Vision affects tactile target and distractor processing even when space is task-irrelevant

The human brain is adapted to integrate the information from multiple sensory modalities into coherent, robust representations of the objects and events in the external world. A large body of empirical research has demonstrated the ubiquitous nature of the interactions that take place between vision...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ann-Katrin eWesslein, Charles eSpence, Christian eFrings
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-02-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00084/full
_version_ 1819267183202533376
author Ann-Katrin eWesslein
Charles eSpence
Christian eFrings
author_facet Ann-Katrin eWesslein
Charles eSpence
Christian eFrings
author_sort Ann-Katrin eWesslein
collection DOAJ
description The human brain is adapted to integrate the information from multiple sensory modalities into coherent, robust representations of the objects and events in the external world. A large body of empirical research has demonstrated the ubiquitous nature of the interactions that take place between vision and touch, with the former typically dominating over the latter. Many studies have investigated the influence of visual stimuli on the processing of tactile stimuli (and vice versa). Other studies, meanwhile, have investigated the effect of directing a participant’s gaze either toward or else away from the body-part receiving the target tactile stimulation. Other studies, by contrast, have compared performance in those conditions in which the participant’s eyes have been open versus closed. We start by reviewing the research that has been published to date demonstrating the influence of vision on the processing of tactile targets, that is, on those stimuli that have to be attended or responded to. We outline that many – but not all – of the visuotactile interactions that have been observed to date may be attributable to the direction of spatial attention. We then move on to focus on the crossmodal influence of vision, as well as of the direction of gaze, on the processing of tactile distractors. We highlight the results of those studies demonstrating the influence of vision, rather than gaze direction (i.e., the direction of overt spatial attention), on tactile distractor processing (e.g., tactile variants of the negative-priming or flanker task). The conclusion is that no matter how vision of a tactile distractor is engaged, the result would appear to be the same, namely that tactile distractors are processed more thoroughly.
first_indexed 2024-12-23T21:13:07Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b386d30cbfd94ccb9f4f3a78d639be5e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-1078
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-23T21:13:07Z
publishDate 2014-02-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Psychology
spelling doaj.art-b386d30cbfd94ccb9f4f3a78d639be5e2022-12-21T17:31:01ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782014-02-01510.3389/fpsyg.2014.0008472911Vision affects tactile target and distractor processing even when space is task-irrelevantAnn-Katrin eWesslein0Charles eSpence1Christian eFrings2University of TrierUniversity of OxfordUniversity of TrierThe human brain is adapted to integrate the information from multiple sensory modalities into coherent, robust representations of the objects and events in the external world. A large body of empirical research has demonstrated the ubiquitous nature of the interactions that take place between vision and touch, with the former typically dominating over the latter. Many studies have investigated the influence of visual stimuli on the processing of tactile stimuli (and vice versa). Other studies, meanwhile, have investigated the effect of directing a participant’s gaze either toward or else away from the body-part receiving the target tactile stimulation. Other studies, by contrast, have compared performance in those conditions in which the participant’s eyes have been open versus closed. We start by reviewing the research that has been published to date demonstrating the influence of vision on the processing of tactile targets, that is, on those stimuli that have to be attended or responded to. We outline that many – but not all – of the visuotactile interactions that have been observed to date may be attributable to the direction of spatial attention. We then move on to focus on the crossmodal influence of vision, as well as of the direction of gaze, on the processing of tactile distractors. We highlight the results of those studies demonstrating the influence of vision, rather than gaze direction (i.e., the direction of overt spatial attention), on tactile distractor processing (e.g., tactile variants of the negative-priming or flanker task). The conclusion is that no matter how vision of a tactile distractor is engaged, the result would appear to be the same, namely that tactile distractors are processed more thoroughly.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00084/fullTouchselective attentionmultisensory integrationdistractor processingvisuo-tactile interaction
spellingShingle Ann-Katrin eWesslein
Charles eSpence
Christian eFrings
Vision affects tactile target and distractor processing even when space is task-irrelevant
Frontiers in Psychology
Touch
selective attention
multisensory integration
distractor processing
visuo-tactile interaction
title Vision affects tactile target and distractor processing even when space is task-irrelevant
title_full Vision affects tactile target and distractor processing even when space is task-irrelevant
title_fullStr Vision affects tactile target and distractor processing even when space is task-irrelevant
title_full_unstemmed Vision affects tactile target and distractor processing even when space is task-irrelevant
title_short Vision affects tactile target and distractor processing even when space is task-irrelevant
title_sort vision affects tactile target and distractor processing even when space is task irrelevant
topic Touch
selective attention
multisensory integration
distractor processing
visuo-tactile interaction
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00084/full
work_keys_str_mv AT annkatrinewesslein visionaffectstactiletargetanddistractorprocessingevenwhenspaceistaskirrelevant
AT charlesespence visionaffectstactiletargetanddistractorprocessingevenwhenspaceistaskirrelevant
AT christianefrings visionaffectstactiletargetanddistractorprocessingevenwhenspaceistaskirrelevant