To RCT or not to RCT: evidence on effectiveness of return-to-work interventions
The randomized controlled trial (RCT) is considered the gold standard in evaluative medical research for drawing causal inferences about the effects of the intervention under study. For several reasons, in occupational health research, an RCT is neither always the best study design nor the most feas...
Main Authors: | Alex Burdorf, Allard J van der Beek |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Nordic Association of Occupational Safety and Health (NOROSH)
2016-07-01
|
Series: | Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: |
https://www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?abstract_id=3577
|
Similar Items
-
What promotes sustained return to work of employees on long-term sick leave? Perspectives of vocational rehabilitation professionals
by: Patricia M Dekkers-Sánchez, et al.
Published: (2011-11-01) -
The development of a return to work intervention programme for stroke survivor (SReTWIP): a Delphi survey
by: Olumide Ayoola Olaoye, et al.
Published: (2020-03-01) -
How should methods for return to work be evaluated?
by: Bengt Järvholm
Published: (2012-03-01) -
Developing and Implementing ICF-Based Tools for Occupational Rehabilitation Supporting the Communication and Return to Work Process Between Sickness Absentees, Clinical Team and Jobcentre Contacts
by: Thomas Johansen, et al.
Published: (2022-07-01) -
Work Disability and Return to Work After Lymphoma: A Danish Nationwide Cohort Study
by: Maksten EF, et al.
Published: (2023-03-01)