Zwierzęta pozaludzkie jako podmioty polityki. Koncepcja zoopolis i jej krytyka
The interests of nonhuman animals within political philosophy have been and are still overlooked and underestimated. Recognition by modern science, and – increasingly – ethics, of the subjectivity and vulnerability of many animals does not extend to recognizing them as anything more than a secondary...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
University of Silesia Press
2016-12-01
|
| Series: | Zoophilologica |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.journals.us.edu.pl/index.php/ZOOPHILOLOGICA/article/view/6183 |
| _version_ | 1818741575800324096 |
|---|---|
| author | Dariusz Gzyra |
| author_facet | Dariusz Gzyra |
| author_sort | Dariusz Gzyra |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The interests of nonhuman animals within political philosophy have been and are still overlooked and underestimated. Recognition by modern science, and – increasingly – ethics, of the subjectivity and vulnerability of many animals does not extend to recognizing them as anything more than a secondary object of politics. In recent years, however, new concepts have emerged emphasizing the subjectivity and political agency of nonhuman animals. One of them is the concept of zoopolis by Sue Donaldson and Will Kymlicka. It postulates the use of political and legal categories that previously defined only men: citizenship, denizenship and sovereignty. Through citing earlier attempts at politicization of the animal detriment issue, the article presents the major hypothesis of the zoopolis concept and discusses some examples of its previous criticism. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-18T01:58:49Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-b328e238cb0d49f3bdc54e47a4b2edce |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2719-2687 2451-3849 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-18T01:58:49Z |
| publishDate | 2016-12-01 |
| publisher | University of Silesia Press |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Zoophilologica |
| spelling | doaj.art-b328e238cb0d49f3bdc54e47a4b2edce2022-12-21T21:24:49ZengUniversity of Silesia PressZoophilologica2719-26872451-38492016-12-0122532626183Zwierzęta pozaludzkie jako podmioty polityki. Koncepcja zoopolis i jej krytykaDariusz Gzyra0Uniwersytet Pedagogiczny im. KEN w KrakowieThe interests of nonhuman animals within political philosophy have been and are still overlooked and underestimated. Recognition by modern science, and – increasingly – ethics, of the subjectivity and vulnerability of many animals does not extend to recognizing them as anything more than a secondary object of politics. In recent years, however, new concepts have emerged emphasizing the subjectivity and political agency of nonhuman animals. One of them is the concept of zoopolis by Sue Donaldson and Will Kymlicka. It postulates the use of political and legal categories that previously defined only men: citizenship, denizenship and sovereignty. Through citing earlier attempts at politicization of the animal detriment issue, the article presents the major hypothesis of the zoopolis concept and discusses some examples of its previous criticism.https://www.journals.us.edu.pl/index.php/ZOOPHILOLOGICA/article/view/6183will kymlickapolitical philosophyanimal rightsagencydomestication |
| spellingShingle | Dariusz Gzyra Zwierzęta pozaludzkie jako podmioty polityki. Koncepcja zoopolis i jej krytyka Zoophilologica will kymlicka political philosophy animal rights agency domestication |
| title | Zwierzęta pozaludzkie jako podmioty polityki. Koncepcja zoopolis i jej krytyka |
| title_full | Zwierzęta pozaludzkie jako podmioty polityki. Koncepcja zoopolis i jej krytyka |
| title_fullStr | Zwierzęta pozaludzkie jako podmioty polityki. Koncepcja zoopolis i jej krytyka |
| title_full_unstemmed | Zwierzęta pozaludzkie jako podmioty polityki. Koncepcja zoopolis i jej krytyka |
| title_short | Zwierzęta pozaludzkie jako podmioty polityki. Koncepcja zoopolis i jej krytyka |
| title_sort | zwierzeta pozaludzkie jako podmioty polityki koncepcja zoopolis i jej krytyka |
| topic | will kymlicka political philosophy animal rights agency domestication |
| url | https://www.journals.us.edu.pl/index.php/ZOOPHILOLOGICA/article/view/6183 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT dariuszgzyra zwierzetapozaludzkiejakopodmiotypolitykikoncepcjazoopolisijejkrytyka |