Student Protests. Three Periods of University Governance
Exploring the idea of student protests as an autonomous object of research and discussion, this paper leads to the understanding that the transforming role of the university and its governance defines the possibilities for the political role of students. In this perspective, there is a particular co...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Paderborn University: Media Systems and Media Organisation Research Group
2017-05-01
|
Series: | tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.triple-c.at/index.php/tripleC/article/view/771 |
_version_ | 1797709155583131648 |
---|---|
author | Joan Ramon Rodriguez-Amat Bob Jeffery |
author_facet | Joan Ramon Rodriguez-Amat Bob Jeffery |
author_sort | Joan Ramon Rodriguez-Amat |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Exploring the idea of student protests as an autonomous object of research and discussion, this paper leads to the understanding that the transforming role of the university and its governance defines the possibilities for the political role of students. In this perspective, there is a particular constellation of the different forms of higher education governance that provides students with the right and even the responsibility of protesting as politically engaged citizens of the university and of the state. Approaching the transformation of the models of university governance as a set of archaeologically organised states this paper identifies the sequential roles provided to the students and the meaning of their protests and demonstrations. After visiting some antecedents of more contemporaneous student movements and protests, this paper focuses on the UK to explore three manifestations of university governance that can be roughly differentiated as the enduring democratic period that extends from the late 1960s to the late 1980s, the globalisation period that extends from the early 1990s to the mid-2000s and as the post-millennial turn. These periods, embodying three different styles of governance of higher education, not only demonstrate conformity with the political and economic contexts in which they are embeded, they also correspond to particular socio-technological and communicative ecosystems and determine the specificities of the role of the students and their capacity for political action. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-12T06:33:18Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-b378f6cd5ea6457c8177521d8c9fd6ed |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1726-670X 1726-670X |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-12T06:33:18Z |
publishDate | 2017-05-01 |
publisher | Paderborn University: Media Systems and Media Organisation Research Group |
record_format | Article |
series | tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique |
spelling | doaj.art-b378f6cd5ea6457c8177521d8c9fd6ed2023-09-03T01:30:36ZengPaderborn University: Media Systems and Media Organisation Research GrouptripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique1726-670X1726-670X2017-05-0115252453910.31269/triplec.v15i2.771771Student Protests. Three Periods of University GovernanceJoan Ramon Rodriguez-Amat0Bob Jeffery1Senior Lecturer Arts, Communication, Engineering and Sciences (ACES)Senior Lecturer Sheffield Hallam UniversityExploring the idea of student protests as an autonomous object of research and discussion, this paper leads to the understanding that the transforming role of the university and its governance defines the possibilities for the political role of students. In this perspective, there is a particular constellation of the different forms of higher education governance that provides students with the right and even the responsibility of protesting as politically engaged citizens of the university and of the state. Approaching the transformation of the models of university governance as a set of archaeologically organised states this paper identifies the sequential roles provided to the students and the meaning of their protests and demonstrations. After visiting some antecedents of more contemporaneous student movements and protests, this paper focuses on the UK to explore three manifestations of university governance that can be roughly differentiated as the enduring democratic period that extends from the late 1960s to the late 1980s, the globalisation period that extends from the early 1990s to the mid-2000s and as the post-millennial turn. These periods, embodying three different styles of governance of higher education, not only demonstrate conformity with the political and economic contexts in which they are embeded, they also correspond to particular socio-technological and communicative ecosystems and determine the specificities of the role of the students and their capacity for political action.https://www.triple-c.at/index.php/tripleC/article/view/771Student ProtestsHigher Education GovernanceSocial MovementsUnited KingdomInformation Ecologies |
spellingShingle | Joan Ramon Rodriguez-Amat Bob Jeffery Student Protests. Three Periods of University Governance tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique Student Protests Higher Education Governance Social Movements United Kingdom Information Ecologies |
title | Student Protests. Three Periods of University Governance |
title_full | Student Protests. Three Periods of University Governance |
title_fullStr | Student Protests. Three Periods of University Governance |
title_full_unstemmed | Student Protests. Three Periods of University Governance |
title_short | Student Protests. Three Periods of University Governance |
title_sort | student protests three periods of university governance |
topic | Student Protests Higher Education Governance Social Movements United Kingdom Information Ecologies |
url | https://www.triple-c.at/index.php/tripleC/article/view/771 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT joanramonrodriguezamat studentproteststhreeperiodsofuniversitygovernance AT bobjeffery studentproteststhreeperiodsofuniversitygovernance |