Quo Vadis Social Research?
In presented paper we try to open problems which are related to research in social sciences and to prediction power of social science theories. According to the prevailing opinion, human behaviour is predictable, if not with the mathematical precision, so still at least with a certain degree of prob...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | ces |
Published: |
Trnava University, Faculty of Law
2015-12-01
|
Series: | Societas et Iurisprudentia |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://sei.iuridica.truni.sk/archive/2015/04/SEI-2015-04-Essays-Siskovic-Stefan.pdf |
_version_ | 1797688087160029184 |
---|---|
author | Štefan Siskovič |
author_facet | Štefan Siskovič |
author_sort | Štefan Siskovič |
collection | DOAJ |
description | In presented paper we try to open problems which are related to research in social sciences and to prediction power of social science theories. According to the prevailing opinion, human behaviour is predictable, if not with the mathematical precision, so still at least with a certain degree of probability. Even though, we are unable and we will be unable to predict future changes in hierarchy of our values. This is because the relationship between the normative and causal worlds is not logical; therefore, how they influence each other remains hidden to us. This causes that individual freedom still plays its role in social sciences and cannot be entirely excluded from scientific discourse. But this doesn’t mean that legal science should keep its autonomous status. On the contrary, legal science should try to find connection to other science disciplines and use their research outcomes for verifications of its own theories. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-12T01:26:33Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-b2e35288580b47cca3c9f3503ee8573d |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1339-5467 |
language | ces |
last_indexed | 2024-03-12T01:26:33Z |
publishDate | 2015-12-01 |
publisher | Trnava University, Faculty of Law |
record_format | Article |
series | Societas et Iurisprudentia |
spelling | doaj.art-b2e35288580b47cca3c9f3503ee8573d2023-09-12T18:06:04ZcesTrnava University, Faculty of LawSocietas et Iurisprudentia1339-54672015-12-0134116127Quo Vadis Social Research?Štefan Siskovič0Trnava University in Trnava, Trnava, Slovak RepublicIn presented paper we try to open problems which are related to research in social sciences and to prediction power of social science theories. According to the prevailing opinion, human behaviour is predictable, if not with the mathematical precision, so still at least with a certain degree of probability. Even though, we are unable and we will be unable to predict future changes in hierarchy of our values. This is because the relationship between the normative and causal worlds is not logical; therefore, how they influence each other remains hidden to us. This causes that individual freedom still plays its role in social sciences and cannot be entirely excluded from scientific discourse. But this doesn’t mean that legal science should keep its autonomous status. On the contrary, legal science should try to find connection to other science disciplines and use their research outcomes for verifications of its own theories.http://sei.iuridica.truni.sk/archive/2015/04/SEI-2015-04-Essays-Siskovic-Stefan.pdfsciencesocial sciencespatternpredictiondeterminismprobabilismfreedom |
spellingShingle | Štefan Siskovič Quo Vadis Social Research? Societas et Iurisprudentia science social sciences pattern prediction determinism probabilism freedom |
title | Quo Vadis Social Research? |
title_full | Quo Vadis Social Research? |
title_fullStr | Quo Vadis Social Research? |
title_full_unstemmed | Quo Vadis Social Research? |
title_short | Quo Vadis Social Research? |
title_sort | quo vadis social research |
topic | science social sciences pattern prediction determinism probabilism freedom |
url | http://sei.iuridica.truni.sk/archive/2015/04/SEI-2015-04-Essays-Siskovic-Stefan.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stefansiskovic quovadissocialresearch |