Choosing what we like vs liking what we choose: How choice-induced preference change might actually be instrumental to decision-making.
For more than 60 years, it has been known that people report higher (lower) subjective values for items after having selected (rejected) them during a choice task. This phenomenon is coined "choice-induced preference change" or CIPC, and its established interpretation is that of "cogn...
Main Authors: | Douglas Lee, Jean Daunizeau |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2020-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231081 |
Similar Items
-
“We choose this CV because we choose diversity” – What do eye movements say about the choices recruiters make?
by: Sayaka Osanami Törngren, et al.
Published: (2024-03-01) -
What will we choose to learn from the COVID-19 pandemic?
by: Agnes Binagwaho, et al.
Published: (2021-08-01) -
What might judgment and decision making research be like if we took a Bayesian approach to hypothesis testing?
by: William J. Matthews, et al.
Published: (2011-12-01) -
I choose, therefore I like: preference for faces induced by arbitrary choice.
by: Koyo Nakamura, et al.
Published: (2013-01-01) -
What buildings policy might look like if we took climate change seriously
by: Fawcett, T, et al.
Published: (2019)