Reporting quality of clinical practice guidelines regarding gout and hyperuricemia according to the RIGHT checklist: systematic review
Abstract Background The Reporting Items for Practice Guidelines in Healthcare (RIGHT) checklist was used to assess the reporting quality of 2009–2019 clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) regarding gout and hyperuricemia, aimed to improve the reporting quality of future guidelines. Methods We searched...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMC
2021-04-01
|
| Series: | Systematic Reviews |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01645-1 |
| _version_ | 1819117944397889536 |
|---|---|
| author | Can Wang Xufei Luo Maichao Li Lingling Cui Xinde Li Lin Han Xuefeng Wang Wei Ren Yuwei He Wenyan Sun Changgui Li Yaolong Chen Zhen Liu |
| author_facet | Can Wang Xufei Luo Maichao Li Lingling Cui Xinde Li Lin Han Xuefeng Wang Wei Ren Yuwei He Wenyan Sun Changgui Li Yaolong Chen Zhen Liu |
| author_sort | Can Wang |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Background The Reporting Items for Practice Guidelines in Healthcare (RIGHT) checklist was used to assess the reporting quality of 2009–2019 clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) regarding gout and hyperuricemia, aimed to improve the reporting quality of future guidelines. Methods We searched PubMed, the Chinese Biomedical Literature database, the Wanfang Database, and the China National Knowledge Infrastructure from January 2009 to June 2019 for guidelines regarding gout and hyperuricemia. We also searched the websites of guideline development organizations (the Guidelines International Network, the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, the American College of Rheumatology, and the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR)). Furthermore, supplementary guidelines reported in included articles were systematically searched, as well as Google Scholar. Results Seventeen guidelines were included, of which one was in Chinese and 16 were in English. The mean reporting rate of the 35 items specified was 14.9 (42.5%); only five CPGs (29.4%) had a reporting rate >50%. Of the 35 items, three were very frequently reported. The reporting proportion of the seven domains (basic information, background, evidence, recommendations, review and quality assurance, funding and declaration and management of interests, and other information) were 64.7%, 36.8%, 50.6%, 42.9%, 8.82%, 33.8%, and 31.4%, respectively. Conclusion The reporting quality of the present guidelines for gout and hyperuricemia is relatively poor. We suggest that the RIGHT reporting checklist should be used by CPG developers to ensure higher reporting quality of future guidelines. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-22T05:41:02Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-b3240e36e0fc4d77a48803b908c49997 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2046-4053 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-22T05:41:02Z |
| publishDate | 2021-04-01 |
| publisher | BMC |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Systematic Reviews |
| spelling | doaj.art-b3240e36e0fc4d77a48803b908c499972022-12-21T18:37:11ZengBMCSystematic Reviews2046-40532021-04-0110111210.1186/s13643-021-01645-1Reporting quality of clinical practice guidelines regarding gout and hyperuricemia according to the RIGHT checklist: systematic reviewCan Wang0Xufei Luo1Maichao Li2Lingling Cui3Xinde Li4Lin Han5Xuefeng Wang6Wei Ren7Yuwei He8Wenyan Sun9Changgui Li10Yaolong Chen11Zhen Liu12Gout Laboratory, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao UniversitySchool of Public Health, Lanzhou UniversityGout Laboratory, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao UniversityGout Laboratory, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao UniversityGout Laboratory, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao UniversityGout Laboratory, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao UniversityGout Laboratory, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao UniversityGout Laboratory, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao UniversityGout Laboratory, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao UniversityInstitute of Metabolic Diseases, Qingdao UniversityGout Laboratory, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao UniversitySchool of Public Health, Lanzhou UniversityGout Laboratory, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao UniversityAbstract Background The Reporting Items for Practice Guidelines in Healthcare (RIGHT) checklist was used to assess the reporting quality of 2009–2019 clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) regarding gout and hyperuricemia, aimed to improve the reporting quality of future guidelines. Methods We searched PubMed, the Chinese Biomedical Literature database, the Wanfang Database, and the China National Knowledge Infrastructure from January 2009 to June 2019 for guidelines regarding gout and hyperuricemia. We also searched the websites of guideline development organizations (the Guidelines International Network, the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, the American College of Rheumatology, and the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR)). Furthermore, supplementary guidelines reported in included articles were systematically searched, as well as Google Scholar. Results Seventeen guidelines were included, of which one was in Chinese and 16 were in English. The mean reporting rate of the 35 items specified was 14.9 (42.5%); only five CPGs (29.4%) had a reporting rate >50%. Of the 35 items, three were very frequently reported. The reporting proportion of the seven domains (basic information, background, evidence, recommendations, review and quality assurance, funding and declaration and management of interests, and other information) were 64.7%, 36.8%, 50.6%, 42.9%, 8.82%, 33.8%, and 31.4%, respectively. Conclusion The reporting quality of the present guidelines for gout and hyperuricemia is relatively poor. We suggest that the RIGHT reporting checklist should be used by CPG developers to ensure higher reporting quality of future guidelines.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01645-1Clinical practice guidelineGoutHyperuricemiaRIGHT check listReporting quality |
| spellingShingle | Can Wang Xufei Luo Maichao Li Lingling Cui Xinde Li Lin Han Xuefeng Wang Wei Ren Yuwei He Wenyan Sun Changgui Li Yaolong Chen Zhen Liu Reporting quality of clinical practice guidelines regarding gout and hyperuricemia according to the RIGHT checklist: systematic review Systematic Reviews Clinical practice guideline Gout Hyperuricemia RIGHT check list Reporting quality |
| title | Reporting quality of clinical practice guidelines regarding gout and hyperuricemia according to the RIGHT checklist: systematic review |
| title_full | Reporting quality of clinical practice guidelines regarding gout and hyperuricemia according to the RIGHT checklist: systematic review |
| title_fullStr | Reporting quality of clinical practice guidelines regarding gout and hyperuricemia according to the RIGHT checklist: systematic review |
| title_full_unstemmed | Reporting quality of clinical practice guidelines regarding gout and hyperuricemia according to the RIGHT checklist: systematic review |
| title_short | Reporting quality of clinical practice guidelines regarding gout and hyperuricemia according to the RIGHT checklist: systematic review |
| title_sort | reporting quality of clinical practice guidelines regarding gout and hyperuricemia according to the right checklist systematic review |
| topic | Clinical practice guideline Gout Hyperuricemia RIGHT check list Reporting quality |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01645-1 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT canwang reportingqualityofclinicalpracticeguidelinesregardinggoutandhyperuricemiaaccordingtotherightchecklistsystematicreview AT xufeiluo reportingqualityofclinicalpracticeguidelinesregardinggoutandhyperuricemiaaccordingtotherightchecklistsystematicreview AT maichaoli reportingqualityofclinicalpracticeguidelinesregardinggoutandhyperuricemiaaccordingtotherightchecklistsystematicreview AT linglingcui reportingqualityofclinicalpracticeguidelinesregardinggoutandhyperuricemiaaccordingtotherightchecklistsystematicreview AT xindeli reportingqualityofclinicalpracticeguidelinesregardinggoutandhyperuricemiaaccordingtotherightchecklistsystematicreview AT linhan reportingqualityofclinicalpracticeguidelinesregardinggoutandhyperuricemiaaccordingtotherightchecklistsystematicreview AT xuefengwang reportingqualityofclinicalpracticeguidelinesregardinggoutandhyperuricemiaaccordingtotherightchecklistsystematicreview AT weiren reportingqualityofclinicalpracticeguidelinesregardinggoutandhyperuricemiaaccordingtotherightchecklistsystematicreview AT yuweihe reportingqualityofclinicalpracticeguidelinesregardinggoutandhyperuricemiaaccordingtotherightchecklistsystematicreview AT wenyansun reportingqualityofclinicalpracticeguidelinesregardinggoutandhyperuricemiaaccordingtotherightchecklistsystematicreview AT changguili reportingqualityofclinicalpracticeguidelinesregardinggoutandhyperuricemiaaccordingtotherightchecklistsystematicreview AT yaolongchen reportingqualityofclinicalpracticeguidelinesregardinggoutandhyperuricemiaaccordingtotherightchecklistsystematicreview AT zhenliu reportingqualityofclinicalpracticeguidelinesregardinggoutandhyperuricemiaaccordingtotherightchecklistsystematicreview |