Scholarly Communication Librarians’ Relationship with Research Impact Indicators: An Analysis of a National Survey of Academic Librarians in the United States
INTRODUCTION Academic librarians, especially in the field of scholarly communication, are often expected to understand and engage with research impact indicators. However, much of the current literature speculates about how academic librarians are using and implementing research impact indicators in...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Iowa State University Digital Press
2018-07-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.iastatedigitalpress.com/jlsc/article/id/12810/ |
| _version_ | 1827292993611104256 |
|---|---|
| author | Rachel Ann Miles Sarah Sutton Stacy Konkiel |
| author_facet | Rachel Ann Miles Sarah Sutton Stacy Konkiel |
| author_sort | Rachel Ann Miles |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | INTRODUCTION Academic librarians, especially in the field of scholarly communication, are often expected to understand and engage with research impact indicators. However, much of the current literature speculates about how academic librarians are using and implementing research impact indicators in their practice. METHODS This study analyzed the results from a 2015 survey administered to over 13,000 academic librarians at Carnegie-classified R1 institutions in the United States. The survey concentrated on academic librarians’ familiarity with and usage of research impact indicators. Results: This study uncovered findings related to academic librarians’ various levels of familiarity with research impact indicators and how they implement and use research impact indicators in their professional development and in their library job duties. DISCUSSION In general, academic librarians with regular scholarly communication support duties tend to have higher levels of familiarity of research impact indicators. In general, academic librarians are most familiar with the citation counts and usage statistics and least familiar with altmetrics. During consultations with faculty, the Journal Impact Factor (JIF) and citation counts are more likely to be addressed than the author h-index, altmetrics, qualitative measures, and expert peer reviews. The survey results also hint towards a growing interest in altmetrics among academic librarians for their professional advancement. CONCLUSION Academic librarians are continually challenged to keep pace with the changing landscape of research impact metrics and research assessment models. By keeping pace and implementing research impact indicators in their own practices, academic librarians can provide a crucial service to the wider academic community. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-24T13:16:22Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-b35d6864cc464ecfb73a258b8753aec1 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2162-3309 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-24T13:16:22Z |
| publishDate | 2018-07-01 |
| publisher | Iowa State University Digital Press |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication |
| spelling | doaj.art-b35d6864cc464ecfb73a258b8753aec12024-04-04T17:33:11ZengIowa State University Digital PressJournal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication2162-33092018-07-016110.7710/2162-3309.2212Scholarly Communication Librarians’ Relationship with Research Impact Indicators: An Analysis of a National Survey of Academic Librarians in the United StatesRachel Ann Miles0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8834-4304Sarah Sutton1https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5216-3432Stacy Konkiel2Kansas State UniversityEmporia State University Emporia KS INTRODUCTION Academic librarians, especially in the field of scholarly communication, are often expected to understand and engage with research impact indicators. However, much of the current literature speculates about how academic librarians are using and implementing research impact indicators in their practice. METHODS This study analyzed the results from a 2015 survey administered to over 13,000 academic librarians at Carnegie-classified R1 institutions in the United States. The survey concentrated on academic librarians’ familiarity with and usage of research impact indicators. Results: This study uncovered findings related to academic librarians’ various levels of familiarity with research impact indicators and how they implement and use research impact indicators in their professional development and in their library job duties. DISCUSSION In general, academic librarians with regular scholarly communication support duties tend to have higher levels of familiarity of research impact indicators. In general, academic librarians are most familiar with the citation counts and usage statistics and least familiar with altmetrics. During consultations with faculty, the Journal Impact Factor (JIF) and citation counts are more likely to be addressed than the author h-index, altmetrics, qualitative measures, and expert peer reviews. The survey results also hint towards a growing interest in altmetrics among academic librarians for their professional advancement. CONCLUSION Academic librarians are continually challenged to keep pace with the changing landscape of research impact metrics and research assessment models. By keeping pace and implementing research impact indicators in their own practices, academic librarians can provide a crucial service to the wider academic community.https://www.iastatedigitalpress.com/jlsc/article/id/12810/bibliometricsaltmetricsresearch impact metricssurvey researchusage datascholarly communication |
| spellingShingle | Rachel Ann Miles Sarah Sutton Stacy Konkiel Scholarly Communication Librarians’ Relationship with Research Impact Indicators: An Analysis of a National Survey of Academic Librarians in the United States Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication bibliometrics altmetrics research impact metrics survey research usage data scholarly communication |
| title | Scholarly Communication Librarians’ Relationship with Research Impact Indicators: An Analysis of a National Survey of Academic Librarians in the United States |
| title_full | Scholarly Communication Librarians’ Relationship with Research Impact Indicators: An Analysis of a National Survey of Academic Librarians in the United States |
| title_fullStr | Scholarly Communication Librarians’ Relationship with Research Impact Indicators: An Analysis of a National Survey of Academic Librarians in the United States |
| title_full_unstemmed | Scholarly Communication Librarians’ Relationship with Research Impact Indicators: An Analysis of a National Survey of Academic Librarians in the United States |
| title_short | Scholarly Communication Librarians’ Relationship with Research Impact Indicators: An Analysis of a National Survey of Academic Librarians in the United States |
| title_sort | scholarly communication librarians relationship with research impact indicators an analysis of a national survey of academic librarians in the united states |
| topic | bibliometrics altmetrics research impact metrics survey research usage data scholarly communication |
| url | https://www.iastatedigitalpress.com/jlsc/article/id/12810/ |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT rachelannmiles scholarlycommunicationlibrariansrelationshipwithresearchimpactindicatorsananalysisofanationalsurveyofacademiclibrariansintheunitedstates AT sarahsutton scholarlycommunicationlibrariansrelationshipwithresearchimpactindicatorsananalysisofanationalsurveyofacademiclibrariansintheunitedstates AT stacykonkiel scholarlycommunicationlibrariansrelationshipwithresearchimpactindicatorsananalysisofanationalsurveyofacademiclibrariansintheunitedstates |