Soil fauna communities and microbial activities response to litter and soil properties under degraded and restored forests of Hyrcania

Reforestation has long been the best practice to restore degraded forests due to human interventions. In this paper we investigated the effect of forest degradation (DNF) along with reforestation using 4 endemic species (Alnus subcordata, ASP; Acer velutinum, AVP; Cupressus sempervirens, CSP; Quercu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bazyari M, Etemad V, Kooch Y, Shirvany A
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Italian Society of Silviculture and Forest Ecology (SISEF) 2021-12-01
Series:iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry
Subjects:
Online Access:https://iforest.sisef.org/contents/?id=ifor3583-014
_version_ 1818825856078839808
author Bazyari M
Etemad V
Kooch Y
Shirvany A
author_facet Bazyari M
Etemad V
Kooch Y
Shirvany A
author_sort Bazyari M
collection DOAJ
description Reforestation has long been the best practice to restore degraded forests due to human interventions. In this paper we investigated the effect of forest degradation (DNF) along with reforestation using 4 endemic species (Alnus subcordata, ASP; Acer velutinum, AVP; Cupressus sempervirens, CSP; Quercus castaneifolia Mey, QCP) on forest’s soil chemical and biological indicators compared to a close-to-virgin natural forest (VNF). For this study, a total of 24 physico-chemical and 25 biological and microbial indicators were measured in soils of all 6 forest stands along with the litter properties. Results showed that the lowest soil quality was observed under DNF, CSP, and QCP which was the result of forest cover degradation in DNF and low litter quality, especially low pH and high C:N, in CSP and QCP. Soil fauna communities were significantly affected by tree species. We found two times higher density of earthworms in VNF compared to ASP, but in DNF the density was 5 times lower than VNF. We found no epigeic earthworms in QCP, CSP and DNF and no endogeic earthworms in DNF. Acarina and Collembola density was high in VNF and ASP, but they showed significant differences (VNF>ASP), and their density sharply decreased in other stands, especially in CSP (3 times lower than VNF) and DNF (8 to 10 times lower than VNF). Nematode density was statistically equal in VNF, ASP, and AVP, but significantly lower in other stands. Protozoa, bacteria and fungi densities were significantly higher in VNF and ASP (VNF>ASP) compared to each other and other forest stands. Basal respiration, substrate induced respiration, microbial biomass N and P, and carbon availability index was also higher in VNF and ASP compared to other stands. Although VNF has the best condition because of old forest cover and high diversity, ASP soil showed significant improvements, demonstrating the importance of litter quality in soil restoration. Restoration effectiveness ranking of the four tested species on soil improvement are therefore ASP>AVP>QCP>CSP. The significant improvement of soil quality under ASP compared to other reforestated stands, only after 3 decades, emphasizes the importance of tree species selection and litter quality on soil chemical and biological restoration.
first_indexed 2024-12-19T00:18:24Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b3430ebdc63d424492f9a6ec3126bdd1
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1971-7458
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T00:18:24Z
publishDate 2021-12-01
publisher Italian Society of Silviculture and Forest Ecology (SISEF)
record_format Article
series iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry
spelling doaj.art-b3430ebdc63d424492f9a6ec3126bdd12022-12-21T20:45:41ZengItalian Society of Silviculture and Forest Ecology (SISEF)iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry1971-74582021-12-0114149049810.3832/ifor3583-0143583Soil fauna communities and microbial activities response to litter and soil properties under degraded and restored forests of HyrcaniaBazyari M0Etemad V1Kooch Y2Shirvany A3Department of Forestry and Forest Economy, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Tehran - IranFaculty of Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Alborz - IranFaculty of Natural Resources & Marine Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, 46417-76489, Noor, Mazandaran - IranFaculty of Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Alborz - IranReforestation has long been the best practice to restore degraded forests due to human interventions. In this paper we investigated the effect of forest degradation (DNF) along with reforestation using 4 endemic species (Alnus subcordata, ASP; Acer velutinum, AVP; Cupressus sempervirens, CSP; Quercus castaneifolia Mey, QCP) on forest’s soil chemical and biological indicators compared to a close-to-virgin natural forest (VNF). For this study, a total of 24 physico-chemical and 25 biological and microbial indicators were measured in soils of all 6 forest stands along with the litter properties. Results showed that the lowest soil quality was observed under DNF, CSP, and QCP which was the result of forest cover degradation in DNF and low litter quality, especially low pH and high C:N, in CSP and QCP. Soil fauna communities were significantly affected by tree species. We found two times higher density of earthworms in VNF compared to ASP, but in DNF the density was 5 times lower than VNF. We found no epigeic earthworms in QCP, CSP and DNF and no endogeic earthworms in DNF. Acarina and Collembola density was high in VNF and ASP, but they showed significant differences (VNF>ASP), and their density sharply decreased in other stands, especially in CSP (3 times lower than VNF) and DNF (8 to 10 times lower than VNF). Nematode density was statistically equal in VNF, ASP, and AVP, but significantly lower in other stands. Protozoa, bacteria and fungi densities were significantly higher in VNF and ASP (VNF>ASP) compared to each other and other forest stands. Basal respiration, substrate induced respiration, microbial biomass N and P, and carbon availability index was also higher in VNF and ASP compared to other stands. Although VNF has the best condition because of old forest cover and high diversity, ASP soil showed significant improvements, demonstrating the importance of litter quality in soil restoration. Restoration effectiveness ranking of the four tested species on soil improvement are therefore ASP>AVP>QCP>CSP. The significant improvement of soil quality under ASP compared to other reforestated stands, only after 3 decades, emphasizes the importance of tree species selection and litter quality on soil chemical and biological restoration.https://iforest.sisef.org/contents/?id=ifor3583-014Forest RestorationReforestationLitter QualitySoil Biological ActivitySoil Chemical PropertiesSoil Fauna
spellingShingle Bazyari M
Etemad V
Kooch Y
Shirvany A
Soil fauna communities and microbial activities response to litter and soil properties under degraded and restored forests of Hyrcania
iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry
Forest Restoration
Reforestation
Litter Quality
Soil Biological Activity
Soil Chemical Properties
Soil Fauna
title Soil fauna communities and microbial activities response to litter and soil properties under degraded and restored forests of Hyrcania
title_full Soil fauna communities and microbial activities response to litter and soil properties under degraded and restored forests of Hyrcania
title_fullStr Soil fauna communities and microbial activities response to litter and soil properties under degraded and restored forests of Hyrcania
title_full_unstemmed Soil fauna communities and microbial activities response to litter and soil properties under degraded and restored forests of Hyrcania
title_short Soil fauna communities and microbial activities response to litter and soil properties under degraded and restored forests of Hyrcania
title_sort soil fauna communities and microbial activities response to litter and soil properties under degraded and restored forests of hyrcania
topic Forest Restoration
Reforestation
Litter Quality
Soil Biological Activity
Soil Chemical Properties
Soil Fauna
url https://iforest.sisef.org/contents/?id=ifor3583-014
work_keys_str_mv AT bazyarim soilfaunacommunitiesandmicrobialactivitiesresponsetolitterandsoilpropertiesunderdegradedandrestoredforestsofhyrcania
AT etemadv soilfaunacommunitiesandmicrobialactivitiesresponsetolitterandsoilpropertiesunderdegradedandrestoredforestsofhyrcania
AT koochy soilfaunacommunitiesandmicrobialactivitiesresponsetolitterandsoilpropertiesunderdegradedandrestoredforestsofhyrcania
AT shirvanya soilfaunacommunitiesandmicrobialactivitiesresponsetolitterandsoilpropertiesunderdegradedandrestoredforestsofhyrcania