The Low-Cycle Fatigue Behavior, Failure Mechanism and Prediction of SLM Ti-6Al-4V Alloy with Different Heat Treatment Methods

Selective laser melting (SLM) is a promising additive manufacturing (AM) process for high-strength or high-manufacturing-cost metals such as Ti-6Al-4V widely applied in aeronautical industry components with high material waste or complex geometry. However, one of the main challenges of AM parts is t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jiangjing Xi, Yun Hu, Hui Xing, Yuanfei Han, Haiying Zhang, Jun Jiang, Kamran Nikbin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-10-01
Series:Materials
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/14/21/6276
_version_ 1797512239250407424
author Jiangjing Xi
Yun Hu
Hui Xing
Yuanfei Han
Haiying Zhang
Jun Jiang
Kamran Nikbin
author_facet Jiangjing Xi
Yun Hu
Hui Xing
Yuanfei Han
Haiying Zhang
Jun Jiang
Kamran Nikbin
author_sort Jiangjing Xi
collection DOAJ
description Selective laser melting (SLM) is a promising additive manufacturing (AM) process for high-strength or high-manufacturing-cost metals such as Ti-6Al-4V widely applied in aeronautical industry components with high material waste or complex geometry. However, one of the main challenges of AM parts is the variability in fatigue properties. In this study, standard cyclic fatigue and monotonic tensile testing specimens were fabricated by SLM and subsequently heat treated using the standard heat treatment (HT) or hot isostatic pressing (HIP) methods. All the specimens were post-treated to relieve the residual stress and subsequently machined to the same surface finishing. These specimens were tested in the low-cycle fatigue (LCF) regime. The effects of post-process methods on the failure mechanisms were observed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and optical microscopy (OM) characterization methods. While the tensile test results showed that specimens with different post-process treatment methods have similar tensile strength, the LCF test revealed that no significant difference exists between HT and HIP specimens. Based on the results, critical factors influencing the LCF properties are discussed. Furthermore, a microstructure-based multistage fatigue model was employed to predict the LCF life. The results show good agreement with the experiment.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T05:59:02Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b37d8571e8a2406d810464b0bad4ac55
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1996-1944
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T05:59:02Z
publishDate 2021-10-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Materials
spelling doaj.art-b37d8571e8a2406d810464b0bad4ac552023-11-22T21:09:39ZengMDPI AGMaterials1996-19442021-10-011421627610.3390/ma14216276The Low-Cycle Fatigue Behavior, Failure Mechanism and Prediction of SLM Ti-6Al-4V Alloy with Different Heat Treatment MethodsJiangjing Xi0Yun Hu1Hui Xing2Yuanfei Han3Haiying Zhang4Jun Jiang5Kamran Nikbin6Department of Mechanical Engineering, Imperial College London SW7 2AZ, UKDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Imperial College London SW7 2AZ, UKDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Imperial College London SW7 2AZ, UKDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Imperial College London SW7 2AZ, UKAircraft Strength Research Institute, Xi’an 710065, ChinaDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Imperial College London SW7 2AZ, UKDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Imperial College London SW7 2AZ, UKSelective laser melting (SLM) is a promising additive manufacturing (AM) process for high-strength or high-manufacturing-cost metals such as Ti-6Al-4V widely applied in aeronautical industry components with high material waste or complex geometry. However, one of the main challenges of AM parts is the variability in fatigue properties. In this study, standard cyclic fatigue and monotonic tensile testing specimens were fabricated by SLM and subsequently heat treated using the standard heat treatment (HT) or hot isostatic pressing (HIP) methods. All the specimens were post-treated to relieve the residual stress and subsequently machined to the same surface finishing. These specimens were tested in the low-cycle fatigue (LCF) regime. The effects of post-process methods on the failure mechanisms were observed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and optical microscopy (OM) characterization methods. While the tensile test results showed that specimens with different post-process treatment methods have similar tensile strength, the LCF test revealed that no significant difference exists between HT and HIP specimens. Based on the results, critical factors influencing the LCF properties are discussed. Furthermore, a microstructure-based multistage fatigue model was employed to predict the LCF life. The results show good agreement with the experiment.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/14/21/6276low-cycle fatiguetitanium alloySLMadditive manufacturingfatigue model
spellingShingle Jiangjing Xi
Yun Hu
Hui Xing
Yuanfei Han
Haiying Zhang
Jun Jiang
Kamran Nikbin
The Low-Cycle Fatigue Behavior, Failure Mechanism and Prediction of SLM Ti-6Al-4V Alloy with Different Heat Treatment Methods
Materials
low-cycle fatigue
titanium alloy
SLM
additive manufacturing
fatigue model
title The Low-Cycle Fatigue Behavior, Failure Mechanism and Prediction of SLM Ti-6Al-4V Alloy with Different Heat Treatment Methods
title_full The Low-Cycle Fatigue Behavior, Failure Mechanism and Prediction of SLM Ti-6Al-4V Alloy with Different Heat Treatment Methods
title_fullStr The Low-Cycle Fatigue Behavior, Failure Mechanism and Prediction of SLM Ti-6Al-4V Alloy with Different Heat Treatment Methods
title_full_unstemmed The Low-Cycle Fatigue Behavior, Failure Mechanism and Prediction of SLM Ti-6Al-4V Alloy with Different Heat Treatment Methods
title_short The Low-Cycle Fatigue Behavior, Failure Mechanism and Prediction of SLM Ti-6Al-4V Alloy with Different Heat Treatment Methods
title_sort low cycle fatigue behavior failure mechanism and prediction of slm ti 6al 4v alloy with different heat treatment methods
topic low-cycle fatigue
titanium alloy
SLM
additive manufacturing
fatigue model
url https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/14/21/6276
work_keys_str_mv AT jiangjingxi thelowcyclefatiguebehaviorfailuremechanismandpredictionofslmti6al4valloywithdifferentheattreatmentmethods
AT yunhu thelowcyclefatiguebehaviorfailuremechanismandpredictionofslmti6al4valloywithdifferentheattreatmentmethods
AT huixing thelowcyclefatiguebehaviorfailuremechanismandpredictionofslmti6al4valloywithdifferentheattreatmentmethods
AT yuanfeihan thelowcyclefatiguebehaviorfailuremechanismandpredictionofslmti6al4valloywithdifferentheattreatmentmethods
AT haiyingzhang thelowcyclefatiguebehaviorfailuremechanismandpredictionofslmti6al4valloywithdifferentheattreatmentmethods
AT junjiang thelowcyclefatiguebehaviorfailuremechanismandpredictionofslmti6al4valloywithdifferentheattreatmentmethods
AT kamrannikbin thelowcyclefatiguebehaviorfailuremechanismandpredictionofslmti6al4valloywithdifferentheattreatmentmethods
AT jiangjingxi lowcyclefatiguebehaviorfailuremechanismandpredictionofslmti6al4valloywithdifferentheattreatmentmethods
AT yunhu lowcyclefatiguebehaviorfailuremechanismandpredictionofslmti6al4valloywithdifferentheattreatmentmethods
AT huixing lowcyclefatiguebehaviorfailuremechanismandpredictionofslmti6al4valloywithdifferentheattreatmentmethods
AT yuanfeihan lowcyclefatiguebehaviorfailuremechanismandpredictionofslmti6al4valloywithdifferentheattreatmentmethods
AT haiyingzhang lowcyclefatiguebehaviorfailuremechanismandpredictionofslmti6al4valloywithdifferentheattreatmentmethods
AT junjiang lowcyclefatiguebehaviorfailuremechanismandpredictionofslmti6al4valloywithdifferentheattreatmentmethods
AT kamrannikbin lowcyclefatiguebehaviorfailuremechanismandpredictionofslmti6al4valloywithdifferentheattreatmentmethods