The Communication of Viewpoints in Jordanian Arabic: A Pragmatic Study

Expressing opinions is considered a significant communicative act frequently taking place in our conversations. It is one of the fairly neglected areas of research in the Arabic context. Among the studies conducted on the communicative acts, to the best of our knowledge, there has been no attempt to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Al-khawaldeh Nisreen, Abu Rahmeh Luay
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: De Gruyter 2022-07-01
Series:Open Linguistics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2022-0191
_version_ 1828383509049245696
author Al-khawaldeh Nisreen
Abu Rahmeh Luay
author_facet Al-khawaldeh Nisreen
Abu Rahmeh Luay
author_sort Al-khawaldeh Nisreen
collection DOAJ
description Expressing opinions is considered a significant communicative act frequently taking place in our conversations. It is one of the fairly neglected areas of research in the Arabic context. Among the studies conducted on the communicative acts, to the best of our knowledge, there has been no attempt to investigate the expressions of opinion and its strategies specifically in Jordanian Arabic (JA). To this end, the current study intends to investigate the communicative act of opinion giving in JA with reference to gender disparities. Data elicited from 50 male and 50 female speakers of JA via Discourse Completion Task and role-plays revealed that Jordanians resort to a mixture of expressions to convey their opinion clearly. They use various types of strategies, including direct expression of opinion, indirect manifestation of opinion, advice, suggesting, enumeration, prayers, address terms, complaining, personalized hedges, and rarely opting out. In addition, gender differences were also noticed in expressing this speech act. Males use direct expression strategy and imperative expression significantly more than the female participants, whereas the females used six strategies significantly more than their male counterparts: indirect expression, advice, personalized hedges, suggesting, prayers, and address terms.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T04:50:24Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b37d9897c31e4f8b8c2ada4f10a5d4f9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2300-9969
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T04:50:24Z
publishDate 2022-07-01
publisher De Gruyter
record_format Article
series Open Linguistics
spelling doaj.art-b37d9897c31e4f8b8c2ada4f10a5d4f92022-12-22T02:01:38ZengDe GruyterOpen Linguistics2300-99692022-07-018125827810.1515/opli-2022-0191The Communication of Viewpoints in Jordanian Arabic: A Pragmatic StudyAl-khawaldeh Nisreen0Abu Rahmeh Luay1Department of English Language and Literature, Faculty of Arts, The Hashemite University, P.O. Box 330127, Zarqa, 13133, JordanDepartment of English Language and Literature, Faculty of Arts, The Hashemite University, P.O. Box 330127, Zarqa, 13133, JordanExpressing opinions is considered a significant communicative act frequently taking place in our conversations. It is one of the fairly neglected areas of research in the Arabic context. Among the studies conducted on the communicative acts, to the best of our knowledge, there has been no attempt to investigate the expressions of opinion and its strategies specifically in Jordanian Arabic (JA). To this end, the current study intends to investigate the communicative act of opinion giving in JA with reference to gender disparities. Data elicited from 50 male and 50 female speakers of JA via Discourse Completion Task and role-plays revealed that Jordanians resort to a mixture of expressions to convey their opinion clearly. They use various types of strategies, including direct expression of opinion, indirect manifestation of opinion, advice, suggesting, enumeration, prayers, address terms, complaining, personalized hedges, and rarely opting out. In addition, gender differences were also noticed in expressing this speech act. Males use direct expression strategy and imperative expression significantly more than the female participants, whereas the females used six strategies significantly more than their male counterparts: indirect expression, advice, personalized hedges, suggesting, prayers, and address terms.https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2022-0191genderjordanian arabicpolitenessspeech actthe expression of opinion
spellingShingle Al-khawaldeh Nisreen
Abu Rahmeh Luay
The Communication of Viewpoints in Jordanian Arabic: A Pragmatic Study
Open Linguistics
gender
jordanian arabic
politeness
speech act
the expression of opinion
title The Communication of Viewpoints in Jordanian Arabic: A Pragmatic Study
title_full The Communication of Viewpoints in Jordanian Arabic: A Pragmatic Study
title_fullStr The Communication of Viewpoints in Jordanian Arabic: A Pragmatic Study
title_full_unstemmed The Communication of Viewpoints in Jordanian Arabic: A Pragmatic Study
title_short The Communication of Viewpoints in Jordanian Arabic: A Pragmatic Study
title_sort communication of viewpoints in jordanian arabic a pragmatic study
topic gender
jordanian arabic
politeness
speech act
the expression of opinion
url https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2022-0191
work_keys_str_mv AT alkhawaldehnisreen thecommunicationofviewpointsinjordanianarabicapragmaticstudy
AT aburahmehluay thecommunicationofviewpointsinjordanianarabicapragmaticstudy
AT alkhawaldehnisreen communicationofviewpointsinjordanianarabicapragmaticstudy
AT aburahmehluay communicationofviewpointsinjordanianarabicapragmaticstudy