Does political risk matter for infrastructure investments? Empirical evidence

ABSTRACTInfrastructure assets are vital for economic development and integration, but they also encompass political risks. In Africa, infrastructure assets have remained a paradox where there is great potential for opportunities but very few projects get to the final phases. Adequate infrastructure...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Margaret Rutendo Magwedere, Godfrey Marozva
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2023-12-01
Series:Development Studies Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/21665095.2022.2146596
_version_ 1797393016619532288
author Margaret Rutendo Magwedere
Godfrey Marozva
author_facet Margaret Rutendo Magwedere
Godfrey Marozva
author_sort Margaret Rutendo Magwedere
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACTInfrastructure assets are vital for economic development and integration, but they also encompass political risks. In Africa, infrastructure assets have remained a paradox where there is great potential for opportunities but very few projects get to the final phases. Adequate infrastructure can propagate the attainment of the Sustainable Development Goals whilst supporting recovery from the Covid-19 pandemic. Drawing from a longitudinal data set from 2000 to 2021 for 35 African countries, the paper empirically examined the nexus between infrastructure and political risk. Several techniques were employed to determine the dynamic effect, cointegration and causality between infrastructure and political risk. Controlling for the potential endogeneity in infrastructure the system Generalized Method of Moments, the relationship between political risk and infrastructure was ascertained. Furthermore, the ARDL-PMG was employed to determine the cointegration and causal relationship between infrastructure and political risk. The results suggest a cointegration between infrastructure assets and political risk. Infrastructure adjusts to changes in political risk to its long-run equilibrium at a speed of adjustment of 16.9 per cent. Bridging infrastructure gaps in Africa requires an extensive set of actions. Thus, the policy derivatives of our findings, suggest controlling the proliferation of political risk to support infrastructure investment.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T23:56:04Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b30e3248b64646c1b302c39dd058bf2b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2166-5095
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T23:56:04Z
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series Development Studies Research
spelling doaj.art-b30e3248b64646c1b302c39dd058bf2b2023-12-13T04:57:02ZengTaylor & Francis GroupDevelopment Studies Research2166-50952023-12-0110110.1080/21665095.2022.2146596Does political risk matter for infrastructure investments? Empirical evidenceMargaret Rutendo Magwedere0Godfrey Marozva1Department of Finance, Risk Management and Banking, University of South Africa, Pretoria, South AfricaDepartment of Finance, Risk Management and Banking, University of South Africa, Pretoria, South AfricaABSTRACTInfrastructure assets are vital for economic development and integration, but they also encompass political risks. In Africa, infrastructure assets have remained a paradox where there is great potential for opportunities but very few projects get to the final phases. Adequate infrastructure can propagate the attainment of the Sustainable Development Goals whilst supporting recovery from the Covid-19 pandemic. Drawing from a longitudinal data set from 2000 to 2021 for 35 African countries, the paper empirically examined the nexus between infrastructure and political risk. Several techniques were employed to determine the dynamic effect, cointegration and causality between infrastructure and political risk. Controlling for the potential endogeneity in infrastructure the system Generalized Method of Moments, the relationship between political risk and infrastructure was ascertained. Furthermore, the ARDL-PMG was employed to determine the cointegration and causal relationship between infrastructure and political risk. The results suggest a cointegration between infrastructure assets and political risk. Infrastructure adjusts to changes in political risk to its long-run equilibrium at a speed of adjustment of 16.9 per cent. Bridging infrastructure gaps in Africa requires an extensive set of actions. Thus, the policy derivatives of our findings, suggest controlling the proliferation of political risk to support infrastructure investment.https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/21665095.2022.2146596Political riskinfrastructure investmentsystem GMMcausalityerror correction termC40
spellingShingle Margaret Rutendo Magwedere
Godfrey Marozva
Does political risk matter for infrastructure investments? Empirical evidence
Development Studies Research
Political risk
infrastructure investment
system GMM
causality
error correction term
C40
title Does political risk matter for infrastructure investments? Empirical evidence
title_full Does political risk matter for infrastructure investments? Empirical evidence
title_fullStr Does political risk matter for infrastructure investments? Empirical evidence
title_full_unstemmed Does political risk matter for infrastructure investments? Empirical evidence
title_short Does political risk matter for infrastructure investments? Empirical evidence
title_sort does political risk matter for infrastructure investments empirical evidence
topic Political risk
infrastructure investment
system GMM
causality
error correction term
C40
url https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/21665095.2022.2146596
work_keys_str_mv AT margaretrutendomagwedere doespoliticalriskmatterforinfrastructureinvestmentsempiricalevidence
AT godfreymarozva doespoliticalriskmatterforinfrastructureinvestmentsempiricalevidence