The comparison of secondary caries between class I amalgam and class I composite restoration
Introducion: Secondary caries or recurrent caries is a lesion which is observed under or around the margins or surrounding walls of an existing restoration. Amalgam has been the restorative method of choice for many years due to its low cost, easy application, strength, durability, and bacteriostati...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Universitas Padjadjaran
2010-11-01
|
| Series: | Padjadjaran Journal of Dentistry |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://jurnal.unpad.ac.id/pjd/article/view/26893 |
| _version_ | 1818673084095266816 |
|---|---|
| author | Nur Hafizah Hanem Zubair Endang Sukartini Ayu Trisna Hayati |
| author_facet | Nur Hafizah Hanem Zubair Endang Sukartini Ayu Trisna Hayati |
| author_sort | Nur Hafizah Hanem Zubair |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Introducion: Secondary caries or recurrent caries is a lesion which is observed under or around the margins or surrounding walls of an existing restoration. Amalgam has been the restorative method of choice for many years due to its low cost, easy application, strength, durability, and bacteriostatic effects. he need for restorative materials that bear similarity with natural tooth tissue such as composite resins, has increased.The aim of this study is to comparison the occurrence of secondary caries on class I amalgam and class I composite restoration. Methods: The type of research was descriptive study in which 100 samples of each class I amalgam and class I composite from department of conservative dentistry, faculty of dentistry, Rumah Sakit Gigi dan Mulut were taken. The proportion of secondary caries in both amalgam and composite restorations was analysed. Results: The result showed that the proportion of secondary caries on amalgam was 0,38 and composite was 0,19, and then was analysed with two-sample z test. There were significant differences between proportions of secondary caries on class I amalgam and the proportion of secondary caries on class I composite restorations. Conclusion: There is a difference between the proportions of secondary caries on class I amalgam and class I composite restorations where the proportion is higher in amalgam restorations compared to composite. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-17T07:50:10Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-b3239a3830a44309a0a889222518707f |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1979-0201 2549-6212 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-17T07:50:10Z |
| publishDate | 2010-11-01 |
| publisher | Universitas Padjadjaran |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Padjadjaran Journal of Dentistry |
| spelling | doaj.art-b3239a3830a44309a0a889222518707f2022-12-21T21:57:53ZengUniversitas PadjadjaranPadjadjaran Journal of Dentistry1979-02012549-62122010-11-0122310.24198/pjd.vol22no3.2689312887The comparison of secondary caries between class I amalgam and class I composite restorationNur Hafizah Hanem Zubair0Endang Sukartini1Ayu Trisna Hayati2Universitas PadjadjaranUniversitas PadjadjaranUniversitas PadjadjaranIntroducion: Secondary caries or recurrent caries is a lesion which is observed under or around the margins or surrounding walls of an existing restoration. Amalgam has been the restorative method of choice for many years due to its low cost, easy application, strength, durability, and bacteriostatic effects. he need for restorative materials that bear similarity with natural tooth tissue such as composite resins, has increased.The aim of this study is to comparison the occurrence of secondary caries on class I amalgam and class I composite restoration. Methods: The type of research was descriptive study in which 100 samples of each class I amalgam and class I composite from department of conservative dentistry, faculty of dentistry, Rumah Sakit Gigi dan Mulut were taken. The proportion of secondary caries in both amalgam and composite restorations was analysed. Results: The result showed that the proportion of secondary caries on amalgam was 0,38 and composite was 0,19, and then was analysed with two-sample z test. There were significant differences between proportions of secondary caries on class I amalgam and the proportion of secondary caries on class I composite restorations. Conclusion: There is a difference between the proportions of secondary caries on class I amalgam and class I composite restorations where the proportion is higher in amalgam restorations compared to composite.http://jurnal.unpad.ac.id/pjd/article/view/26893class i, composite, amalgam, secondary caries. |
| spellingShingle | Nur Hafizah Hanem Zubair Endang Sukartini Ayu Trisna Hayati The comparison of secondary caries between class I amalgam and class I composite restoration Padjadjaran Journal of Dentistry class i, composite, amalgam, secondary caries. |
| title | The comparison of secondary caries between class I amalgam and class I composite restoration |
| title_full | The comparison of secondary caries between class I amalgam and class I composite restoration |
| title_fullStr | The comparison of secondary caries between class I amalgam and class I composite restoration |
| title_full_unstemmed | The comparison of secondary caries between class I amalgam and class I composite restoration |
| title_short | The comparison of secondary caries between class I amalgam and class I composite restoration |
| title_sort | comparison of secondary caries between class i amalgam and class i composite restoration |
| topic | class i, composite, amalgam, secondary caries. |
| url | http://jurnal.unpad.ac.id/pjd/article/view/26893 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT nurhafizahhanemzubair thecomparisonofsecondarycariesbetweenclassiamalgamandclassicompositerestoration AT endangsukartini thecomparisonofsecondarycariesbetweenclassiamalgamandclassicompositerestoration AT ayutrisnahayati thecomparisonofsecondarycariesbetweenclassiamalgamandclassicompositerestoration AT nurhafizahhanemzubair comparisonofsecondarycariesbetweenclassiamalgamandclassicompositerestoration AT endangsukartini comparisonofsecondarycariesbetweenclassiamalgamandclassicompositerestoration AT ayutrisnahayati comparisonofsecondarycariesbetweenclassiamalgamandclassicompositerestoration |