Bone structure determined by HR-MDCT does not correlate with micro-CT of lumbar vertebral biopsies: a prospective cross-sectional human in vivo study

Abstract Background Osteoporosis is characterized by a deterioration of bone structure and quantity that leads to an increased risk of fractures. The primary diagnostic tool for the assessment of the bone quality is currently the dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), which however only measures bo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Matthias Pumberger, Ahi Sema Issever, Torsten Diekhoff, Christin Schwemmer, Susanne Berg, Yannick Palmowski, Michael Putzier
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-09-01
Series:Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13018-020-01895-0
_version_ 1828109497064751104
author Matthias Pumberger
Ahi Sema Issever
Torsten Diekhoff
Christin Schwemmer
Susanne Berg
Yannick Palmowski
Michael Putzier
author_facet Matthias Pumberger
Ahi Sema Issever
Torsten Diekhoff
Christin Schwemmer
Susanne Berg
Yannick Palmowski
Michael Putzier
author_sort Matthias Pumberger
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Osteoporosis is characterized by a deterioration of bone structure and quantity that leads to an increased risk of fractures. The primary diagnostic tool for the assessment of the bone quality is currently the dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), which however only measures bone quantity. High-resolution multidetector computed tomography (HR-MDCT) offers an alternative approach to assess bone structure, but still lacks evidence for its validity in vivo. The objective of this study was to assess the validity of HR-MDCT for the evaluation of bone architecture in the lumbar spine. Methods We conducted a prospective cross-sectional study to compare the results of preoperative lumbar HR-MDCT scans with those from microcomputed tomography (μCT) analysis of transpedicular vertebral body biopsies. For this purpose, we included patients undergoing spinal surgery in our orthopedic department. Each patient underwent preoperative HR-MDCT scanning (L1-L4). Intraoperatively, transpedicular biopsies were obtained from intact vertebrae. Micro-CT analysis of these biopsies was used as a reference method to assess the actual bone architecture. HR-MDCT results were statistically analyzed regarding the correlation with results from μCT. Results Thirty-four patients with a mean age of 69.09 years (± 10.07) were included in the study. There was no significant correlation for any of the parameters (bone volume/total volume, trabecular separation, trabecular thickness) between μCT and HR-MDCT (bone volume/total volume: r = − 0.026 and p = 0.872; trabecular thickness: r = 0.074 and r = 6.42; and trabecular separation: r = − 0.18 and p = 0.254). Conclusion To our knowledge, this is the first study comparing in vivo HR-MDCT with μCT analysis of vertebral biopsies in human patients. Our findings suggest that lumbar HR-MDCT is not valid for the in vivo evaluation of bone architecture in the lumbar spine. New diagnostic tools for the evaluation of osteoporosis and preoperative orthopedic planning are urgently needed.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T11:04:20Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b33fec0d4f924d2fb22dcf4ab8476e15
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1749-799X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T11:04:20Z
publishDate 2020-09-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
spelling doaj.art-b33fec0d4f924d2fb22dcf4ab8476e152022-12-22T04:28:26ZengBMCJournal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research1749-799X2020-09-011511710.1186/s13018-020-01895-0Bone structure determined by HR-MDCT does not correlate with micro-CT of lumbar vertebral biopsies: a prospective cross-sectional human in vivo studyMatthias Pumberger0Ahi Sema Issever1Torsten Diekhoff2Christin Schwemmer3Susanne Berg4Yannick Palmowski5Michael Putzier6Spine Department, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité University Medicine BerlinDepartment of Radiology, Charité University Medicine BerlinDepartment of Radiology, Charité University Medicine BerlinCharité University Medicine BerlinCharité University Medicine BerlinSpine Department, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité University Medicine BerlinSpine Department, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité University Medicine BerlinAbstract Background Osteoporosis is characterized by a deterioration of bone structure and quantity that leads to an increased risk of fractures. The primary diagnostic tool for the assessment of the bone quality is currently the dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), which however only measures bone quantity. High-resolution multidetector computed tomography (HR-MDCT) offers an alternative approach to assess bone structure, but still lacks evidence for its validity in vivo. The objective of this study was to assess the validity of HR-MDCT for the evaluation of bone architecture in the lumbar spine. Methods We conducted a prospective cross-sectional study to compare the results of preoperative lumbar HR-MDCT scans with those from microcomputed tomography (μCT) analysis of transpedicular vertebral body biopsies. For this purpose, we included patients undergoing spinal surgery in our orthopedic department. Each patient underwent preoperative HR-MDCT scanning (L1-L4). Intraoperatively, transpedicular biopsies were obtained from intact vertebrae. Micro-CT analysis of these biopsies was used as a reference method to assess the actual bone architecture. HR-MDCT results were statistically analyzed regarding the correlation with results from μCT. Results Thirty-four patients with a mean age of 69.09 years (± 10.07) were included in the study. There was no significant correlation for any of the parameters (bone volume/total volume, trabecular separation, trabecular thickness) between μCT and HR-MDCT (bone volume/total volume: r = − 0.026 and p = 0.872; trabecular thickness: r = 0.074 and r = 6.42; and trabecular separation: r = − 0.18 and p = 0.254). Conclusion To our knowledge, this is the first study comparing in vivo HR-MDCT with μCT analysis of vertebral biopsies in human patients. Our findings suggest that lumbar HR-MDCT is not valid for the in vivo evaluation of bone architecture in the lumbar spine. New diagnostic tools for the evaluation of osteoporosis and preoperative orthopedic planning are urgently needed.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13018-020-01895-0SpineVertebral biopsiesMDCTMicro-CTOsteoporosis
spellingShingle Matthias Pumberger
Ahi Sema Issever
Torsten Diekhoff
Christin Schwemmer
Susanne Berg
Yannick Palmowski
Michael Putzier
Bone structure determined by HR-MDCT does not correlate with micro-CT of lumbar vertebral biopsies: a prospective cross-sectional human in vivo study
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Spine
Vertebral biopsies
MDCT
Micro-CT
Osteoporosis
title Bone structure determined by HR-MDCT does not correlate with micro-CT of lumbar vertebral biopsies: a prospective cross-sectional human in vivo study
title_full Bone structure determined by HR-MDCT does not correlate with micro-CT of lumbar vertebral biopsies: a prospective cross-sectional human in vivo study
title_fullStr Bone structure determined by HR-MDCT does not correlate with micro-CT of lumbar vertebral biopsies: a prospective cross-sectional human in vivo study
title_full_unstemmed Bone structure determined by HR-MDCT does not correlate with micro-CT of lumbar vertebral biopsies: a prospective cross-sectional human in vivo study
title_short Bone structure determined by HR-MDCT does not correlate with micro-CT of lumbar vertebral biopsies: a prospective cross-sectional human in vivo study
title_sort bone structure determined by hr mdct does not correlate with micro ct of lumbar vertebral biopsies a prospective cross sectional human in vivo study
topic Spine
Vertebral biopsies
MDCT
Micro-CT
Osteoporosis
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13018-020-01895-0
work_keys_str_mv AT matthiaspumberger bonestructuredeterminedbyhrmdctdoesnotcorrelatewithmicroctoflumbarvertebralbiopsiesaprospectivecrosssectionalhumaninvivostudy
AT ahisemaissever bonestructuredeterminedbyhrmdctdoesnotcorrelatewithmicroctoflumbarvertebralbiopsiesaprospectivecrosssectionalhumaninvivostudy
AT torstendiekhoff bonestructuredeterminedbyhrmdctdoesnotcorrelatewithmicroctoflumbarvertebralbiopsiesaprospectivecrosssectionalhumaninvivostudy
AT christinschwemmer bonestructuredeterminedbyhrmdctdoesnotcorrelatewithmicroctoflumbarvertebralbiopsiesaprospectivecrosssectionalhumaninvivostudy
AT susanneberg bonestructuredeterminedbyhrmdctdoesnotcorrelatewithmicroctoflumbarvertebralbiopsiesaprospectivecrosssectionalhumaninvivostudy
AT yannickpalmowski bonestructuredeterminedbyhrmdctdoesnotcorrelatewithmicroctoflumbarvertebralbiopsiesaprospectivecrosssectionalhumaninvivostudy
AT michaelputzier bonestructuredeterminedbyhrmdctdoesnotcorrelatewithmicroctoflumbarvertebralbiopsiesaprospectivecrosssectionalhumaninvivostudy