Zwierzęta pozaludzkie jako podmioty polityki. Koncepcja zoopolis i jej krytyka
The interests of nonhuman animals within political philosophy have been and are still overlooked and underestimated. Recognition by modern science, and – increasingly – ethics, of the subjectivity and vulnerability of many animals does not extend to recognizing them as anything more than a secondary...
Main Author: | Dariusz Gzyra |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of Silesia Press
2016-12-01
|
Series: | Zoophilologica |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.journals.us.edu.pl/index.php/ZOOPHILOLOGICA/article/view/6183 |
Similar Items
-
The Subject of Minority Rights New Categories and a Critique of Will Kymlicka’s Group-Differentiated Rights
by: Dante Palma
Published: (2014-08-01) -
„Kolektywne” prawa człowieka źródłem ochrony mniejszości?
by: Georg Lohmann
Published: (2014-06-01) -
The legacy of liberalism, community and culture
by: Mitja Sardoč
Published: (2016-06-01) -
The liberal linguistic turn: kymlicka’s freedom account revisited
by: Helder De Schutter
Published: (2016-01-01) -
AÇÃO AFIRMATIVA NO BRASIL: MULTICULTURALISMO OU JUSTIÇA SOCIAL?
by: João Feres Júnior, et al.
Published: (2016-12-01)