Reoperation-requiring postoperative intracranial haemorrhage after posterior fossa craniotomy: Retrospective case-series

Introduction: Studies report rates of treatment-requiring postoperative intracranial haemorrhage after craniotomy around 1–2%, but do not distinguish between supratentorial and posterior fossa operations. Reports about intracranial haemorrhages’ temporal occurrence show conflicting results. Recommen...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Elise K. Kristensen, Kay Müller, Tor Ingebrigtsen, Haakon Lindekleiv, Roar Kloster, Jørgen G. Isaksen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2024-01-01
Series:Brain and Spine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772529423010299
_version_ 1797365604501422080
author Elise K. Kristensen
Kay Müller
Tor Ingebrigtsen
Haakon Lindekleiv
Roar Kloster
Jørgen G. Isaksen
author_facet Elise K. Kristensen
Kay Müller
Tor Ingebrigtsen
Haakon Lindekleiv
Roar Kloster
Jørgen G. Isaksen
author_sort Elise K. Kristensen
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: Studies report rates of treatment-requiring postoperative intracranial haemorrhage after craniotomy around 1–2%, but do not distinguish between supratentorial and posterior fossa operations. Reports about intracranial haemorrhages’ temporal occurrence show conflicting results. Recommendations for duration of postoperative monitoring vary. Research question: To determine the rate, temporal pattern and clinical presentation of reoperation-requiring postoperative intracranial posterior fossa haemorrhage. Material and methods: This retrospective case-series identified cases operated with posterior fossa craniotomy or craniectomy between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2021 by an electronic search in the patient administrative database, and collected data about patient- and treatment-characteristics, postoperative monitoring, and the occurrence of haemorrhagic and other serious postoperative complications. Results: We included 62 (n = 34, 55% women) cases with mean age 48 (interquartile range 50) years operated for tumours (n = 34, 55%), Chiari malformations (n = 18, 29%), ischemic stroke (n = 6, 10%) and other lesions (n = 3, 5%). One (2%) 66-year-old woman who was a daily smoker operated with decompressive craniectomy and infarct resection, developed a reoperation-requiring postoperative intracranial haemorrhage after 25.5 h. In four (6%) cases, other serious complications requiring reoperation or transfer from the post anaesthesia care unit or regular bed wards to the intensive care unit occurred after 0.5, 6, 9 and 54 h, respectively. Discussion and conclusion: Treatment-requiring postoperative intracranial haemorrhage and other serious complications after posterior fossa craniotomies occur over a wide timespan and are difficult to capture with a standardized postoperative monitoring time. This indicates that the duration of monitoring should be individualized based on assessment of risk factors.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T16:51:20Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b32357b9e12b477fafdaa60c84967468
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2772-5294
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T16:51:20Z
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Brain and Spine
spelling doaj.art-b32357b9e12b477fafdaa60c849674682024-01-05T04:25:24ZengElsevierBrain and Spine2772-52942024-01-014102741Reoperation-requiring postoperative intracranial haemorrhage after posterior fossa craniotomy: Retrospective case-seriesElise K. Kristensen0Kay Müller1Tor Ingebrigtsen2Haakon Lindekleiv3Roar Kloster4Jørgen G. Isaksen5Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT the Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, NorwayDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT the Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway; Department of Neurosurgery, Ophthalmology and Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, NorwayDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT the Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway; Department of Neurosurgery, Ophthalmology and Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway; Corresponding author. Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT the Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT the Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway; Department of Radiology, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, NorwayDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT the Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway; Department of Neurosurgery, Ophthalmology and Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, NorwayDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT the Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway; Department of Neurosurgery, Ophthalmology and Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, NorwayIntroduction: Studies report rates of treatment-requiring postoperative intracranial haemorrhage after craniotomy around 1–2%, but do not distinguish between supratentorial and posterior fossa operations. Reports about intracranial haemorrhages’ temporal occurrence show conflicting results. Recommendations for duration of postoperative monitoring vary. Research question: To determine the rate, temporal pattern and clinical presentation of reoperation-requiring postoperative intracranial posterior fossa haemorrhage. Material and methods: This retrospective case-series identified cases operated with posterior fossa craniotomy or craniectomy between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2021 by an electronic search in the patient administrative database, and collected data about patient- and treatment-characteristics, postoperative monitoring, and the occurrence of haemorrhagic and other serious postoperative complications. Results: We included 62 (n = 34, 55% women) cases with mean age 48 (interquartile range 50) years operated for tumours (n = 34, 55%), Chiari malformations (n = 18, 29%), ischemic stroke (n = 6, 10%) and other lesions (n = 3, 5%). One (2%) 66-year-old woman who was a daily smoker operated with decompressive craniectomy and infarct resection, developed a reoperation-requiring postoperative intracranial haemorrhage after 25.5 h. In four (6%) cases, other serious complications requiring reoperation or transfer from the post anaesthesia care unit or regular bed wards to the intensive care unit occurred after 0.5, 6, 9 and 54 h, respectively. Discussion and conclusion: Treatment-requiring postoperative intracranial haemorrhage and other serious complications after posterior fossa craniotomies occur over a wide timespan and are difficult to capture with a standardized postoperative monitoring time. This indicates that the duration of monitoring should be individualized based on assessment of risk factors.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772529423010299CraniotomyCraniectomyPosterior fossaPostoperative complicationsPostoperative haemorrhageMonitoring
spellingShingle Elise K. Kristensen
Kay Müller
Tor Ingebrigtsen
Haakon Lindekleiv
Roar Kloster
Jørgen G. Isaksen
Reoperation-requiring postoperative intracranial haemorrhage after posterior fossa craniotomy: Retrospective case-series
Brain and Spine
Craniotomy
Craniectomy
Posterior fossa
Postoperative complications
Postoperative haemorrhage
Monitoring
title Reoperation-requiring postoperative intracranial haemorrhage after posterior fossa craniotomy: Retrospective case-series
title_full Reoperation-requiring postoperative intracranial haemorrhage after posterior fossa craniotomy: Retrospective case-series
title_fullStr Reoperation-requiring postoperative intracranial haemorrhage after posterior fossa craniotomy: Retrospective case-series
title_full_unstemmed Reoperation-requiring postoperative intracranial haemorrhage after posterior fossa craniotomy: Retrospective case-series
title_short Reoperation-requiring postoperative intracranial haemorrhage after posterior fossa craniotomy: Retrospective case-series
title_sort reoperation requiring postoperative intracranial haemorrhage after posterior fossa craniotomy retrospective case series
topic Craniotomy
Craniectomy
Posterior fossa
Postoperative complications
Postoperative haemorrhage
Monitoring
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772529423010299
work_keys_str_mv AT elisekkristensen reoperationrequiringpostoperativeintracranialhaemorrhageafterposteriorfossacraniotomyretrospectivecaseseries
AT kaymuller reoperationrequiringpostoperativeintracranialhaemorrhageafterposteriorfossacraniotomyretrospectivecaseseries
AT toringebrigtsen reoperationrequiringpostoperativeintracranialhaemorrhageafterposteriorfossacraniotomyretrospectivecaseseries
AT haakonlindekleiv reoperationrequiringpostoperativeintracranialhaemorrhageafterposteriorfossacraniotomyretrospectivecaseseries
AT roarkloster reoperationrequiringpostoperativeintracranialhaemorrhageafterposteriorfossacraniotomyretrospectivecaseseries
AT jørgengisaksen reoperationrequiringpostoperativeintracranialhaemorrhageafterposteriorfossacraniotomyretrospectivecaseseries