A Haptic Sleeve as a Method of Mechanotactile Feedback Restoration for Myoelectric Hand Prosthesis Users

Current myoelectric upper limb prostheses do not restore sensory feedback, impairing fine motor control. Mechanotactile feedback restoration with a haptic sleeve may rectify this problem. This randomised crossover within-participant controlled study aimed to assess a prototype haptic sleeve's e...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Violet R. Borkowska, Alistair McConnell, Sethu Vijayakumar, Adam Stokes, Aidan D. Roche
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-04-01
Series:Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fresc.2022.806479/full
_version_ 1828074878535729152
author Violet R. Borkowska
Alistair McConnell
Sethu Vijayakumar
Adam Stokes
Aidan D. Roche
Aidan D. Roche
author_facet Violet R. Borkowska
Alistair McConnell
Sethu Vijayakumar
Adam Stokes
Aidan D. Roche
Aidan D. Roche
author_sort Violet R. Borkowska
collection DOAJ
description Current myoelectric upper limb prostheses do not restore sensory feedback, impairing fine motor control. Mechanotactile feedback restoration with a haptic sleeve may rectify this problem. This randomised crossover within-participant controlled study aimed to assess a prototype haptic sleeve's effect on routine grasping tasks performed by eight able-bodied participants. Each participant completed 15 repetitions of the three tasks: Task 1—normal grasp, Task 2—strong grasp and Task 3—weak grasp, using visual, haptic, or combined feedback All data were collected in April 2021 in the Scottish Microelectronics Centre, Edinburgh, UK. Combined feedback correlated with significantly higher grasp success rates compared to the vision alone in Task 1 (p < 0.0001), Task 2 (p = 0.0057), and Task 3 (p = 0.0170). Similarly, haptic feedback was associated with significantly higher grasp success rates compared to vision in Task 1 (p < 0.0001) and Task 2 (p = 0.0015). Combined feedback correlated with significantly lower energy expenditure compared to visual feedback in Task 1 (p < 0.0001) and Task 3 (p = 0.0003). Likewise, haptic feedback was associated with significantly lower energy expenditure compared to the visual feedback in Task 1 (p < 0.0001), Task 2 (p < 0.0001), and Task 3 (p < 0.0001). These results suggest that mechanotactile feedback provided by the haptic sleeve effectively augments grasping and reduces its energy expenditure.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T01:50:11Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b36666f4c1424164bd9fe188dbbe69fe
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2673-6861
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T01:50:11Z
publishDate 2022-04-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences
spelling doaj.art-b36666f4c1424164bd9fe188dbbe69fe2023-01-03T06:42:24ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences2673-68612022-04-01310.3389/fresc.2022.806479806479A Haptic Sleeve as a Method of Mechanotactile Feedback Restoration for Myoelectric Hand Prosthesis UsersViolet R. Borkowska0Alistair McConnell1Sethu Vijayakumar2Adam Stokes3Aidan D. Roche4Aidan D. Roche5Edinburgh Medical School, College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United KingdomScottish Microelectronics Centre, Institute for Integrated Micro and Nano Systems, School of Engineering, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United KingdomSchool of Informatics, Bayes Centre, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United KingdomScottish Microelectronics Centre, Institute for Integrated Micro and Nano Systems, School of Engineering, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United KingdomCollege of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, The Queen's Medical Research Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United KingdomDepartment of Plastic Surgery, National Healthcare System Lothian, Edinburgh, United KingdomCurrent myoelectric upper limb prostheses do not restore sensory feedback, impairing fine motor control. Mechanotactile feedback restoration with a haptic sleeve may rectify this problem. This randomised crossover within-participant controlled study aimed to assess a prototype haptic sleeve's effect on routine grasping tasks performed by eight able-bodied participants. Each participant completed 15 repetitions of the three tasks: Task 1—normal grasp, Task 2—strong grasp and Task 3—weak grasp, using visual, haptic, or combined feedback All data were collected in April 2021 in the Scottish Microelectronics Centre, Edinburgh, UK. Combined feedback correlated with significantly higher grasp success rates compared to the vision alone in Task 1 (p < 0.0001), Task 2 (p = 0.0057), and Task 3 (p = 0.0170). Similarly, haptic feedback was associated with significantly higher grasp success rates compared to vision in Task 1 (p < 0.0001) and Task 2 (p = 0.0015). Combined feedback correlated with significantly lower energy expenditure compared to visual feedback in Task 1 (p < 0.0001) and Task 3 (p = 0.0003). Likewise, haptic feedback was associated with significantly lower energy expenditure compared to the visual feedback in Task 1 (p < 0.0001), Task 2 (p < 0.0001), and Task 3 (p < 0.0001). These results suggest that mechanotactile feedback provided by the haptic sleeve effectively augments grasping and reduces its energy expenditure.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fresc.2022.806479/fullhapticmechanotactilesensory feedbacksensory restorationprostheticprosthesis
spellingShingle Violet R. Borkowska
Alistair McConnell
Sethu Vijayakumar
Adam Stokes
Aidan D. Roche
Aidan D. Roche
A Haptic Sleeve as a Method of Mechanotactile Feedback Restoration for Myoelectric Hand Prosthesis Users
Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences
haptic
mechanotactile
sensory feedback
sensory restoration
prosthetic
prosthesis
title A Haptic Sleeve as a Method of Mechanotactile Feedback Restoration for Myoelectric Hand Prosthesis Users
title_full A Haptic Sleeve as a Method of Mechanotactile Feedback Restoration for Myoelectric Hand Prosthesis Users
title_fullStr A Haptic Sleeve as a Method of Mechanotactile Feedback Restoration for Myoelectric Hand Prosthesis Users
title_full_unstemmed A Haptic Sleeve as a Method of Mechanotactile Feedback Restoration for Myoelectric Hand Prosthesis Users
title_short A Haptic Sleeve as a Method of Mechanotactile Feedback Restoration for Myoelectric Hand Prosthesis Users
title_sort haptic sleeve as a method of mechanotactile feedback restoration for myoelectric hand prosthesis users
topic haptic
mechanotactile
sensory feedback
sensory restoration
prosthetic
prosthesis
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fresc.2022.806479/full
work_keys_str_mv AT violetrborkowska ahapticsleeveasamethodofmechanotactilefeedbackrestorationformyoelectrichandprosthesisusers
AT alistairmcconnell ahapticsleeveasamethodofmechanotactilefeedbackrestorationformyoelectrichandprosthesisusers
AT sethuvijayakumar ahapticsleeveasamethodofmechanotactilefeedbackrestorationformyoelectrichandprosthesisusers
AT adamstokes ahapticsleeveasamethodofmechanotactilefeedbackrestorationformyoelectrichandprosthesisusers
AT aidandroche ahapticsleeveasamethodofmechanotactilefeedbackrestorationformyoelectrichandprosthesisusers
AT aidandroche ahapticsleeveasamethodofmechanotactilefeedbackrestorationformyoelectrichandprosthesisusers
AT violetrborkowska hapticsleeveasamethodofmechanotactilefeedbackrestorationformyoelectrichandprosthesisusers
AT alistairmcconnell hapticsleeveasamethodofmechanotactilefeedbackrestorationformyoelectrichandprosthesisusers
AT sethuvijayakumar hapticsleeveasamethodofmechanotactilefeedbackrestorationformyoelectrichandprosthesisusers
AT adamstokes hapticsleeveasamethodofmechanotactilefeedbackrestorationformyoelectrichandprosthesisusers
AT aidandroche hapticsleeveasamethodofmechanotactilefeedbackrestorationformyoelectrichandprosthesisusers
AT aidandroche hapticsleeveasamethodofmechanotactilefeedbackrestorationformyoelectrichandprosthesisusers