Reference ventricular dimensions and function parameters by cardiovascular magnetic resonance in highly trained Caucasian athletes

Abstract Background Data regarding cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) reference values in athletes have not been well determined yet. Using CMR normal reference values derived from the general population may be misleading in athletes and may have clinical implications. Aims To determine referen...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alicia M. Maceira, Jose V. Monmeneu, M. Pilar López, M. Pilar García, Laura Higueras, M. Dolores Masiá, Araceli Boraita
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2023-02-01
Series:Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12968-023-00910-7
Description
Summary:Abstract Background Data regarding cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) reference values in athletes have not been well determined yet. Using CMR normal reference values derived from the general population may be misleading in athletes and may have clinical implications. Aims To determine reference ventricular dimensions and function parameters and ratios by CMR in high performance athletes. Methods Elite athletes and age‐ and gender‐matched sedentary healthy controls were included. Anatomical and functional variables, including biventricular volumes, mass, systolic function, wall thickness, sphericity index and longitudinal function were determined by CMR. Results A total of 148 athletes (29.2 ± 9.1 years; 64.8% men) and 124 controls (32.1 ± 10.5 years; 67.7% men) were included. Left ventricular (LV) mass excluding papillary muscles was 67 ± 13 g/m2 in the control group and increased from 65 ± 14 g/m2 in the low intensity sport category to 83 ± 16 g/m2 in the high cardiovascular demand sport category; P < 0.001. Regarding right ventricular (RV) mass, the data were 20 ± 5, 31 ± 6, and 38 ± 8 g/m2, respectively; P < 0.001. LV and RV volumes, and wall thickness were higher in athletes than in the control group, and also increased with sport category. However, LV and RV ejection fractions were similar in both groups. LV and RV dimensions, wall thickness and LV/RV ratios reference parameters for athletes are provided. Conclusions LV and RV masses, volumes, and wall thicknesses are higher in athletes than in sedentary subjects. Specific CMR reference ranges for athletes are provided and can be used as reference levels, rather than the standard upper limits used for the general population to exclude cardiomyopathy.
ISSN:1532-429X