatic adults prior to screening or surveillance colonoscopy (criterion standard). All 29 patients with SSP ≥ 1 cm were included as cases and all 232 with no neoplastic findings as controls. Buffered stool samples were processed and frozen on receipt; Exact Sciences performed sDNA in batches using optimized analytical methods. The sDNA multi-marker panel targets methylated BMP3 (mBMP3) and NDRG4, mutant KRAS, β-actin, and hemoglobin. FIT (Polymedco OC-FIT Check) was performed in separate lab ≤ 2 days post defecation and evaluated at cutoffs of 50 (FIT-50) and 100 ng/ml (FIT-100).MEDIAN AGES: cases 61 (range 57-77), controls 62 (52-70), p = NS. Women comprised 59% and 51%, p = NS, respectively. SSP median size was 1.2 cm (1-3 cm), 93% were proximal, and 64% had synchronous diminutive polyps. Among multi-target sDNA markers, mBMP3 proved highly discriminant for detection of SSP ≥ 1 cm (AUC = 0.87, p<0.00001); other DNA markers provided no incremental sensitivity. Hemoglobin alone showed no discrimination (AUC = 0.50, p = NS). At matched specificities, detection of SSP ≥ 1 cm by stool mBMP3 was significantly greater than by FIT-50 (66% vs 10%, p = 0.0003) or FIT-100 (63% vs 0%, p<0.0001).In a screening and surveillance setting, SSP ≥ 1 cm can be detected noninvasively by stool assay of exfoliated DNA markers, especially mBMP3. FIT appears to have no value in SSP detection.
first_indexed 2024-12-22T11:12:09Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b2df20b3bbd2472cac0ea80c87798662
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-22T11:12:09Z
publishDate 2014-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-b2df20b3bbd2472cac0ea80c877986622022-12-21T18:28:07ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032014-01-0191e8565910.1371/journal.pone.0085659Detection of colorectal serrated polyps by stool DNA testing: comparison with fecal immunochemical testing for occult blood (FIT).Russell I HeighTracy C YabWilliam R TaylorFareeda T N HussainThomas C SmyrkDouglas W MahoneyMichael J DomanicoBarry M BergerGraham P LidgardDavid A AhlquistPrecursors to 1/3 of colorectal cancer (CRC), serrated polyps have been under-detected by screening due to their inconspicuous, non-hemorrhagic, and proximal nature. A new multi-target stool DNA test (multi-target sDNA) shows high sensitivity for both CRC and advanced adenomas. Screen detection of serrated polyps by this approach requires further validation. We sought to assess and compare noninvasive detection of sessile serrated polyps (SSP) ≥ 1 cm by sDNA and an occult blood fecal immunochemical test (FIT).In a blinded prospective study, a single stool sample used for both tests was collected from 456 asymptomatic adults prior to screening or surveillance colonoscopy (criterion standard). All 29 patients with SSP ≥ 1 cm were included as cases and all 232 with no neoplastic findings as controls. Buffered stool samples were processed and frozen on receipt; Exact Sciences performed sDNA in batches using optimized analytical methods. The sDNA multi-marker panel targets methylated BMP3 (mBMP3) and NDRG4, mutant KRAS, β-actin, and hemoglobin. FIT (Polymedco OC-FIT Check) was performed in separate lab ≤ 2 days post defecation and evaluated at cutoffs of 50 (FIT-50) and 100 ng/ml (FIT-100).MEDIAN AGES: cases 61 (range 57-77), controls 62 (52-70), p = NS. Women comprised 59% and 51%, p = NS, respectively. SSP median size was 1.2 cm (1-3 cm), 93% were proximal, and 64% had synchronous diminutive polyps. Among multi-target sDNA markers, mBMP3 proved highly discriminant for detection of SSP ≥ 1 cm (AUC = 0.87, p<0.00001); other DNA markers provided no incremental sensitivity. Hemoglobin alone showed no discrimination (AUC = 0.50, p = NS). At matched specificities, detection of SSP ≥ 1 cm by stool mBMP3 was significantly greater than by FIT-50 (66% vs 10%, p = 0.0003) or FIT-100 (63% vs 0%, p<0.0001).In a screening and surveillance setting, SSP ≥ 1 cm can be detected noninvasively by stool assay of exfoliated DNA markers, especially mBMP3. FIT appears to have no value in SSP detection.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3896420?pdf=render
spellingShingle Russell I Heigh
Tracy C Yab
William R Taylor
Fareeda T N Hussain
Thomas C Smyrk
Douglas W Mahoney
Michael J Domanico
Barry M Berger
Graham P Lidgard
David A Ahlquist
Detection of colorectal serrated polyps by stool DNA testing: comparison with fecal immunochemical testing for occult blood (FIT).
PLoS ONE
title Detection of colorectal serrated polyps by stool DNA testing: comparison with fecal immunochemical testing for occult blood (FIT).
title_full Detection of colorectal serrated polyps by stool DNA testing: comparison with fecal immunochemical testing for occult blood (FIT).
title_fullStr Detection of colorectal serrated polyps by stool DNA testing: comparison with fecal immunochemical testing for occult blood (FIT).
title_full_unstemmed Detection of colorectal serrated polyps by stool DNA testing: comparison with fecal immunochemical testing for occult blood (FIT).
title_short Detection of colorectal serrated polyps by stool DNA testing: comparison with fecal immunochemical testing for occult blood (FIT).
title_sort detection of colorectal serrated polyps by stool dna testing comparison with fecal immunochemical testing for occult blood fit
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3896420?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT russelliheigh detectionofcolorectalserratedpolypsbystooldnatestingcomparisonwithfecalimmunochemicaltestingforoccultbloodfit
AT tracycyab detectionofcolorectalserratedpolypsbystooldnatestingcomparisonwithfecalimmunochemicaltestingforoccultbloodfit
AT williamrtaylor detectionofcolorectalserratedpolypsbystooldnatestingcomparisonwithfecalimmunochemicaltestingforoccultbloodfit
AT fareedatnhussain detectionofcolorectalserratedpolypsbystooldnatestingcomparisonwithfecalimmunochemicaltestingforoccultbloodfit
AT thomascsmyrk detectionofcolorectalserratedpolypsbystooldnatestingcomparisonwithfecalimmunochemicaltestingforoccultbloodfit
AT douglaswmahoney detectionofcolorectalserratedpolypsbystooldnatestingcomparisonwithfecalimmunochemicaltestingforoccultbloodfit
AT michaeljdomanico detectionofcolorectalserratedpolypsbystooldnatestingcomparisonwithfecalimmunochemicaltestingforoccultbloodfit
AT barrymberger detectionofcolorectalserratedpolypsbystooldnatestingcomparisonwithfecalimmunochemicaltestingforoccultbloodfit
AT grahamplidgard detectionofcolorectalserratedpolypsbystooldnatestingcomparisonwithfecalimmunochemicaltestingforoccultbloodfit
AT davidaahlquist detectionofcolorectalserratedpolypsbystooldnatestingcomparisonwithfecalimmunochemicaltestingforoccultbloodfit